| Literature DB >> 32642328 |
Emma C Tallantyre1, Nikos Evangelou1, Clare Bale1, Burhan Z Chaudhry1, Emma H Gray1, Nicholas LaRocca1, Sue Pavitt1, Deborah M Miller1, Sarah M Planchon1, Daniel Ontaneda1, Ana Manzano1.
Abstract
There is a growing need for patient and public involvement (PPI) to inform the way that research is developed and performed. International randomized controlled trials are particularly likely to benefit from PPI, but guidance is lacking on how or when it should be incorporated. In this article, we describe the PPI process that occurred during the design and initiation of an international treatment clinical trial in MS. PPI was incorporated using a structured approach, aiming to minimize bias and achieve equivalence in study design, implementation, and interpretation. Methods included PPI representation within the study research team, and the use of focus groups, analyzed using thematic framework analysis. We report the outcomes of PPI and make recommendations on its use in other neurology clinical trials. By sharing our model for PPI, we aim to maximize effectiveness of future public involvement and to allow its effect to be better evaluated.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32642328 PMCID: PMC7292561 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Clin Pract ISSN: 2163-0402