| Literature DB >> 32641961 |
Mehrnoosh Sedighi1,2, Mahdieh Faghihi3, Mahmoud Rafieian-Kopaei4, Bahram Rasoulian5, Afshin Nazari5.
Abstract
Melissa officinalis has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities and is used in various diseases. Aim of the study: We investigated the role of M. officinalis extract (MOE) against ischemia-induced arrhythmia and heart injury after five days of reperfusion in an in-vivo rat model of regional heart ischemia. The leaf extract of M. officinalis was standardized through HPLC analysis. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 32) were subjected to 30 min of ischemia by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 5 days of reperfusion. The rats (n = 8 in each group) were randomized to receive vehicle or M. officinalis as follows: group I served as saline control with ischemia, groups II, III and IV received different doses of MOE- (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively), by oral gavage daily for 14 days prior to ischemia. Administration of M. officinalis significantly improved ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced myocardial dysfunction by reduction of infarct size, also, during the ischemic period, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular ectopic beats episodes decreased as compared with that of the control group. Stabilized ST segment changes and QTc shortening increased the R and T wave amplitudes and the heart rate during ischemia. The extract also caused significant elevations in serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity as well as a significant decrease in serum cardiac troponin I (CTnI), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, 5 days after reperfusion. MOE-100mg/kg was the effective dose. Cinamic acid (21.81 ± 1.26 mg/gr) was the main phenolic compound of plant sample. The ethanol extract of M. officinalis was observed to exhibit cardioprotective effects against I/R injury, probably due to antioxidant properties. The results indicate that MOE has antioxidant and cardio-protective effects against ischemia-induced arrhythmias and ischemia-reperfusion induced injury as was reflected by reduction of infarct size and cardiac injury biomarkers. These data support the potential uses of M. officinalis in the treatment of heart ischemia- reperfusion disorders and even developing new anti- arrhythmias drugs after further investigations.Entities:
Keywords: Heart; Ischemia; Melissa officinalis; Rat; Reperfusion injury
Year: 2019 PMID: 32641961 PMCID: PMC6934948 DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1Examples of electrocardiogram recordings and definition of various changes and arrhythmias: During baseline (A), single VEBs (B), ST segment during ischemia (C), by-geminate(D), couplet (E), ventricular fibrillation (F) and ventricular tachycardia (G)
Figure 2HPLC chromatographic pattern for determination of Cinnamic acid from extract of Melissa officinalis powder
Changes in heart rate in various groups. The values are mean ± SEM; HR = heart rate (beats/min); (n: 8 in all groups)
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 241.5±2.46 | 228.87±3.34 | 231.87±4.65 |
| MOE-25 | 219±13.33 | 269.87±14.93* | 194.37±14 |
| MOE-50 | 196±14.38 | 240.25±14.23 | 170±14.39 |
| MOE-100 | 265.5±39.80 | 312.87±25.06##& | 214.75±15.7 |
* Significant difference compared to baseline (p < 0.05); $ Significant difference compared to the end of ischemic period (p < 0.05); $$ Significant difference compared to the end of ischemic period (p < 0.01); # Significant difference compared to control group (p < 0.05). ## Significant difference compared to control group (p < 0.01). & Significant difference compared to MOE-50 (p < 0.05).
Hemodynamic parameters at 5 days after reperfusion in different groups (n: 8 in all groups). The values are mean ± SEM; MAP (mean arterial pressure), SAP and DAP (systolic and diastolic arterial pressure) and PP (pulse pressure)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 84.12±6.56 | 126.5±11.93 | 80±6.81 | 26±5.09 |
| CI-50 | 74.16±2.16 | 86.57±3.01** | 49.28±4.64** | 17.98±3.51 |
| CI-100 | 80.3±8.16 | 92.26±6.41** | 58.57±3.04* | 14.39±3.29* |
| CI-200 | 80.62±3.81 | 312.87±25.06##& | 65±7.82 | 12.40±2.01* |
*Significant difference compared to the control group (p < 0.05). ** Significant difference compared to the control group (p < 0.01).
Figure 3(A) The original pictures of TTC staining heart slices. (B) Myocardial infarct size (IS/LV %) in control and MOE (25, 50, 100) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***P < 0.001 vs. control. ###P < 0.001 vs.MOE-50 group. MOE = Melissa officinalis extract-treated groups
Figure 4(A) Total number of VT (ventricular tachycardia) and VEB (ventricular ectopic beats) episodes during 30 min ischemia in different groups. (B) Total duration of VT episodes during 30 min ischemia in different groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Changes in ECG parameters of various groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | QTC(ms) | 242.25±24.86 | 206.12±23.88 | 122.37 ±10## | 179.87±26.98 |
| QRS(μV) | 17±0.59 | 17±0.65 | 17.25±0.83 | 13.75±0.25## ££ | |
| R(μV) | 524.62±49.83 | 466.62±24.53 | 421.12±41.97 | 426.62±39.85 | |
| T(μV) | 267.87±48.16 | 170.75±14.49 | 200.62±28.04 | 231.5±13.13 | |
| ST(μV) | 252.5±20.21 | 194.5±27.06 | 178.62±24.54 | 129.12±6.05## | |
| End of ischemia 30 | QTC(ms) | 279.75±21.89 | 119.37 ±4.50*### | 150.87±13.37 ### | 103.75±3.25*### |
| QRS(μV) | 19.62±1.01 | 15.62±0.41## | 16±0.59 ## | 13.87±0.39 ### | |
| R(μV) | 612.87±46.82 | 523.5±21.05 | 474±38.37 | 618.25±34.57**£ | |
| T(μV) | 233±25.48 | 217.25±24.32 £ | 252.25±49.49 | 365.5±35.72* | |
| ST(μV) | 319.7±44.73 | 254.37±22.32 | 141.75±12.71## | 151.75±32.92## | |
| End of reperfusion 60 | QTC(ms) | 250.62±20.07 | 201.37±26.68$ | 116.5±9.55###£ | 152.75±16.59 ## |
| QRS(μV) | 17.75±0.86 | 16.12±0.63 | 16.25±1.43 | 13.87±0.29 # | |
| R(μV) | 530.37±72.99 | 370.25±33.65*$$ | 380.87±37.74 | 449.75±37.43$ | |
| T(μV) | 250.75±22.51 | 149.5±12.69$ | 187. ±36.70 | 232±35.12 $ | |
| ST(μV) | 314±29.42 | 184.87±27.57 ## | 223.25±19.90 # $ | 127.5±7.76 ### & |
The values are mean ± SEM.
* Significant difference compared to baseline (p < 0.05); ** significant difference compared to the baseline (p < 0.01); ## significant difference compared to control group at corresponding interval (p < 0.01); ### significant difference compared to the control group at corresponding interval (p < 0.001); $ significant difference compared to ischemia duration (p < 0.05); $$ significant difference compared to ischemia duration (p < 0.01); £ Significant difference compared to ischemia duration in 50 mg/kg Melissa officinalis group (p < 0.05);
££ Significant difference compared to ischemia duration in 25 and 50 mg/kg Melissa officinalis groups (p < 0.01); & significant difference in reperfusion duration compared to 50 mg/kg Melissa officinalis extract-treated group in the corresponding interval (p < 0.05).
Effect of various treatment on serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) 5 days after reperfusion
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 40±5.24 | 133.52±24.29 | 686.17±42.15 |
| MOE-25 | 41.42±14.95 | 119.29±18.93 | 727.13±18.45 |
| MOE-50 | 37.5±15.86 | 111.77±14.95 | 811.76±24.17 |
| MOE-100 | 104.28±16.08* | 157.45±12.50 | 904.69± 15.57 |
The values are mean ± SEM of 8 animals in each group. * Significant difference compared to control, MOE-25and 50 groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effect of various treatments on serum levels of MDA (A), LDH (B) and CtnI (C) at 5 days after reperfusion in different groups. The values are expressed as mean±SEM; cTnI = Cardiac troponin I; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; MDA = malondialdehyde. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * Significant difference compared to the control group (p < 0.05); ** Significant difference compared to the control group (p < 0.01); *** Significant difference compared to the control group (p < 0.001); # Significant difference compared to the 100 mg/kg M. officinalis extract-treated group (p < 0.05)