| Literature DB >> 32642414 |
Zhonghua Wang1,2, Bingshu He1, Yaqi Liu1, Meiling Huo1, Wenqing Fu1, Chunyan Yang3, Jinfeng Wei3, Zeper Abliz1,2,4.
Abstract
Understanding of the nephrotoxicity induced by drug candidates is vital to drug discovery and development. Herein, an in situ metabolomics method based on air flow-assisted desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (AFADESI-MSI) was established for direct analysis of metabolites in renal tissue sections. This method was subsequently applied to investigate spatially resolved metabolic profile changes in rat kidney after the administration of aristolochic acid I, a known nephrotoxic drug, aimed to discover metabolites associated with nephrotoxicity. As a result, 38 metabolites related to the arginine-creatinine metabolic pathway, the urea cycle, the serine synthesis pathway, metabolism of lipids, choline, histamine, lysine, and adenosine triphosphate were significantly changed in the group treated with aristolochic acid I. These metabolites exhibited a unique distribution in rat kidney and a good spatial match with histopathological renal lesions. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying aristolochic acids nephrotoxicity and demonstrates that AFADESI-MSI-based in situ metabolomics is a promising technique for investigation of the molecular mechanism of drug toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: AA, aristolochic acids; AAI, aristolochic acids I; AAN, AA-induced nephrotoxicity; AFADESI; AFADESI, air flow-assisted desorption electrospray ionization; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; Aristolochic acid; CPT1, xarnitine palmitoyltransferase 1; DESI, desorption electrospray ionization; DG, diglyceride; GC, gas chromatograph; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; In situ metabolomics; LC, liquid chromatography; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; MG, monoglyceride; MS, mass spectrometry; MSI, mass spectrometry imaging; Mass spectrometry imaging; Nephrotoxicity; OPLS-DA, orthogonal projections to the latent structures' discriminant analysis; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PS, phosphatidylserine; ROI, region of interest; RSD, relative standard deviation; TG, triglyceride; TIC, total ion current; Ucr, urine creatinine; Upr, urine protein
Year: 2019 PMID: 32642414 PMCID: PMC7332651 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.12.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Scheme 1The research strategy for in situ metabolomics in nephrotoxicity of aristolochic acids I. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.
Figure 1MS spectra and images of metabolites with close m/z in rat kidney. (A) MS spectra of m/z 804.5309 and m/z 804.5524 ions in rat kidney. (B) MS image of m/z 804.5309. (C) MS image of m/z 804.5524. These two ions cannot be separated by mass spectrometry at MS resolutions of 30,000 and 60,000, but they can be distinguished at MS resolutions of 120,000 and 240,000. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.
Figure 2The reproducibility of the developed AFADESI-MSI method. Positive mode images for the distribution of betaine (m/z 118.0864), glycerophosphocholine (m/z 280.0922), and PE(36:4, m/z 778.4788) in adjacent renal slices analyzed on three successive days, and their relative standard deviation (RSD) of relative intensities in cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.
Body weight and biochemical parameters from aristolochic acid I (AAI)-treated and control rats on day 7 after administration.
| Parameter | Control | AAI-treated |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 284 ± 9.93 | 233 ± 16.3** |
| Ucr (urine creatinine, mmol/L) | 4.17 ± 0.86 | 4.85 ± 1.32* |
| Upr (24 h urine protein, mg) | 55.7 ± 11.6 | 75.3 ± 23.7* |
| Upr/Ucr | 0.65 ± 0.22 | 1.03 ± 0.14* |
| Bcr (blood creatinine, μmol/L) | 26.0 ± 2.45 | 27.6 ± 2.06 |
| Bun (blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L) | 5.00 ± 0.73 | 5.76 ± 0.45 |
| Serum CE (mmoL/L) | 1.48 ± 0.11 | 1.67 ± 0.29 |
| Serum TG (mmoL/L) | 0.66 ± 0.28 | 1.17 ± 0.45* |
| Serum HDL (mmoL/L) | 1.08 ± 0.05 | 1.17 ± 0.17 |
| Serum LDL (mmoL/L) | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.08 |
P values were calculated by performing the independent Student's t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; AAI, aristolochic acid I. CE, cholesteryl ester ; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride.
Figure 3Photomicrographs of whole H&E stained renal sections from (A) control and (B) AAI-treated rats. The morphology of renal corticomedullary from control and AAI-treated rats are shown in images (C) and (D) with a 20-fold magnification, respectively.
Metabolites tentatively identified in the AFADESI-MSI positive-ion mode with renal distribution information in control and AAI-treated rats.
| Metabolite identification | Elemental composition | Adduct | Theoretical ( | Measured ( | Delta | Tissue distribution | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | AAI-treated | ||||||
| Creatinine | C4H7N3O | [M+Na]+ | 136.0481 | 136.0483 | 1.47 | IM, C | IM (↑), JC (↑) |
| Creatine | C4H9N3O2 | [M+K]+ | 170.0326 | 170.0328 | 1.18 | C | C, M (↑) |
| Arginine | C6H14N4O2 | [M+H]+ | 175.1190 | 175.1191 | 0.57 | C | IM (↑), JC (↑) |
| Spermidine | C7H19N3 | [M+H]+ | 146.1652 | 146.1653 | 0.68 | C | JC (↑), M (↑) |
| Choline | C5H13NO | [M+H]+ | 104.1070 | 104.1071 | 0.96 | C | C (↑), M (↑) |
| Betaine | C5H11NO2 | [M+H]+ | 118.0863 | 118.0864 | 0.85 | OM | OM (↓) |
| Proline betaine | C7H13NO2 | [M+H]+ | 144.1019 | 144.1021 | 1.39 | OM | OM (↓) |
| Glycerophosphocholine | C8H20NO6P | [M+Na]+ | 280.0920 | 280.0922 | 0.71 | IM | IM (↑), JC (↑) |
| C7H11N3O | [M+H]+ | 154.0975 | 154.0977 | 1.30 | – | JC (↑) | |
| Phosphoserine | C3H8NO6P | [M+Na]+ | 207.9981 | 207.9980 | −0.48 | C, OM | JC (↑), M (↑) |
| Inosine | C10H12N4O5 | [M+K]+ | 307.0439 | 307.0441 | 0.65 | C, M | C, M (↓) |
| Fructosyl-lysine | C12H24N2O7 | [M+H]+ | 309.1656 | 309.1659 | 0.97 | JC | JC (↓) |
| Carnitine | C7H15NO3 | [M+H]+ | 162.1125 | 162.1126 | 0.62 | OM | OM (↑) |
| Linoleylcarnitine | C25H45NO4 | [M+H]+ | 424.3421 | 424.3425 | 0.94 | OM | OM (↓) |
| MG(18:2) | C21H38O4 | [M+K]+ | 393.2402 | 393.2404 | 0.51 | C | JC (↑) |
| MG(20:4) | C23H38O4 | [M+K]+ | 417.2402 | 417.2405 | 0.72 | C | JC (↑) |
| MG(22:5) | C25H40O4 | [M+K]+ | 443.2558 | 443.2563 | 1.13 | – | JC (↑) |
| MG(22:6) | C25H38O4 | [M+K]+ | 441.2402 | 441.2406 | 0.91 | C | JC (↑) |
| DG(36:2) | C39H72O5 | [M+K]+ | 659.5011 | 659.5015 | 0.61 | C, JC | C, JC (↑), OM (↑) |
| DG(38:4) | C41H72O5 | [M+K]+ | 683.5011 | 683.5020 | 1.32 | C, JC | C, JC (↑), OM (↑) |
| DG(38:6) | C41H68O5 | [M+K]+ | 679.4698 | 679.4705 | 1.03 | C, JC | JC (↑) |
| DG(40:6) | C43H72O5 | [M+K]+ | 707.5011 | 707.5023 | 1.70 | C | C, JC (↑) |
| PC(34:3) | C42H78NO8P | [M+Na]+ | 778.5357 | 778.5361 | 0.51 | C, M | JC (↑) |
| PC(36:4) | C44H80NO8P | [M+K]+ | 804.5514 | 804.5517 | 0.37 | C, JC, OM | JC (↑), OM |
| PC(38:4) | C46H84NO8P | [M+Na]+ | 832.5827 | 832.5832 | 0.60 | C, M | C, JC (↑), M |
| PC(40:4) | C48H88NO8P | [M+K]+ | 876.5879 | 876.5882 | 0.34 | OM | JC (↑), OM |
| PC(40:5) | C48H86NO8P | [M+Na]+ | 858.5983 | 858.5981 | −0.23 | OM | JC (↑), OM |
| PC(40:6) | C48H84NO8P | [M+K]+ | 872.5566 | 872.5572 | 0.69 | C, OM | C, JC (↑) |
| PE(34:2) | C39H74NO8P | [M+K]+ | 754.4784 | 754.4791 | 0.93 | C, JC | C, JC (↓) |
| PE(P-36:4) | C41H74NO7P | [M+Na]+ | 746.5095 | 746.5101 | 0.80 | C, JC, OM | C, JC (↓), OM |
| PE(36:4) | C41H74NO8P | [M+K]+ | 778.4784 | 778.4788 | 0.51 | C, JC,OM | C, JC (↓), OM (↓) |
| PE(P-38:5) | C43H76NO7P | [M+Na]+ | 788.4991 | 788.4998 | 0.89 | C, JC | C, JC (↓) |
| PE(38:5) | C43H76NO8P | [M+K]+ | 804.4940 | 804.4947 | 0.87 | C, OM | C, OM (↓) |
| PE(38:6) | C43H74NO8P | [M+K]+ | 802.4784 | 802.4789 | 0.62 | C, OM | C, OM (↓) |
| PS(39:4) | C45H80NO10P | [M+H]+ | 826.5593 | 826.5606 | 1.57 | C, JC | C, JC (↓) |
| PS(35:1) | C41H78NO10P | [M+Na]+ | 798.5256 | 798.5252 | −0.50 | C, JC | C, JC (↓) |
| PG(36:0) | C42H83O10P | [M+Na]+ | 801.5616 | 801.5615 | −0.12 | C, JC | C, JC (↑) |
| PG(42:8) | C48H79O10P | [M+Na]+ | 869.5303 | 869.5292 | −1.26 | C | C, JC (↑) |
Metabolites provisionally identified on the basis of exact mass, exact MS/MS data, and databases.
Metabolites putatively assigned on the basis of exact mass and databases with no useful fragmentation data.
Delta=(Measured m/z−Theoretical m/z)/Theoretical m/z × 106.
C, cortex; JC, juxtamedullary cortex; M, medulla; OM, outer medulla; IM, inner medulla. (↑) Indicates significant increase in local abundance; (↓) denotes significant decrease in local abundance. The peak intensities of these 38 metabolites and their fold changes between the exposed and control groups are shown in Supporting Information Table S1. –Not applicable.
Figure 4Spatial distribution and changes of metabolites involved in arginine–creatinine metabolic pathway in the kidneys from AAI-treated group and control group. The red fonts represent upregulated metabolites. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.
Figure 5Spatial distribution and changes of metabolites related to choline metabolism in the kidneys from AAI-treated group and control group. The red fonts represent upregulated metabolites. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.
Figure 6Spatial distribution and changes of metabolites related to lipids metabolism in the kidneys from AAI-treated group and control group. The red fonts represent upregulated metabolites and blue fonts represent downregulated metabolites. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.
Figure 7Spatial distribution and changes of N-acetylhistamine, phosphoserine, inosine, and fructosyl-lysine in the kidneys from AAI-treated group and control group. The red fonts represent upregulated metabolites and blue fonts represent downregulated metabolites. Scale bar: 2.5 mm.