Literature DB >> 32643130

Patient-Reported Outcomes with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in People with Type 2 Diabetes: The MAGE Multicenter Observational Study.

Ides M Colin1, Kathy Alexandre2, Jacques Bruhwyler3, André Scheen4, Ann Verhaegen5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: MAGE was a Multicenter, single-Arm, observational 6-month (plus 6-month extension) study that aimed to assess treatment satisfaction, efficacy, and safety of insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) receiving basal-bolus insulin in a rEal-world setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were at least 18 years old, with T2DM for more than 1 year, HbA1c 7.0-10.0%. The primary endpoint was change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) total score (baseline to month 6). Secondary endpoints included reasons for starting Gla-300, changes in the DTSQ change version (DTSQc) total score, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) total behavior and worry scores at months 6 and 12, HbA1c changes at months 3, 6, 9, and 12, and safety.
RESULTS: MAGE included 87 adults (mean T2DM duration 17 years). The primary endpoint of DTSQs mean (standard deviation) total score improvement at month 6 was achieved (2.80 [5.46] points; p < 0.0001). The main reasons for Gla-300 initiation were to decrease HbA1c (89.7% of participants) and reduce the number of hypoglycemic events (35.6% of participants). Significant improvements were observed in the DTSQc total score and perceived hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia (baseline to month 6, p < 0.05). Significant changes in HFS-II behavior, worry, and total scores at 6 and 12 months were also observed (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant changes in HbA1c. Safety outcomes, including hypoglycemia, were comparable to previously reported trials.
CONCLUSIONS: The MAGE study indicates that Gla-300, as part of a basal-bolus regimen, results in improved treatment satisfaction and reduced hypoglycemia fear in people with advanced T2DM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basal-bolus insulin regimen; Hypoglycemia; Insulin glargine 300 U/mL; Quality of life; Type 2 diabetes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32643130     DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00866-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Ther        ISSN: 1869-6961            Impact factor:   2.945


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of Patient Reported Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus 100 U/mL in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Flash Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Ayman Abdullah Al Hayek; Asirvatham Alwin Robert; Abdulghani H Al Saeed; Mohamed Abdulaziz Al Dawish
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Impact of Age on the Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL: Results from the REALI European Pooled Data Analysis.

Authors:  Riccardo C Bonadonna; Didac Mauricio; Dirk Müller-Wieland; Nick Freemantle; Gregory Bigot; Celine Mauquoi; Alice Ciocca; Mireille Bonnemaire; Pierre Gourdy
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Does Gender Influence the Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes? Results from the REALI European Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Gourdy; Riccardo C Bonadonna; Nick Freemantle; Didac Mauricio; Dirk Müller-Wieland; Gregory Bigot; Celine Mauquoi; Alice Ciocca; Mireille Bonnemaire
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.945

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.