Literature DB >> 32642328

Achieving effective patient and public involvement in international clinical trials in neurology.

Emma C Tallantyre1, Nikos Evangelou1, Clare Bale1, Burhan Z Chaudhry1, Emma H Gray1, Nicholas LaRocca1, Sue Pavitt1, Deborah M Miller1, Sarah M Planchon1, Daniel Ontaneda1, Ana Manzano1.   

Abstract

There is a growing need for patient and public involvement (PPI) to inform the way that research is developed and performed. International randomized controlled trials are particularly likely to benefit from PPI, but guidance is lacking on how or when it should be incorporated. In this article, we describe the PPI process that occurred during the design and initiation of an international treatment clinical trial in MS. PPI was incorporated using a structured approach, aiming to minimize bias and achieve equivalence in study design, implementation, and interpretation. Methods included PPI representation within the study research team, and the use of focus groups, analyzed using thematic framework analysis. We report the outcomes of PPI and make recommendations on its use in other neurology clinical trials. By sharing our model for PPI, we aim to maximize effectiveness of future public involvement and to allow its effect to be better evaluated.
© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32642328      PMCID: PMC7292561          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  9 in total

1.  Patients' roles and rights in research.

Authors:  Paul Wicks; Tessa Richards; Simon Denegri; Fiona Godlee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 2.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Amy Price; Sara Schroter; Rosamund Snow; Melissa Hicks; Rebecca Harmston; Sophie Staniszewska; Sam Parker; Tessa Richards
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.

Authors:  Antoine Boivin; Pascale Lehoux; Jako Burgers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation.

Authors:  Carrol Gamble; Louise Dudley; Alison Allam; Philip Bell; Heather Goodare; Bec Hanley; Jennifer Preston; Alison Walker; Paula Williamson; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Louise Dudley; Carrol Gamble; Jennifer Preston; Deborah Buck; Bec Hanley; Paula Williamson; Bridget Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

Authors:  S Staniszewska; J Brett; I Simera; K Seers; C Mockford; S Goodlad; D G Altman; D Moher; R Barber; S Denegri; A Entwistle; P Littlejohns; C Morris; R Suleman; V Thomas; C Tysall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-08-02

8.  Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients.

Authors:  Carl Heneghan; Ben Goldacre; Kamal R Mahtani
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Iveta Simera; Kate Seers; Carole Mockford; Susan Goodlad; Doug Altman; David Moher; Rosemary Barber; Simon Denegri; Andrew Robert Entwistle; Peter Littlejohns; Christopher Morris; Rashida Suleman; Victoria Thomas; Colin Tysall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.