The clinical efficacy of AG NPP709 (Synatura®) in patients with chronic bronchitis type stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: AG NPP709 (Synatura®) has been demonstrated to be efficacious in decreasing cough and sputum in patients with acute upper respiratory infection and chronic inflammatory bronchitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of AG NPP709 in patients with chronic bronchitis type chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical trial (NCT03623282). Chronic bronchitis type COPD patients aged >40 years were enrolled. The primary endpoint was improvement on the CAT scores between the baseline visit and week 12. The secondary endpoints were the effect of AG NPP709 on the pulmonary function and systemic inflammation, as indexed by CRP, fibrinogen, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-33 levels.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. All patients were male, and their mean age was 71.93±7.93 years. The mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio was 58.63±11.40, and FEV1 (%) was 75.93±20.42. The mean total CAT score was 14.77±7.14. Of these patients, 26 were followed up after 3 months. A significant improvement was observed in the total CAT score (from 14.38±6.62 to 12.73±6.60, P=0.005). Fibrinogen level decreased significantly (P=0.013). No serious adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: AG NPP709 improved the quality of life, as represented by the CAT score, in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD, and significantly reduced fibrinogen levels. These results suggest that AG NPP709 is efficacious and safe in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD. 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disorder characterized by a persistent airflow limitation and chronic systemic inflammation, due to significant exposure to noxious particles and gases (1). COPD manifests in two clinical phenotypes: chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Chronic bronchitis is clinically defined as a productive cough on most days of the month for at least 3 months during a year or more in 2 consecutive years, and characterized pathologically by hyperplasia of the submucosal glands and thickening of the subepithelial basement membrane (2).

The main characteristic of chronic inflammation in patients with COPD is the accumulation of neutrophils, macrophages, B-cells, lymphoid aggregates, and CD8+ T-cells in the small airways. Cytokines and chemokines are involved in many aspects of COPD, including recruitment of these cells, airway remodeling, induction of emphysema, and systemic inflammation (3). Many reports have described elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in induced sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Sputum neutrophils and circulating levels of TNF-α and C-reactive protein (CRP) are the best markers of COPD severity (4). In particular, elevated concentrations of biomarkers of systemic inflammation, such as IL-6, CRP, fibrinogen, and leukocytes, are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with COPD, including COPD exacerbations and mortality (5). In recent studies, plasma IL-33 levels in patients with stable COPD were associated with blood eosinophil count, age, smoking status and the presence of chronic bronchitis, and were thought to be related to disease severity (6).

AG NPP709 (Synatura®) was developed by a South Korean pharmaceutical company (Ahn-Gook Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.), and formulated with a dried 30% ethanolic extract of Hedera helix L. (ivy; Lamiaceae) leaves and a dried water-saturated butanolic extract of the Coptis chinensis Franch (Ranunculaceae) rhizome (3:1, w/w). AG NPP709 was demonstrated to be efficacious in decreasing cough and sputum in patients with acute upper respiratory infection and chronic inflammatory bronchitis, in a phase III clinical trial conducted in 2010 (NCT01151202). AG NPP709 was approved by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in March 2011 for treating cough and sputum due to bronchitis. AG NPP709 is currently on the market; however, no study has investigated the effect of AG NPP709 in patients with COPD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of AG NPP709 in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD.

Methods

Study design

This study was a 12-week, prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase IV clinical trial (NCT03623282). The first patient to participate in the study was enrolled in July 2017 and recruitment was conducted until November 2017. Baseline characteristics of age, gender, chronic bronchitis symptoms, COPD medications, pulmonary function test (PFT) score, smoking history, and COPD assessment test (CAT) score were noted. A blood sample was obtained to measure the degree of systemic inflammation. All eligible patients received AG NPP709 three times daily (15 mL each time) for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, the PFT and CAT were performed again and a blood sample was taken to measure systemic inflammation. The degree of systemic inflammation was measured by CRP, fibrinogen, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-33, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

The primary endpoint of the study was improvement in the CAT score between the baseline visit and week 12. Secondary endpoints were the effect of AG NPP709 on PFT and systemic inflammation, as indexed by CRP, fibrinogen, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-33 levels. Adverse events, safety, and tolerability were also assessed over the 12-week treatment period.

During the treatment period, inhalers and other drugs used by the enrolled patients, such as mucolytics and antitussives used by the enrolled patients, were not changed or stopped to minimize the likelihood of being affected by the change.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (IRB approval No. 2017-3400-0006) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were: (I) age >40 years, (II) post-bronchodilator (pBD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio <70, (III) smoking history ≥10 pack years, and (IV) symptoms of chronic bronchitis, including cough and sputum for more than 3 months or more in 2 consecutive years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria were COPD in the acute exacerbation state, pneumonia, and active pulmonary tuberculosis. Pregnant, lactating and lactose-intolerant patients were also excluded.

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome of the study was an improvement in the CAT score during the 12 weeks of AG NPP709 treatment. Sample size was calculated based on a two-sided null hypothesis test assessed at the 5% (α=0.05) significance level with 80% (β=0.2) power. Twenty-five patients with a standard deviation of 7.7 were required to test whether AG NPP709 could improve the CAT score (7). Therefore, considering a dropout rate of approximately 15%, 30 patients were enrolled in the study.

Changes from baseline to the endpoints were analyzed by the paired t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows software (ver. 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 30 patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 26 were followed-up after 3 months, 4 were excluded from the analysis; two patients were lost during follow-up. One was excluded due to acute exacerbation of COPD, and one stopped taking the drug due to nausea. Ultimately, 26 patients with COPD were included in the efficacy analysis ().

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study.

The baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients are shown in . All patients were male, and their mean age (mean ± SD) was 71.93±7.93 years. Of all patients, seven (23.33%) were current smokers and their mean smoking history was 49.00±25.50 pack-years. Twenty-three (76.67%) were ex-smokers, and their mean smoking history was 46.21±25.34 pack-years. There was no significant difference in pack years between the current smoker group and the ex-smoker group.

Table 1

Baseline epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients

Characteristic	Mean ± SD or number (%)
Age, years	71.93±7.93
Gender, male (%)	30 (100%)
Smoking status, n (%)
Current smoker, pack years	7 (23.3%), 49.00±25.50
Ex-smoker, pack years	23 (76.7%), 46.21±25.34
Total CAT scores	14.77±7.14
GOLD 2017 classification, n (%)
A	6 (20.0%)
B	17 (56.6%)
C	2 (6.6%)
D	5 (16.6%)
PFT
pBD FVC (L)	3.67±0.90
pBD FVC (%)	88.70±14.57
pBD FEV1 (L)	2.18±0.71
pBD FEV1 (%)	75.93±20.42
pBD FEV1/FVC	58.63±11.40
COPD treatment, inhaler, n (%)
LAMA	4 (13.3%)
LABA	2 (6.6%)
LABA + LAMA	16 (53.3%)
ICS + LABA	4 (13.3%)
ICS + LABA + LAMA	2 (6.6%)
No inhaler	2 (6.6%)
Mucolytics, n (%)
Erdosteine	7 (23.3%)
N-acetylcysteine	2 (6.6%)

Values are mean ± standard deviation. PFT, pulmonary function test; pBD, post-bronchodilator; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LABA, long-acting beta-agonist; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid.

The mean total CAT score for all enrolled patients was 14.77±7.14. When analyzing baseline CAT score, current smoker group showed significantly higher than ex-smoker group in second CAT item, “My chest is full of phlegm.” (3.57±0.98 vs. 2.39±1.31, 95% CI: 0.08–2.28, P=0.036), sixth CAT item, “I am not at all confident leaving my home because of my lung condition.” (2.00±1.29 vs. 0.74±0.62, 95% CI: 0.54–1.98, P=0.001) and total CAT score (20.43±8.56 vs. 13.04±6.03, 95% CI: 1.50–13.27, P=0.016).

In pulmonary function test, the mean post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio was 58.63±11.40, and FEV1 (%) was 75.93±20.42. The post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC was lower in the current smoker group than in the ex-smoker group (49.71±17.07 vs. 61.35±7.67, 95% CI: 2.42–20.85, P=0.015).

Patients were classified using the refined ABCD assessment of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017 criteria (1). Six patients were in group A, seventeen in group B, two in group C, and five in group D.

During one year prior to enrollment, 23 of 30 (76.7%) patients had no history of acute exacerbation or only experienced one moderate exacerbation. Seven patients (23.3%) experienced more than one moderate exacerbation or at least one severe exacerbation. One patient (3.3%) dropped out due to acute exacerbation during the treatment period.

Twenty-eight of the thirty patients used inhalers. A long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) was used by 16 (53.3%) patients; 4 others (13.3%) took LAMA, 2 (6.6%) took LABA, 4 (13.3%) took an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA, and 2 (6.6%) took ICS/LABA/LAMA. Nine (30%) patients used mucolytics. Seven (23.3%) patients used erdosteine, and 2 (6.6%) used N-acetylcysteine.

We compared the CAT scores of the groups with (ICS/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS) and without ICS (LAMA or LAMA, LAMA/LABA and without inhaler) to further analyze the baseline characteristics. The total CAT score and the second CAT item, “My chest is full of phlegm”, were not significantly different between the two groups in the Mann-Whitney test (P=0.705, P=0.940, respectively) and the Student t-test (P=0.695, P=0.736, respectively).

Endpoint data analysis

The CAT scores and PFT results were examined at week 12 to assess the improvement in chronic bronchitis symptoms. Blood sampling was also performed to assess the degree of systemic inflammation. The CAT and PFT scores were available at baseline for 30 patients, and for 26 patients at week 12. Data on the blood tests were available at baseline for 30 patients, and for 24 patients at week 12. Data regarding adverse effects were available in 28 patients.

The primary endpoint of this study was a decrease in the CAT score after treatment versus baseline. A significant reduction in the total CAT score was observed (from 14.38±6.62 to 12.73±6.60, 95% CI: 0.54–2.77, P=0.005) (). The score on the second CAT item, “My chest is full of phlegm” also decreased significantly (from 2.62±1.36 to 2.19±1.17, 95% CI: 0.01–0.84, P=0.046) (). Scores for other CAT items, such as those pertaining to cough, chest tightness, limitation of activities of daily living, sleeplessness, and energy levels, were not different. After 12 weeks of treatment, changes in CAT scores were significantly decreased only in the ex-smoker group. In the ex-smoker group, total CAT score decreased significantly (from 13.25±6.32 to 11.40±5.73, 95% CI: 0.53–3.17, P=0.008). There was no significant change in CAT score before and after treatment in the current smoker group. The PFT score was not significantly different between baseline and week 12 ().

Figure 2

Changes in the COPD assessment test (CAT) scores between baseline (visit 1) and week 12 (visit 2). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Figure 3

Changes in pulmonary function tests between baseline (visit 1) and week 12 (visit 2). pBD, post-bronchodilator.

Treatment with AG NPP709 for 12 weeks significantly reduced the fibrinogen level (from 8.42±13.15 to 2.27±3.32, 95% CI: 1.44–10.87, P=0.013). No significant differences were detected in the systemic inflammatory markers, such as CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, or IL-33 ().

Figure 4

Changes in the systemic inflammatory markers. Fibrinogen, CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-33, in clockwise order. V1, visit 1 (baseline); V2, visit 2 (week 12); CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-33, interleukin-33.

After 12 weeks of using AG NPP 709, the reduction of CAT score and the use of ICS were analyzed by χ2 test. There was no significant difference between the percentage of use of ICS and the percentage of responder (patients whose CAT score decreased) (P=0.070 in the second CAT item and P=0.115 in total CAT score). There was no association between the use of ICS and fibrinogen reduction (P=0.289), either. Therefore, we have concluded that the use of ICS did not have a significant effect in our study.

In addition, CAT score and fibrinogen were analyzed again except for 2 patients who did not use inhaler. A significant reduction in the total CAT score was observed (from 14.33±6.88 to 12.75±6.88, 95% CI: 0.38–2.78, P=0.012). However, the decrease in the second item of the CAT score showed only a trend (from 2.50±1.32 to 2.17±1.20, 95% CI: −0.05–0.72, P=0.088). However, we think statistical insignificance is due to small sample size. The fibrinogen level was decreased significantly (from 8.59±13.61 to 2.42±3.43, 95% CI 1.06–11.29, P=0.020).

Three patients (10.7%) treated with AG NPP709 experienced at least one adverse event during the treatment period. All three had nausea, and one stopped treatment for that reason. However, no serious adverse events developed.

Discussion

Ivy leaf extract preparations have long been used to treat cough and mucus hypersecretion. α-Hederin, an ingredient in ivy leaf extracts, inhibits internalization of the β2-adrenergic receptor and enables a high number of receptors to be activated. Elevated cAMP levels and increased cAMP signaling promote the formation and secretion of surfactant from alveolar type II cells, resulting in a secretolytic effect. Bronchial muscle cells also respond to the increased cAMP level, such that muscle relaxation and bronchodilation are achieved (8).

In addition to α-Hederin, several compounds isolated from ivy including hederasaponin-C, hederacolchiside-E, and hederasaponin-F (HSF) have anti-inflammatory properties. HSF exhibits direct anti-influenza effects and is enhanced when used with oseltamivir in vitro and in vivo. PR8-infected mice treated with a combination of oseltamivir and HSF had reduced necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltrates, and pulmonary edema compared with untreated mice. HSF decreased inflammatory cytokines, especially TNF-α (9). A dried 30% ethanolic extract of ivy leaves is the most widely used formulation due to its well-established efficacy and tolerability, as proven in many clinical trials (10).

Berberine is a natural product found in some medicinal plants, such as Coptis sp. and Berberis sp., and has a wide range of pharmacological activities, such as an anti-inflammatory action, protection against cardiovascular diseases, and regulation of cholesterol metabolism. Xu et al. showed that berberine attenuates cigarette smoke-induced airway inflammation and mucus overproduction by significantly reducing TNF-α, IL-1β, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels in a mouse model (11). Lee et al. reported that berberine suppresses inflammatory agent-induced IL-1β and TNF-α production in human lung cells (12).

In this study, AG NPP709 was formulated with a dried 30% ethanolic extract of H. helix L. (ivy; Lamiaceae) leaves and a dried water-saturated butanolic extract of the C. chinensis Franch (Ranunculaceae) rhizome (3:1, w/w). In a phase III clinical trial conducted in South Korea in 2010, AG NPP709 demonstrated efficacy for decreasing cough and sputum compared to a control group prescribed an ivy leaf extract.

This is the first study to assess the efficacy of AG NPP709 in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD. This 12-week study met the primary endpoint of symptom improvement in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD, due to reduced phlegm and total CAT score. We noted a significant reduction in serum fibrinogen level as a secondary endpoints. However, PFT and other systemic inflammatory markers, such as CRP, IL-6, IL-33 and TNF-α, were not significantly different after treatment versus baseline. Therefore, concluding that AG NPP709 improves systemic inflammation should be done with caution.

In our study, the adverse effects of AG NPP709 were mild and infrequent. In addition, this study confirmed long-term (12 weeks) safety of AG NPP709 for the first time; in a previous phase III study, AG NPP709 was given only for 5 days.

We did not exclude asthma or emphysema type COPD patients from the study design and patient enrollment process of this study. However, none of the 30 enrolled patients had been diagnosed with asthma before age 40. CT scan had been performed already for the purpose of lung cancer screening in all 30 patients before the enrollment of this study. Bronchitis or bronchial wall thickening was mentioned in official CT reading by radiology specialist in 13 patients. In 21 patients, emphysema in various degree was observed in CT scan. Eleven patients showed both bronchial wall thickening and emphysema.

Chronic bronchitis sometimes can be combined with emphysema. Previous studies consistently showed that chronic bronchitis can coexist with emphysema (13). Patients with mixed phenotype, chronic bronchitis combined with emphysema, are more symptomatic and associated with exacerbation (14). Therefore, patients with chronic bronchitis combined with emphysema were not excluded. It is important to note that all 30 patients included had symptoms consistent with the definition of chronic bronchitis.

In general, the use of drugs such as ACE inhibitors, opiates, pregabalin and gabapentin are not allowed in cough related studies. There was no inclusion criterion regarding non-permitted medications in this study. However, we have reviewed all enrolled patients. We have confirmed that ACE inhibitors, opiates, pregabalin, and gabapentin were not administered to any patients enrolled during the study period.

This study had several limitations. First, there was no control group, so the significant improvement seen in the CAT score should be validated in a controlled trial. A large randomized multicenter prospective trial is currently being prepared for this purpose. Second, this study was conducted in an exclusively male population (100%). The main reason for the male predominance is the very low rate of smoking among females in South Korea. Third, the systemic inflammatory markers were not compared to a healthy control group. Fourth, the compliance of medication was not monitored. However, AG NPP709 is an oral medication and easy to take. There was no serious side effect. We have noticed no compliance issue during this clinical trial. Finally, the sample size was small.

Conclusions

AG NPP709 improved symptoms in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD, due to reduced phlegm and total CAT score. The adverse effect was also mild and infrequent. These results suggest that AG NPP709 is efficacious and safe in patients with chronic bronchitis type COPD.

The article’s supplementary files as