The use of prefilled adrenaline syringes improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality-high-fidelity simulator-based study.

BACKGROUND: In some countries, adrenaline is available only in glass ampoules. However, simplification of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by introducing prefilled syringes may ensure more efficient CPR. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different forms of adrenaline on the CPR quality.
METHODS: In a randomized cross-examination simulation study, 100 two-person paramedical teams took part in two 10-minute scenarios of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in a pulseless electrical activity mechanism (PEA). In the first scenario the set of medicines contained glass ampoules (group ST) with adrenaline, in the second prefilled syringes (group AMPS). The parameters of the CPR quality [correct number and depth of chest compressions (CC), no flow time, chest recoil, time to apply supraglottic airways device (SAD)] were compared.
RESULTS: In group AMPS the first dose of adrenaline was administered after 114.2±28.3 seconds after the initiation of CPR whereas after 178.1±62.6 seconds in group ST (P<0.001). Chest compression fraction (CCF) was higher (81.8%±6.1%) in group AMPS than in group ST (71.2%±7.5%). Paramedics performed CC at better frequency, to a preferred depth and in an appropriate place in group AMPS. Faster decision to apply SAD (131.7±34.0 s in group AMPS and 220.3±81.5 s in group ST) ensured faster achievement of airway patency in this group (181.5±48.7 vs. 271.2±101.5 s).
CONCLUSIONS: Prefilled syringes with crucial drugs during CPR may significantly improve the quality of CPR performed by two-person teams. 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) affects from 350,000 to 700,000 people per year in Europe and over 380,000 in the United States. The importance of following steps of survival chain such as fast notifying of the rescue system, performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by accident witnesses, using an automated external defibrillator (AED) and introducing an integrated post-resuscitation is frequently emphasized. They may have direct impact on the survival rate following out-of-hospital SCA. In addition, it is essential that paramedics undertake advanced life support (ALS) procedures that aim at the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Continuous improvement of each of the chain links is crucial for improvement of the survival rate of SCA patients (1,2).

Performing ALS procedures needs to focus on prioritizing the tasks. It mainly concerns the short-handed rescue teams. The Polish law on the National Medical Emergency Services states that rescue teams must consist of at least 2 paramedics (3). However, there are many reports that have proven it impossible for the two-paramedics teams to satisfy the requirements of restrictive protocols, described by European Resuscitation Council (ERC), including the time criteria (4).

It is significant in such cases to apply the newest therapeutic solutions, which will facilitate the prioritizing process as well as the time reduction of certain procedures. All of the current guidelines of procedural algorithm in SCA, indicate the necessity of routine adrenaline (epinephrine) administration, regardless of SCA mechanism. Notwithstanding, those recommendations concentrate on defining the frequency and route of drug administration rather than on the method of its preparation. It is extremely important, especially for the short-handed teams, to search for simplification of the procedures, which will enable paramedics to focus on their priorities (5).

The aim of the research was to test the effect of various adrenaline preparation methods on the quality of CPR during SCA.

Methods

Study group

To conduct the study, the authors designed a randomized simulative cross-study attended by 100 randomly assigned two-person teams, consisting of professionally active paramedics. Their age range varied from 28 to 54 years. All study group members have had an experience in emergency departments of minimum 5 years.

The study has been approved by a local bioethics committee (KB 1075/19). All of the participants have given their consent to take part in the simulation. No additional financial support has been searched to carry on the study.

Simulator

The study was based on a high-fidelity simulator Resusci Anne QCPR (Laerdal - Stavanger, Norway). The mannequin records chest compressions (CC) and ventilation parameters. Moreover, the mannequin’s respiratory tracts enable intubations, insertion of supraglottic airway device (SAD) and ventilation with a use of a bag valve mask followed by a visible chest movement. Its arms have been filed with artificial blood with the aim of verifying proper venipuncture performed by paramedics. The mannequin also simulates the carotid artery and single peripheral artery pulse.

Equipment and medicines

Two simulation rooms were arranged identically and were equipped with the same devices. The study group was well-versed with the room itself, available equipment and medicines as well. Before the scenario, a prebriefing session was conducted in order to familiarize paramedics with simulator features and equipment distribution across the room. The study group had at their disposal a previously-known defibrillator ZOLL M-Series and two sets of medicines. The former was equipped with glass ampoules with adrenaline 1 mg in 1 mL (adrenaline; WZF, Warsaw, Poland), factory packed in a plastic packaging. The latter was equipped with prefilled syringes with adrenaline 1 mg in 10 mL 1:10,000 (adrenaline; Aguettant Ltd, Bristol, United Kingdom) in an aluminum packaging. It is the only drug in a prefilled syringe on the Polish market, which is approved to be administered for SCA patients. Furthermore, each team had at their disposal physiological saline in 500 mL containers with a mini spike to dilute the liquid. All the medicines used in the study exceeded the expiration date and were donated by a local hospital pharmacy.

Scenario

Each team took part in two 10-minute scenarios featuring SCA. The heart rhythm visible on the monitor was the same during each analysis [pulseless electrical activity (PEA)]. In the first scenario only traditional ampoules with adrenaline (1 mg in 1 mL) were available (group ST). Paramedics needed to aspirate medicines from ampoules and dilute them according to specification in order to administer them intravenously. In the second scenario the teams were provided with prefilled syringes with adrenaline (1 mg diluted to 10 mL) (group AMPS). In between scenarios the teams had a break of 15 minutes, during which the facilitators did not sum up their performance. The order of scenarios was random.

Storing and processing data

All data regarding the quality of CC was recorded with the use of Laerdal PC SkillReporting System 2.0. (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). The analyses and simulations were conducted by qualified medical simulation instructors. The following parameters of CC quality such as chest compression fraction (CCF), average no flow time, proper hands position, total number of CC, average CC depth, percentage of CC with a proper depth, average CC rate, percentage of CC with a proper rate and percentage of CC with a proper chest relaxation (chest recoil) were recorded and then analyzed.

Additionally, independent timekeepers measured the time of the following steps: adrenaline administration, performing a venipuncture and airways support with SAD.

Data processing and statistical analysis

Regarding continuous data, they were checked for normality with the use of the Shapiro-Wilk W test. These satisfying the criteria of normal distribution were expressed as the mean with standard deviation (SD) and unpaired t-test was applied to estimate differences between groups. The categorical variables were presented as the numbers (n) with percentage (%) and then they were compared between subgroups with the use of the Yates corrected χ2 test. Correlations between selected variables describing action of paramedics (i.e., adrenaline preparation or administration) and indices of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (i.e., CCF or no flow time) were assessed by means of either parametric Pearson correlation coefficient or non-parametric Spearman rank correlation test. A P value below 0.05 was considered of statistical significance. All the data was inserted into an excel file whereas the statistical analysis was performed with the use of Statistica 10.0 for Windows (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

Results

Time of adrenaline preparation and injection

The first dose of adrenaline was injected intravenously after 114.2±28.3 seconds of CRP initiation in group AMPST and after 178.1±62.6 seconds in group ST (P<0.001). Since the time of obtaining venous vascular access [either start (42.3±15.8 vs. 41.0±22.8 seconds of CPR) or completion (94.5±17.0 vs. 100.5±38.0 seconds of CPR) of this action; in group AMPS and ST, respectively] did not differ between groups, an aforementioned delay in the first drug dose administration in AMPS patients resulted exclusively from significant difference in drug preparation time (13.4±6.9 vs. 68.6±38.7 seconds, in group AMPS and ST, respectively). To clarify this difference, time-flow charts with the absolute times of the consecutive stages of CPR expressed in seconds until the first dose of adrenaline are presented in the . Moreover, in group ST, drug preparation time correlated significantly with the time-point of the first dose of adrenaline administration ().

Figure 1

Timelines for AMPS and ST groups: iv access time, adrenaline preparation and injection. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Figure 2

Correlation graph for ST group: adrenaline preparation time vs. 1st dose of adrenaline. ADR, adrenaline.

Comparison of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation quality

The most important variables that characterize quality of resuscitation differed significantly between groups. The indices of CPR favored group that received adrenaline with prefilled syringes. Among others, CCF, mean depth of CC, rate of optimal chest recoil after CC, appropriate rate were higher in this group. Moreover, no flow time as well as supraglottic airway device introduction to make respiratory airways open were significantly shorter when compared to group with adrenaline in standard ampoules. The detailed values of these parameters are outlined in .

Table 1

Detailed comparison ST vs. AMPS groups

Variables*	Group ST	Group AMPS	P value
CC parameters
CCF (%)	71.2±7.5	81.8±6.1	<0.001**
No flow time (sec)	167.7±47.2	110.0±35.9	<0.001**
Correct hands position (%)	90.2±9.4	95.2±4.6	0.023**
CC (n)	978±81	1000±63	0.136
Rate of CC (rate/min)	118±6	117±6	0.256
Correct CC rate (%)	40.9±20.1	54.4±21.3	0.003**
CC depth (mm)	53.0±3.0	55.2±3.5	0.001**
Correct CC depth (%)	48.3±21.1	54.4±21.9	0.154
Correct chest recoil (%)	24.6±12.9	39.7±17.4	<0.001**
Respiratory airways patency
SAD start*** (s)	220.3±81.5	131.7±34.0	<0.001**
SAD duration (s)	50.9±27.8	49.8±17.3	0.863
SAD completed*** (s)	271.2±101.5	181.5±48.7	<0.001**

*, variables are expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SD). **, results of statistical analysis (P value) are of statistical significance. ***, mean time of SAD start and completed refers to the CPR scenario initiation. CC, chest compression(s); CCF, chest compression fraction; SAD, supraglottic airway device.

Association of drug preparation time with parameters of CPR quality

Drug preparation time was proved to have significant impact on the quality of CPR. Longer preparation, although checked only in AMPS scenario, negatively influenced some parameters of CC and maintenance of respiratory airways patency. Delay in adrenaline injections in group ST resulted predominantly from longer preparation of this medication (r=0.85; P<0.001; ). In this group, longer preparation of adrenaline resulted in worse quality of resuscitation. It correlated significantly and negatively with CCF (r=−0.45; P=0.001, ) and positively with no flow time (r=0.42; P=0.002; ). Moreover, negative impact of delayed adrenaline injection on rate of CC (r=−0.52; P<0.001) and appropriate chest recoil (r=−0.38; P=0.006) were also noted. Additionally, statistical analysis revealed significant and positive correlation (r=0.48; P<0.001) time of adrenaline preparation and the period of SAD introduction (as the difference between SAD completed and SAD start).

Figure 3

Correlation graph for group ST: adrenaline preparation time vs. chest compression fraction (CCF). ADR, adrenaline.

Figure 4

Correlation graph for group ST: adrenaline preparation time vs. no flow time. ADR, adrenaline.

Discussion

The research on optimization of SCA treatment has been conducted for many years. We hope the findings of our study will expand our knowledge in this area of interest. Several scientific studies have contributed to the creation of specialized organizations, which scrutinize recent reports that may increase patients’ chances of survival. Since 2010 both American Heart Association (AHA) and ERC have been advocating a use of adrenaline in each of circulatory arrest mechanism in a dose of 1 mg every 3 to 5 minutes (2,5). The guidelines emphasize that it is substantial to carry out more extensive research on the effectiveness of adrenaline administration (6). Although injection of adrenaline remains one of the most common actions in ALS procedures, scientists are still inconsistent about the effectiveness of its administration in SCA patients. Retrospective observational studies that involved 6,033 patients (data received from National Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry) have shown that administration of adrenaline within the in-hospital treatment resulted not only in the lower rate of ROSC but also in a 30-day survival (7). There are many animal tests which have shown a positive impact of adrenaline on perfusion of the most important organs, but simultaneously it might compromise microcirculation (8). Moreover, impact of adrenaline administration on long-term outcomes in SCA patients is unknown (9). Numerous clinical observations together with retrospective medical records analyses and meta-analyses have demonstrated a deterioration of patients’ long-term results after adrenaline administration (6). On the other side, other reports have shown considerable improvement of neurological results after discharge (10). Thus, it is essential to lead clinical studies in order to resolve the remaining doubts.

Medical Rescue Teams differ depending on specific regulations provided by health care system in each country. The distinctions encompass composition and competences of team members together with types of patients to be assisted. AHA have introduced a concept of work dynamics of a resuscitation team (11). According to their guidelines, regardless of the number of team members, there are 6 roles to be played during CPR. These include: (I) team leader, (II) person performing CC, (III) person performing ventilation, (IV) person operating a cardiac monitor, (V) person preparing and administering medicines and (VI) time-keeper. Medical Rescue Team is the most effective with 6 members on board, each of whom takes responsibility for the specific role. The fewer members in a team, the more roles are to be performed by one person simultaneously. This precludes paramedics from focusing on a priority action of high-quality CC (11). Unfortunately, in Polish health-care system paramedics usually work on SCA pair-wise. Each of them needs to perform 3 roles in order to ensure proper effectiveness of CPR. The teams adopt a sort of a medical compromise, which eliminates certain steps towards those of a higher priority. In the initial phase one of the paramedics performs basic life support (BLS) procedures, whereas their partner prepares for implementation of advanced routines.

Our study has proven that introducing prefilled syringes accelerated the time of first adrenaline administration. It also confirms findings in the previously published studies that compared administration time of drugs in prefilled syringes versus traditional ampoules (12,13). Prefilled syringes have significantly reduced drug preparation time. Subhi et al. showed additionally that this method has eliminated most of the preparation phase steps such as disinfection of an ampoule, application and removal of a needle for aspiration, and dilution of a drug to a desired amount (13). Moreover, a risk of contamination has decreased. Reducing the preparation time enables the paramedics to focus on other priorities (13). In another study, Ornato et al. explored an effect of errors committed during CPR on a patient survival rate on a huge number of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) cases (more than 118,000) (14). The most frequent lapses consisted in a delay of drug administration—even over 5 minutes since diagnosis. Eventually, it has contributed to a decrease in a survival rate of IHCA individuals (14). A use of prefilled syringes not only reduces the administration time, but it also substantially increases patients’ safety (15). In the authors’ study, most team members responsible for preparing the medicines omitted certain steps when using traditional ampoules. Hardly ever did they use a separate needle, but aspirated adrenaline directly to a syringe instead.

It must be pointed that routine application of drugs in the prefilled syringes has also potential disadvantages. A complex structure of such prepared medicines constitutes a real challenge for the manufacturers who need to ensure safe production and effectiveness of the medicine. Furthermore, the materials used to produce prefilled syringes must be thoroughly tested to minimize the risk of interaction between the material and the medicine stored in it. Moreover, diluted drugs ready for application may be less stable than their concentrates. At last, the complex production process and research generate high cost of prefilled syringes (16).

The study also revealed that prefilled syringes have enhanced the quality of CPR as proved by an increased proportion of time devoted to uninterrupted CC and a decrease in no flow time factor. Moreover, a use of prefilled syringes has resulted in making a faster decision about supraglottic airway devices application. This method followed by a confirmation of accurate ventilation, enabled paramedics to performed asynchronous CC. During the study all the teams provided this type of compressions, what caused an increased CCF and a decrease in no flow time factor. High-quality CC have been confirmed to be a crucial element of CPR, which have significantly improved SCA patients’ prognosis (17). AHA with ERC point out to the importance of minimalizing pauses in CC (18,19). They stressed that each pause resulted in decreasing blood flow in the coronary vessels and through the central nervous system. Thus, many experts agree that uninterrupted CC are associated with higher survival rate (18). An importance of CC quality was pointed out by AHA and some clinically useful parameters (e.g., CCF) were included in its guidelines from 2015 (20). CCF defines the period of time devoted to uninterrupted CC, which shall exceed 60%. However, the best results are accomplished with CCF exceeding 80% (17,21). To reach these values, procedures performed during CC should be simplified. Drugs administration represents one of these procedures (20). Our analysis has revealed that simplification of drug administration during CPR led to an increase in CCF accompanied by a decrease in no flow time.

Moreover, we supported a current trend to apply more extensively high-fidelity simulation to test hypothesis difficult to examine on the human beings. The simulator-based studies enable researchers to verify whether performing a certain method in a particular way has an impact on critical steps in patient treatment (22). It helps to develop a well-prospering chain of procedures devoid of errors, which allows paramedics to focus on priorities. It is of the utmost importance when patient treatment is multi-stage or when the team is short-handed. Therefore, due to the conducted analysis the authors were able to assess how the simplification of adrenaline administration affects the quality of CPR. The authors’ analysis revealed that a use of prefilled syringes during CPR impacts significantly the quality of CPR in two-person teams. The reduction of time devoted to drug administration arose from elimination of some of the preparatory steps. The authors are aware of limitations of their research. It is obvious that performing studies on mannequins even on high-fidelity simulators, has a different value than analyses of outcomes in the clinical trials. The latter, particularly randomized and double-blind involving SCA patients may raise some clinical concerns. On the other hand, high-fidelity simulation enables to examine and then standardize many, not only emergency, procedures, and to limit the factors that might influence the final outcome. It must be stressed that equipment used in our study was the same for each scenario. In reality, frequently medicine and other devices used during prehospital SCA differs in each ambulance. In the study only one type of prefilled syringes was used. However, currently numerous types of prefilled syringes of various structure and packaging are commercially available. These aforementioned differences may have an impact on preparation and administration of the medicines thus eventually on final clinical outcomes of CPR.

Conclusions

It has been proven that a simplification of adrenaline administration by a use of prefilled syringes considerably enhances the quality of CPR because it enables paramedics to focus on priorities such as CPR quality and overall accuracy of procedures.

The article’s supplementary files as