Lauren Pinault1, Saeeda Khan2, Michael Tjepkema1. 1. Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 2. Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postal codes are often the only geographic identifier available to match subjects in a health dataset to census geography. This paper describes the characteristics of postal codes reported by the Canadian population on the census and, as an indicator of geocoding accuracy, the proportion that are linked to a single dissemination area (DA). DATA AND METHODS: Postal codes reported on the 2016 Census questionnaire were matched to a combination of the Postal Code Conversion File (PCCF) and the Postal Code Conversion File Plus (PCCF+ version 7B) (reference date November 2018) to calculate population-weighted counts and the number of matches to DAs by province or territory, delivery mode type (DMT), population centre or rural area size, and census metropolitan area. The number of single matches to census tracts (CTs), census subdivisions (CSDs) and census divisions (CDs) was also calculated. RESULTS: In Canada, 72.6% of the population reported postal codes that matched to a single DA. This proportion was higher in urban cores (87.1%) and among postal codes for an urban street address (DMT=A) (85.3%) or apartment building (DMT=B) (95.3%), and was lower in rural areas (26.2% to 38.1%) and among rural postal codes (13.9%). In comparison, 89.3% and 95.4% of the population reported postal codes matching to a single CSD or CD, respectively, while 92.1% of the population that live within CT boundaries were matched to a single CT. DISCUSSION: Matching postal codes to census geography is relatively accurate and frequently one to one in urban centres. In rural areas and for some types of postal code DMTs, alternative approaches to using the PCCF and PCCF+ for attaching census geography might be explored.
BACKGROUND: Postal codes are often the only geographic identifier available to match subjects in a health dataset to census geography. This paper describes the characteristics of postal codes reported by the Canadian population on the census and, as an indicator of geocoding accuracy, the proportion that are linked to a single dissemination area (DA). DATA AND METHODS: Postal codes reported on the 2016 Census questionnaire were matched to a combination of the Postal Code Conversion File (PCCF) and the Postal Code Conversion File Plus (PCCF+ version 7B) (reference date November 2018) to calculate population-weighted counts and the number of matches to DAs by province or territory, delivery mode type (DMT), population centre or rural area size, and census metropolitan area. The number of single matches to census tracts (CTs), census subdivisions (CSDs) and census divisions (CDs) was also calculated. RESULTS: In Canada, 72.6% of the population reported postal codes that matched to a single DA. This proportion was higher in urban cores (87.1%) and among postal codes for an urban street address (DMT=A) (85.3%) or apartment building (DMT=B) (95.3%), and was lower in rural areas (26.2% to 38.1%) and among rural postal codes (13.9%). In comparison, 89.3% and 95.4% of the population reported postal codes matching to a single CSD or CD, respectively, while 92.1% of the population that live within CT boundaries were matched to a single CT. DISCUSSION: Matching postal codes to census geography is relatively accurate and frequently one to one in urban centres. In rural areas and for some types of postal code DMTs, alternative approaches to using the PCCF and PCCF+ for attaching census geography might be explored.
Entities:
Keywords:
delivery mode type; Postal Code Conversion File Plus (PCCF+); geocoding; geography; postal code
Authors: Nicole Acosta; María A Bautista; Barbara J Waddell; Janine McCalder; Alexander Buchner Beaudet; Lawrence Man; Puja Pradhan; Navid Sedaghat; Chloe Papparis; Andra Bacanu; Jordan Hollman; Alexander Krusina; Danielle A Southern; Tyler Williamson; Carmen Li; Srijak Bhatnagar; Sean Murphy; Jianwei Chen; Darina Kuzma; Rhonda Clark; Jon Meddings; Jia Hu; Jason L Cabaj; John M Conly; Xiaotian Dai; Xuewen Lu; Thierry Chekouo; Norma J Ruecker; Gopal Achari; M Cathryn Ryan; Kevin Frankowski; Casey R J Hubert; Michael D Parkins Journal: Water Res Date: 2022-05-14 Impact factor: 13.400
Authors: Emma Ostermeier; Patricia Tucker; Andrew Clark; Jamie A Seabrook; Jason Gilliland Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 3.390