| Literature DB >> 32642106 |
Jian Hou1,2, Shaojie Huang1,2, Yan Long1, Jiaxing Huang1, Song Yang1, Jianping Yao1, Guangxian Chen1, Yuan Yue1, Mengya Liang1, Bo Mei1, Jiawen Li1, Zhongkai Wu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. DACT2 is a novel and important mediator of signaling pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance and functions of DACT2 expression in AF.Entities:
Keywords: DACT2; atrial fibrillation (AF); structural and electrical atrial remodeling; β-catenin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32642106 PMCID: PMC7330378 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-19-4206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Clinical characteristics of patients with valvular heart disease
| Characteristic | Sinus rhythm (n=10) | AF (n=18) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female (% male) | 6/4 (54.5%) | 5/13 (45.5%) | 0.103 |
| Ages (years) | 54.500±13.616 | 49.684±10.066 | 0.288 |
| NYHA | 0.076 | ||
| I + II | 8 (28.6%) | 8 (28.6%) | |
| III + IV | 2 (7.1%) | 10 (35.7%) | |
| Echocardiography | |||
| LA | 42.700±7.930 | 64.9444±21.952 | 0.006* |
| LVD | 51.200±8.791 | 52.167±10.170 | 0.806 |
| LVS | 33.600±7.168 | 33.833±5.773 | 0.926 |
| IVS | 10.350±2.450 | 9.611±1.650 | 0.349 |
| LVPW | 10.000±1.633 | 9.500±1.465 | 0.414 |
| RA | 47.200±9.016 | 63.056±12.600 | 0.002* |
| RV | 24.100±10.225 | 26.222±9.944 | 0.597 |
| EF | 63.200±6.812 | 62.167±7.649 | 0.725 |
| CHADS2 score | 0.800±0.789 | 0.444±0.922 | 0.314 |
| CHA2DVASc | 1.200±1.033 | 1.167±1.043 | 0.936 |
P value comparison between the 2 groups with the independent Student’s t-test or χ2-test. *, P≤0.05. AF, atrial fibrillation.
Primers for qRT-PCR
| Name | Gene information | Primers |
|---|---|---|
| HL-1 cell line | ||
| DACT2 | NM_001286350.1 | TCGGTTGATGAGACTACTGTGCC |
| ACCAGGTCCTGCCGATACTTG | ||
| KCNE1 | NM_008424.3 | CAATTCCACGACTGTTCTGCC |
| TTGAAAGGGTCGTGGGAGTG | ||
| KCNE2 | NM_134110.3 | CATTAGCCAATTTGACCCAGACA |
| GCCACCACGATGAACGAGAA | ||
| KCNE3 | NM_001190869.1 | TCCAACGGGACTGAGACCTG |
| CACTTTGCGTGAACGGGTATAT | ||
| KCNE4 | NM_021342.1 | GGAGCCTCTGAACAGCACATACC |
| GCCATAGAAGGACATAACGACCA | ||
| KCNE5 | NM_021487.1 | GTCGTCCCTGACCCTTTCGT |
| CGGCTAGGCAGGCATAGAAGA | ||
| KCNJ2 | NM_008425.4 | TCCATACCCGACAACAGTGCA |
| AGCACGAAGGCAAGACAGAAGA | ||
| KCNH2 | NM_013569.2 | TGATGCCTCAGGTTCCAGCT |
| CGGTAGCGTACAAGGTCAGAGTC | ||
| KCNJ5 | NM_010605.4 | CAAGAAGATTCCCAAACAGGCT |
| CCAGATCACCTCGGACATAAGC | ||
| KCNQ1 | NM_008434.2 | TTCGCCACATCAGCTATCAGG |
| AGGAGGAGAAGATAAGGCCCAG | ||
| CACNA1C | NM_009781.4 | GTTCAAGGGCAAGGTGGTACAT |
| TGCATTGGCATTCATGTTGG | ||
| CACNB2 | NM_023116.4 | GTTCGGCAGACTCCTACACCAG |
| ATCCGATTTCACAGCCTTCTTTA | ||
| SCN5A | NM_021544.4 | TGGCAAACTTCCTGTTACCTCG |
| TTGCCCTTATTCAGCACGATG | ||
| β-actin | NM_007393.3 | GTGACGTTGACATCCGTAAAGA |
| GTAACAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCAC | ||
| Primary rat atrial fibroblasts | ||
| Collagen I | NM_053304.1 | GTACATCAGCCCAAACCCCA |
| CAGGATCGGAACCTTCGCTT | ||
| Collagen III | NM_032085.1 | AGGGCAGGGAACAACTGATG |
| GGTCCCACATTGCACAAAGC | ||
| β-actin | NM_031144 | TGCTATGTTGCCCTAGACTTCG |
| GTTGGCATAGAGGTCTTTACGG | ||
Antibodies used in these studies
| Antibody to | Mono/polyclonal | Company | Application (dilution) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DACT2 | Rabbit/poly | Abcam | Immunohistochemical staining (1:100) |
| DACT2 | Rabbit/poly | Origene | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| β-catenin | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Phospho-β-Catenin (Thr41/Ser45) | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Phospho-β-Catenin (Ser552) | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Phospho-Smad2 (Ser465/467) | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Phospho-Smad3 (Ser423/425) | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Smad2/3 | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Smad2 | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Smad3 | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Smad4 | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Phospho-Smad2 (Ser465/467) | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| Phospho-Smad3 (Ser423/425) | Rabbit/poly | Cell Signal Technology | Western blotting (1:1,000) |
| GAPDH | Mouse/mono | Proteintech | Western blotting (1:5,000) |
Figure 1The expression pattern of DACT2 in the myocardial tissues of patients with valvular heart disease. (A,B) Immunohistochemistry evaluating DACT2 expression in the SR (A) and AF (B) groups. (C,D) Masson’s trichrome staining indicating fibrosis severity in the SR (C) and AF (D) groups. The sections indicated in A and C were obtained from the same SR patient, and the sections indicated in B and D were obtained from the same AF patient. Scale bars: 100 µm. (E) Fibrosis ratios of the AF and SR groups. (F) Fibrosis ratios of the weak and strong DACT2 expression groups. *, P≤0.05; **, P≤0.01. SR, sinus rhythm; AF, atrial fibrillation.
The relationship of DACT2 expression in myocardium with cardiac rhythm of patients with valvular heart disease
| Variable | Weak | Strong | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| SR | 1 (3.6%) | 9 (32.1%) | 0.022* |
| AF | 10 (35.7%) | 8 (28.6%) |
As long as the sample contained cells with DACT2 staining, the expression level was regarded as weak if mean density <0.004, strong if mean density ≥0.004. P value comparison between the 2 groups with the independent Student’s t-test or χ2-test. *, P≤0.05. SR, sinus rhythm; AF, atrial fibrillation.
The mean value comparing of patient clinical parameter of different DACT2 expression groups in myocardium of patients with valvular heart disease
| Variable | Weak | Strong | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| EF (%) | 64.364±9.157 | 61.353±5.700 | 0.292 |
| LA (mm) | 63.818±17.634 | 52.059±22.030 | 0.149 |
| LVD (mm) | 50.364±10.698 | 52.765±9.203 | 0.532 |
| LVS (mm) | 31.909±4.763 | 34.941±6.805 | 0.210 |
| IVS (mm) | 9.636±1.362 | 10.029±2.294 | 0.614 |
| LVPW (mm) | 9.455±0.820 | 9.823±1.845 | 0.540 |
| RA (mm) | 65.182±13.423 | 52.353±11.581 | 0.012* |
| RV (mm) | 25.182±3.281 | 25.647±12.604 | 0.906 |
As long as the sample contained cells with DACT2 staining, the expression level was regarded as weak if mean density <0.004, strong if mean density ≥0.004. Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between 2 groups. *, P≤0.05.
The relationship of DACT2 expression with fibrosis degree in myocardium of patients with valvular heart disease
| Fibrosis degreeb | DACT2 expressiona | P (Spearman rho) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weak | Strong | ||
| Weak | 1 | 9 | 0.010* |
| Strong | 9 | 8 | −0.476 |
| Very strong | 1 | 0 | |
a, as long as the sample contained cells with DACT2 staining, the expression level was regarded as weak if mean density <0.004, strong if mean density ≥0.004; b, the level of fibrosis was regarded as weak if mean ratio <0.1, strong if mean ratio ≥0.1 and <0.3, very strong if mean ratio ≥0.3. Correlations between the expression of DACT2 and fibrosis degree was done with the non-parametric Spearman Rank Correlation test. *, P≤0.05.
Figure 2The effect of DACT2 on the ion channel protein mRNA level and Wnt signaling pathway in mouse atrial muscle cells. (A and B) Establishment of the DACT2-overexpressing cell line by using HL-1 cells; The expression levels of KCNE family proteins (C to F), KCNH2 (G), KCNJ5 (H), KCNQ1 (I), CACNA1C (J), CACNB2 (K), SCN5A (L). (M) The regulation of DACT2 on the Wnt and TGF-β signaling pathways in HL-1 cells. The experiment was repeated at least three times. Representative graphs are provided. *, P≤0.05; **, P≤0.01.
Figure 3The regulation of DACT2 on collagen I and collagen III via TGF-β signaling pathways in primary rat atrial fibroblasts. (A and B) Establishment of the DACT2-overexpressing cell line; (C) the expression levels of collagen I and collagen III; (D) the detection of TGF-β signaling pathways after DACT2 overexpression in primary rat atrial fibroblasts. The experiment was repeated at least three times. Representative graphs are provided. *, P≤0.05.