| Literature DB >> 32642039 |
Amit Kumar1, Amit Gupta1, Rajarshi Ghosh1, Rajeev Pandey1, Sanjeev Kumar1.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to compare 2 techniques of arthrocentesis, to find out the efficacy of one over the other at various parameters, and to contribute to the scarce literature of these 2 techniques. Forty patients reported with a chief complaint of pain in temporomandibular joint (TMJ), clicking in TMJ, and restricted mouth opening were included in this study. Twenty patients were divided into 2 groups, all reporting with temporomandibular disorders. Group A was treated with 2-needle technique of arthrocentesis, while group B underwent concentric needle technique of arthrocentesis under local anesthesia with Ringer's lactate solution. The operating time was found to be less in concentric needle technique (mean: 25.36 minutes) compared to 2-needle technique (mean: 42.82 minutes), and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Concentric needle technique proved to be a better alternative for TMJ arthrocentesis as it has quite a lot of advantages over 2-needle technique.Entities:
Keywords: TMJ disorders; arthrocentesis; corticosteroids; temporomandibular joint
Year: 2020 PMID: 32642039 PMCID: PMC7311832 DOI: 10.1177/1943387520911826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr ISSN: 1943-3875