| Literature DB >> 32642474 |
Asiyeh Pirzadeh1, Fereshteh Zamani1, Mehri Khoshali2, Roya Kelishadi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sedentary habits may increase the noncommunicable disease risk factors, and few teens get enough physical activity. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the effects of a web-based intervention on the promotion of physical activity among adolescents using the transtheoretical model (TTM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 278 high school students who were randomly allocated into one of the three groups: two web-based intervention groups. The intervention groups 1 and 2 received education through web (www.salamat.family), but the second group received educational strategies based on TTM. Five questionnaires were applied two times before the intervention and 6 months after the intervention. And, in the control group, the data were collected using stage of exercise behavior change questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Student's t-test and two-way analysis of variance, and McNemar's test were applied to compare before and after the intervention. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Entities:
Keywords: Behavior change strategies; intervention; physical activity; web
Year: 2020 PMID: 32642474 PMCID: PMC7325747 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_36_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Stages of change and tailored education in every stage of precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance
| Stage of change | Process of change | Educational strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Precontemplation contemplation | Consciousness raising | Disadvantages of inadequate physical activity |
| Dramatic relief | Positive effects of physical activity on body, mental and community | |
| Environmental reevaluation | Appropriate physical activity level | |
| Preparation | Selfreevaluation | 24-h table of activities |
| Selfliberation | Goal-setting with examples | |
| Decisionmaking balance | Specific goals with examples | |
| Commitment to physical activity | ||
| Action maintenance | Counterconditioning | Types of physical activity exercises |
| Stimulus control | Stimulus messages and photos | |
| Helping relationships | Relaxation techniques | |
| Reinforcement management | Assess physical activity and self-reward | |
| Tempting fighting techniques |
Flow Diagram 1Flow diagram of the participants
Figure 1Comparison of participants' self-reported stage of change at before and after intervention
Transtheoretical model constructs scores at baseline
| Groups | Mean±SE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Decisional balance | Self-efficacy | Processes of changes | |
| Intervention 1 ( | 127.82±2.07 | 47.55±0.92 | 123.05±1.84 |
| Intervention 2 ( | 134.84±2.02 | 47.53±1.02 | 130.20±2.51 |
| Control ( | 123.63±0.76 | 56.10±0.59 | 149.08±1.44 |
| Total ( | 128.96±1.05 | 50.20±0.56 | 133.73±1.33 |
SE=Standard error
Correlation between transtheoretical model constructs scores at baseline
| Variables | Self-efficacy | Processes of changes | Decisional balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy | 1 | 0.685** | 0.152* |
| Processes of changes | 1 | 0.258** | |
| Decisional balance | 1 |
**,*Correlation are significant at the 0.01 and 0.05 levels, respectively
Comparison of mean differences between before and after in groups of stage change and interventional
| Groups | Decisional balance, mean±SE | P1 | Self-efficacy, mean±SE | P1 | Processes of changes, mean±SE | P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||||
| Intervention 1 | 12.74±5.78 | 29.82±3.35 | 0.008 | 13.23±2.20 | 15.08±1.06 | 0.045 | 40.17±4.07 | 47.38±2.31 | 0.102 |
| Intervention 2 | 15.43±3.78 | 26.61±2.90 | 0.019 | 12.37±1.65 | 14.05±1.35 | 0.430 | 28.41±3.69 | 37.95±3.24 | 0.055 |
| Control | −1.95±1.04 | 7.00±5.68 | 0.157 | 0.97±0.71 | 1.22±2.02 | 0.909 | 1.28±1.69 | 7.00±5.51 | 0.283 |
| P2 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
Group 1: People who remained in precontemplation, contemplation or preparation before and after intervention, Group 2: Participants who moved in a progressive pattern from precontemplation, contemplation or preparation at baseline to action or maintenance after intervention, P1 was based on independent Student’s t-test and P2 was obtained using two-way ANOVA. ANOVA=Analysis of variance, SE=Standard error
Distribution frequency (%) physical activity before and after intervention
| Before | After | Low or moderate (%) | High (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention 1 | Low or moderate | 5 (16.1) | 26 (83.9) | <0.001 |
| High | 3 (15.8) | 16 (84.2) | ||
| Intervention 2 | Low or moderate | 2 (5) | 38 (95) | <0.001 |
| High | 0 (0) | 27 (100) | ||
| Control | Low or moderate | 68 (82.9) | 14 (17.1) | 0.004 |
| High | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) |