| Literature DB >> 32641741 |
Goshtasp Cheraghian1, Michael P Wistuba2.
Abstract
In this study, surface morphology, rheological and chemicEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32641741 PMCID: PMC7343882 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68007-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic diagram indicating the material preparation, aging process, and experimental tests. Image partially created with BioRender.
Figure 2FESEM image of CS-NPs: (a) aggregation of clay nanoparticles form a unique chaotic structure of rosebud shape; the blue color represents uniform dispersion of CS-NPs, while aggregation of clay NPs and silica NPs are colored in red; (b) CS-NPs aggregation; and (c) uniform dispersion of CS-NPs.
Figure 3FESEM image of CS-NPs: (a) size of clay nanolayers; and (b) size of fumed silica nanoparticles.
Figure 4Analysis of bitumen modified with clay/silica nanoparticles (CS-NPs) by means of EDS mapping: elemental spot maps of titanium (Ti), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), silicon (Si), magnesium (Mg), aluminium (Al), Nitrogen (N), and combination intensity map of all seven elements.
Figure 5Complex modulus and phase angle of modified bitumen with CS-NPs before laboratory aging (a, c, e, g) and after (b, d, f, h) short-term aging in the Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (RTFOT), with different concentrations: without CS-NPs (a, b), with 0.1 wt.% CS-NPs (c, d), with 0.2 wt.% CS-NPs (e, f), and with 0.3 wt.% CS-NPs (e, g).
Figure 6Complex shear modulus G* and phase angle δ of bitumen modified with CS-NPs after UV aging of 6 days (a, c, e, g) and 12 days (b, d, f, h); bitumen samples of different concentrations: without CS-NPs (a, b), with 0.1 wt.% of CS-NPs (c, d), with 0.2 wt.% of CS-NPs (e, f), and with 0.3 wt.% of CS-NPs (e, g).
Figure 7Rutting resistance of bitumen modified with CS-NPs in unaged condition, in short-term aged condition (RTFOT), and in UV aged condition.
Bitumen threshold temperatures in different concentrations of CS-NPs before and after aging.
| Threshold temperatures (°C) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before aging (G*/sin δ = 1 kPa) | After aging (G*/sin δ = 2.2 kPa) | ||||||||||||||
| S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8s | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 | S15 | S16 |
| 72.8 | 73.1 | 73.4 | 73.1 | 73.0 | 72.4 | 72.9 | 72.7 | 73.9 | 73.9 | 73.3 | 74.2 | 74.8 | 74.1 | 73.9 | 74.6 |
Figure 8Schematic illustration of the CS-NPs action in the colloidal structure of bitumen.
Figure 9Aging indexes based on carbonyl and sulfoxide groups for different aging conditions.
Figure 10Index of viscosity aging (IVA) of control bitumen and of bitumen modified with CS-NPs.
Figure 11Softening point increment (SPI) of control bitumen and of aged bitumen modified with CS-NPs.
Figure 12DLS distribution, XRD pattern, and Fourier transform infrared spectra of (a) clay; and (b) fumed silica.
Figure 13Schematic illustration of multistep synthesis of CS-NPs.
Overview of sample aging processes.
| Sample no. | Content of CS-NPs (wt.%) | Ageing process | Sample no. | Content of CS-NPs (wt.%) | Aging process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | – | Unaged | S9 | – | 6d UV |
| S2 | 0.1 | Unaged | S10 | 0.1 | 6d UV |
| S3 | 0.2 | Unaged | S11 | 0.2 | 6d UV |
| S4 | 0.3 | Unaged | S12 | 0.3 | 6d UV |
| S5 | – | RTFO | S13 | – | 12d UV |
| S6 | 0.1 | RTFO | S14 | 0.1 | 12d UV |
| S7 | 0.2 | RTFO | S15 | 0.2 | 12d UV |
| S8 | 0.3 | RTFO | S16 | 0.3 | 12d UV |
Physical properties of bitumen sample.
| Physical properties | Value | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Ductility (@25°C, cm) | 100 | ASTM D113 |
| Softening point (°C) | 48.6 | ASTM D36 |
| Penetration (@25°C, 0.1 mm) | 63 | ASTM D5 |
| Density (kg/m3) | 1.03 | ASTM D70 |