Ling Long1, Yipan Zhu2, Zhenzi Li1, Haixia Zhang3, Lixia Liu1, Jialin Bai3. 1. College of Life Science and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730124, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of Pharmacy, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug Research, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Bioengineering & Biotechnology of State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730124, China.
Abstract
Changes in yak mitochondria by natural selection in a hypoxic environment could be utilized to understand adaptation to low-oxygen conditions. Therefore, the differences in proteome profile of skeletal muscle mitochondria from yak, dzo, and cattle were analyzed by mass spectrometry, which were then classified into 3 groups, comparing between yak and dzo, yak and cattle, and dzo and cattle. 376 unique mitochondrial proteins were identified, including 192, 191, and 281 proteins in the yak-dzo, yak-cattle, and dzo-cattle groups, respectively. NRDP1 and COQ8A were expressed at higher levels in yak and dzo compared to those in cattle, indicating higher endurance capacity of yak and dzo in a low-oxygen environment. Gene Ontology (GO) terms of biological processes were significantly enriched in oxidation-reduction process, and that of molecular functions and cellular component were enriched in oxidoreductase activity and the mitochondrion, respectively. The most significantly affected pathways in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and oxidative phosphorylation between the yak-cattle and dzo-cattle groups; while metabolic pathways, citrate cycle, and carbon metabolism were significantly affected pathways in the yak-dzo group. ATP synthases, MTHFD1, MDH2, and SDHB were the most enriched hub proteins in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. These results indicated that mammals living at high altitudes could possibly possess better bioenergy metabolism than those living in the plains. The key proteins identified in the present study may be exploited as candidate proteins for understanding and fine-tuning mammalian adaptation to high altitudes.
Changes in yak mitochondria by natural selection in a hypoxic environment could be utilized to understand adaptation to low-oxygen conditions. Therefore, the differences in proteome profile of skeletal muscle mitochondria from yak, dzo, and cattle were analyzed by mass spectrometry, which were then classified into 3 groups, comparing between yak and dzo, yak and cattle, and dzo and cattle. 376 unique mitochondrial proteins were identified, including 192, 191, and 281 proteins in the yak-dzo, yak-cattle, and dzo-cattle groups, respectively. NRDP1 and COQ8A were expressed at higher levels in yak and dzo compared to those in cattle, indicating higher endurance capacity of yak and dzo in a low-oxygen environment. Gene Ontology (GO) terms of biological processes were significantly enriched in oxidation-reduction process, and that of molecular functions and cellular component were enriched in oxidoreductase activity and the mitochondrion, respectively. The most significantly affected pathways in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and oxidative phosphorylation between the yak-cattle and dzo-cattle groups; while metabolic pathways, citrate cycle, and carbon metabolism were significantly affected pathways in the yak-dzo group. ATP synthases, MTHFD1, MDH2, and SDHB were the most enriched hub proteins in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. These results indicated that mammals living at high altitudes could possibly possess better bioenergy metabolism than those living in the plains. The key proteins identified in the present study may be exploited as candidate proteins for understanding and fine-tuning mammalian adaptation to high altitudes.
The yak (Bos grunniens) is a rare Chinese cattle species and is extremely
tolerant of harsh environments at high altitudes and low temperatures, which lends this
species an appreciable economic value in China. The majority of the population is located in
Tibet, where other livestock struggle to survive due to the difficult conditions [26]. Early research has revealed that, compared to other
ruminants, yaks have better oxygen transport and utilization due to their strong ability to
acclimatize to low-oxygen conditions, which includes high capacity of the lungs and heart
[41], high aerobic capacity [8], and high energy metabolism [39].Dzo, the offspring of female yak and male cattle, can adapt to formidable ecological
environments (e.g., high altitude, low pressure, and long spells of winter), while also
acclimatizing to lower altitudes and higher temperatures. Dzo and yak perform similarly in
low-oxygen environments, as characterized by a decreased respiratory response, indicating that
genetic factors may play an important role in the adaptation of yaks to low-oxygen conditions
[22, 33].Mitochondria are the key organelles for energy production in cells. The body takes in oxygen
via the lungs and transports it to cells through the circulatory system, eventually producing
ATP through cellular respiration and supplying the energy required for life [18]. Mitochondria have additional physiologically relevant
functions, such as producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) like superoxide anions, regulating
redox potential, transducing cellular redox signals, and regulating apoptosis and gene
expression [4, 31]. Mitochondria are flexible, changing their structure and function in animals to
adapt to low oxygen environments. Variations in the mitochondrial DNA and proteins can impact
mitochondrial adaptation and acclimatization to hypoxia [23].Proteomic analysis can be used to measure dynamic changes in protein components, with respect
to their expression level, post-translational modifications, and protein-protein interactions,
thereby revealing novel methods to assess protein function in the context of cellular behavior
[37]. Owing to the advantage of utilizing proteomics
for various applications, including protein identification, this technology is widely applied
in a variety of scientific fields. Mitochondria are relatively independent organelles and are
easily purified for proteomic analysis; therefore, mitochondrial proteins are ideal targets
for proteomic research compared to total proteins from whole cells [10, 28, 36].Yaks are adapted to low-oxygen environments, and their genetic characteristics have been
conserved due to the geographical isolation of the Tibetan plateau [26]. Changes in the yak mitochondria are due to natural selection in a
hypoxic environment, therefore this animal may be utilized as a model to gain a better
understanding of hypoxic adaptations. In this study, we performed a comparative proteomic
analysis of the mitochondrial proteins from yak, dzo, and cattle to explore differentially
expressed proteins with related functions and pathways, and construct a protein-protein
interaction network. Based on this, we could reveal a genetic mechanism for low-oxygen
adaptation and provide new clues for understanding the mitochondrial function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement
All procedures involved in the handling and care of animals were in accordance with the
China Practice for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by China
Zoological Society.
Animals and sample collection
The animals used in this study were from the grazing area of the village of Manrima
(altitude, 3,585 m; 102°04′ E longitude; 33°45′ N latitude). This region is characterized
by its high altitude, low annual average temperature (1.2°C), short agricultural season
(from June to September), and substantial seasonal variation in food supply [21]. For the purpose of this study, the soil in this
place was classified as alpine meadow. Nine yaks, nine cattle-yak hybrids (dzo), and nine
Simmental beef cattle (18 months of age) were selected randomly from corresponding healthy
herds. All species were provided with feed and water ad libitum. After
slaughter, the gastrocnemius muscle was dissected and immediately frozen in liquid
nitrogen for the extraction of mitochondrial protein. These samples were then used in a
shotgun LC-MS/MS approach, combined with tandem mass tags (TMT) peptide labeling, for
quantification of the proteome.
Tissue and protein extraction
We collected 9 skeletal muscle samples each from yak, dzo, and cattle and randomly mixed
3 samples from the same species into a single test sample. Therefore, each mixed sample
consisted of 3 mixed skeletal muscle samples, one each from yak (1 g/sample), dzo (1
g/sample), and cattle (1 g/sample). The 3 groups of yaks were named 126 (yak-1), 127N
(yak-2), and 127C (yak-3). The 3 groups of dzo were named 128N
(dzo-1), 128C (dzo-2), and 129N (dzo-3). The 3 groups of cattle were named 129C
(cattle-1), 130N (cattle-2), and 130C (cattle-3). The group with mixed samples from all
the species were named 131 (mixed) (Supplementary Fig.
1). Crude mitochondrial fractions (10 µg/sample) were extracted
using a crude extraction and separation of mitochondria from animal cells/tissues kit
(GMS10006.1 v.A; Genmed Scientifics Inc., Botson, MA, USA).
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE)
SDS-PAGE was prepared by adding the separation gel to the assembled double-layered glass
plate for casting gels, and the upper layer was kept covered in isopropanol at room
temperature until the gel condensed. Then, the isopropanol was removed with a filter paper
and the concentrated gel was added to the glass compartment, the pre-washed comb was
inserted, and condensed at room temperature. Next, electrophoresis was performed by
placing the prepared polyacrylamide gel in the electrophoresis tank and adding the running
buffer and samples. The samples were initially run at a voltage of 60 V for 30 min, and
then at 120 V for another 2 hr until the bromophenol blue was about 5 mm from the lower
edge of the gel. Finally, the protein gel was separated and stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue G-250.
Protein labeling and MS analysis
Trypsin (Mass Spectrometry Grade; Promega, Midison, WI, USA) was used to generate
peptides. The target protein was dissolved in 8 M urea/50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8)/5 mM DTT
(e.g., 2.5 µg of trypsin per 100 µg of protein) and
incubated at 37°C for 1 hr. Immediately before use, TMT label reagents
(TMT10plexTM Isobaric Mass Tag Labeling Kit, 3 × 0.8 mg, 90114, Thermo
Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were allowed to equilibrate to room temperature, added to 41
µl of anhydrous acetonitrile (ACN) in 0.8 mg vials, and the reagent was
allowed to dissolve for 5 min with occasional vortexing. 41 µl of the TMT
label reagent was added to each 25–100 µg aliquot of the protein sample.
The reaction was incubated for 1 hr at room temperature. Then, 8 µl of 5%
hydroxylamine was added to the sample and incubated for 15 min to quench the reaction. The
content of each tube was mixed by vortexing; it was centrifuged to collect the solution,
and the sample was dried in a vacuum freeze dryer for TMT analysis.
Dried samples were resuspended in 100 µl of buffer A (H2O
with 0.1% formic acid (FA)). RPLC analysis was carried out using an Agilent 1200 HPLC
System (Agilent, California, CA, USA); the HPLC column (Narrow-Bore, 2.1 × 150 mm, 5
µm) was from Agilent. Separation was performed at a rate of 0.3
ml/min using a nonlinear binary gradient (Supplementary Table 1) starting with buffer A and transitioning to
buffer B (ACN with 0.1% FA). The first fraction was collected during 0–5 min, then each
fraction was collected with a 4.5-min interval between 6–45 min, and the last fraction was
collected from the 46–50-min timeframe, with a total of 10 fractions. Each fraction was
dried in a vacuum freeze dryer for subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis.
LC-MS/MS analysis
Samples were resuspended with nano-RPLC buffer A (0.1% FA, 2% ACN). Online nano-RPLC was
carried out using the EASY-nLC 1000 System (Thermo Scientific). The samples were loaded on
a nano-RPLC trap column (PepMap100 C18, 3 µm, 75 µm ×
20-mm, nanoViper, Thermo Fisher Dionex, Waltham, MA, USA) and washed with the nano-RPLC
buffer A at a rate of 2 µl/min for 10 min. An elution gradient of 5–35%
ACN (0.1% FA) for 70 min was used in an analytical column (PepMap100 C18, 2
µm, 75 µm × 150 mm, nanoViper; Thermo Fisher Dionex).
Data acquisition was performed on the Q Exactive System (Thermo Scientific) fitted with a
Nanospray. The Q Exactive setup was operated using the data-dependent top-20 parameters
with 70 k resolution for full MS scan, 17.5 k resolution for high energy collisional
dissociation MS/MS scans, and a dynamic exclusion time of 30 sec. Full MS scans were
acquired in the Q Exactive Orbitrap mass analyzer (Thermo Scientific) over a 300–1,800 m/z
range with a mass resolution of 70,000 (at 200 m/z). The 12 most intense peaks at a charge
state ≥2 were fragmented in the high energy collisional dissociation collision cell with a
normalized collision energy of 27%. Tandem mass spectra were acquired in the same setup
with a mass resolution of 35,000 at 200 m/z.
Protein identification and quantification
Spectral data files were analyzed using the Proteome Discoverer 1.3 software (Thermo
Scientific) and the SEQUEST® search engine (Thermo Scientific), constrained
with a precursor mass tolerance of 10 ppm and fragment mass tolerance of 0.02 Da.
Carbamidomethylation (+57.021 Da) of cysteine and TMT isobaric labeling (+229.163 Da) of
lysine were set as static modifications, while TMT labeling of the peptide and protein
N-termini, deamidation of asparagine and glutamine (+0.984 Da), oxidation of methionine
(+15.996 Da), and formation of pyro-glutamate from glutamine on the peptide N-terminus
(−17.027 Da) were considered to be dynamic. Data was searched against a Swiss-Prot
complete bovine database with a 1% false discovery rate (FDR) criteria. The TMT6plex
quantification method available in the Proteome Discoverer 1.3 software was used to
calculate reporter ratios with mass tolerances of 0.01 Da without applying isotopic
correction factors. Protein ratios were expressed as the median value of the ratios for
all quantifiable spectra of the peptides pertaining to each protein.
Functional and pathway enrichment analysis
The biological functions of differentially expressed proteins were investigated by
comparison with the Gene Ontology (GO) database (http://www.geneontology.org/). The
GO enrichment analysis was based on the mainstream databases DAVID6.7 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) and QuickGO (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/),
which were used to describe the GO classification, annotation, and enrichment analysis of
the different screened proteins. Information on the differentially expressed proteins was
also obtained from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html), which could assess the signaling
pathways. Based on the enrichment results, a customized horizontal version of the
histogram was assembled using the significant vertical version of the top 10 entries in
the column [13].
PPI network construction
Analysis of protein-protein interactions (PPI) was based on the STRING database (v11.0,
https://string-db.org/), which is a database that details functional
relationships between proteins, thereby allowing for prediction of functions. This system
has enabled searching for interactions between known proteins and predicted ones, thereby
uncovering the roles of the latter in cellular growth, development, metabolism,
differentiation, and apoptosis [14, 20]. In this study, we constructed a PPI network based
on the STRING (http://string.embl.de/) and Cytoscape (http://www.cytoscape.org/) software,
and visualized the distribution characteristics of the top 10 up- and down-regulated
proteins [20, 32].
RESULTS
Identification of differentially expressed proteins
Using proteomics-based methods, 576 mitochondrial proteins and 376 differentially
expressed proteins (fold change >1.2 or <0.6 were set as cutoff values) were
observed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The identified proteins were classified into 3 groups,
namely the yak-dzo, yak-cattle, and dzo-cattle groups. The analysis identified 192
differentially expressed proteins in the yak-dzo group (33 upregulated and 159
downregulated proteins), 191 differentially expressed proteins in the yak-cattle group
(115 upregulated and 76 downregulated proteins), and 281 differentially expressed proteins
in the dzo-cattle group (231 upregulated and 50 downregulated proteins). Specific
information regarding the differentially expressed proteins is shown in Supplementary Table 2 and the heat map of
differentially expressed mitochondrial proteins is represented in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Heatmap of mitochondrial proteins in yak, dzo, and cattle. Red, up-regulation;
green, down-regulation.
Heatmap of mitochondrial proteins in yak, dzo, and cattle. Red, up-regulation;
green, down-regulation.
GO term enrichment analysis
The GO enrichment analysis was performed using the David6.7 and the QuickGO databases for
GO classification, annotation, and enrichment analysis of screened proteins. In the
yak-dzo group, differentially expressed proteins were related to redox, small molecule
metabolism, and cellular respiration processes (Fig.
2A). The differentially expressed proteins in the yak-cattle group were enriched in
redox processes and the electron transport chain (Fig.
2B). On the other hand, the differentially expressed proteins in the dzo-cattle
group were enriched in cellular respiration, ATP metabolic, and redox processes (Fig. 2C). Using the GO cell component analysis,
differentially expressed proteins were found to be significantly enriched in the
mitochondrion in all 3 groups. Molecular functions in all the 3 groups were identified as
important for oxidoreductase activity and hydrogen ion transmembrane transporter activity
(Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of significantly differentially expressed proteins in
the yak-dzo, yak-cattle, and dzo-cattle groups. GO analysis in (groups): A, yak-dzo;
B, yak-cattle; and C, dzo-cattle. The entries in each category are sorted by their
–log (P-value) value from left to right; and the entries on the
left side correspond to higher significance.
Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of significantly differentially expressed proteins in
the yak-dzo, yak-cattle, and dzo-cattle groups. GO analysis in (groups): A, yak-dzo;
B, yak-cattle; and C, dzo-cattle. The entries in each category are sorted by their
–log (P-value) value from left to right; and the entries on the
left side correspond to higher significance.
KEGG pathway analysis
The most significantly enriched pathways in the 3 groups from KEGG analysis are shown in
Fig. 3. Differentially expressed proteins in the yak-dzo group were enriched in metabolic
pathways, including citrate cycle and carbon metabolism (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Table
3). However, in the yak-cattle and dzo-cattle groups, differentially expressed
proteins were significantly enriched in those involved in Parkinson’s disease,
Huntington’s disease, and oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 3B and 3C and Supplementary Tables 4 and
5).
Fig. 3.
Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of
differentially-expressed proteins. KEGG pathways in (groups): A, yak-dzo; B,
yak-cattle; and C, dzo-cattle.
Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of
differentially-expressed proteins. KEGG pathways in (groups): A, yak-dzo; B,
yak-cattle; and C, dzo-cattle.Using information from the STRING database, the top 40 hub nodes were identified in the
PPI network (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Tables 6–8). In the
yak-dzo group, the top 3 hub proteins were malate dehydrogenase (MDH2), ATP synthase
subunit beta (ATP5B), and methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase, cyclohydrolase and
formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase 1 (MTHFD1) (Fig.
4A). In the yak-cattle group, the top 3 hub proteins were ATP synthase subunit O
(ATP5O), ATP synthase subunit gamma (ATP5C1), and ATP synthase subunit d (ATP5H) (Fig. 4B). ATP5C1, ATP5O, and succinate dehydrogenase
[ubiquinone] iron-sulfur subunit (SDHB) were the top 3 hub proteins in the dzo-cattle
group (Fig. 4C).
Fig. 4.
Top 40 hub proteins represented by the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network.
PPI network in (groups): A, yak-dzo; B, yak-cattle; and C, dzo-cattle. The top 3 hub
proteins are indicated by red points, and other proteins are indicated by green
points.
Top 40 hub proteins represented by the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network.
PPI network in (groups): A, yak-dzo; B, yak-cattle; and C, dzo-cattle. The top 3 hub
proteins are indicated by red points, and other proteins are indicated by green
points.
DISCUSSION
Research into the molecular mechanisms that enable high-altitude adaptation in mammals of
the plateau is important for preventing and treating hypoxia and related diseases [2, 3, 12, 17, 19, 25]. The yak,
an essential animal in Tibet, provides food, shelter, fuel, and transport for the local
people, largely due to its ability to adapt to cold, low-oxygen, and low-atmospheric
pressure environments. The differentiation of yaks and cattle dates back to 50,000 years,
and both are classified as bovine species. The dzo is the offspring of yak and cattle, cows,
or other common bovines [15]. The genomes of yaks and
cattle have been sequenced, thereby enabling studies into yak-cattle hybrids for research on
low-oxygen adaptation [6, 9, 30]. Many researches have
focused on comparison of yaks and cattle at the level of nucleic acid sequences and
genomics, but differences at the mitochondrial protein level have not been measured.
Especially, those for the dzo remain to be examined. To explore the proteomic level
differences in yak mitochondria and their role in low-oxygen adaptation mechanisms, a
bioinformatics approach was utilized to compare yak, dzo, and cattle. This study identified
376 differentially expressed proteins, including 192 proteins in the yak-dzo group, 191
proteins in the yak-cattle group, and 281 proteins in the dzo-cattle group.E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NRDP1 was the protein with the most significantly different
expression pattern in both the yak-dzo and yak-cattle groups. The protein encoded by the
RNF41 gene contains a really interesting new gene (RING) finger domain,
which is a motif present in a variety of functionally distinct proteins and is known to be
involved in protein–protein interactions and in maintaining stability mediated by the
ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) [42]. CLEC16A
could form an ubiquitin-dependent tripartite complex with NRDP1 (RNF41) and USP8.
Maintenance of the CLEC16A-NRDP1-USP8 mitophagy complex is known to be necessary for maximal
cellular respiration and maintenance of cellular bioenergetics [5, 16, 27]. The cytokine receptor sorting and processing is also controlled by
RNF41 and USP8 cross-regulation [7]. Coenzyme Q8A
(COQ8A) encodes a mitochondrial protein similar to yeastATP-binding cassette transporter 1
(ABC1), which functions in a membrane protein complex involved in electron transport in the
respiratory chain, and was the protein with the most significant changes in expression in
the dzo and cattle groups. Taken together, NRDP1 (RNF41) and COQ8A are expressed at higher
levels in yak and dzo compared to that in cattle. Since these proteins are involved in
mitochondrial energy metabolism, this may represent the possible mechanism(s) underlying the
low-oxygen adaptation observed in yaks.Among the 3 groups, GO terms were significantly enriched in redox processes and
oxidoreductase activities. These processes mainly occur in the mitochondria, and the
analysis indicated close association of this organelle to hypoxia adaptation. The most
significant pathways identified in the KEGG analysis were Parkinson’s disease and metabolic
pathways. The yak has enhanced oxygen transport and utilization due to high energy
generation from the metabolic pathway [39].
Additionally, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress are known to play important
roles in Parkinson’s disease [34].The most enriched hub proteins were ATP5O, ATP5B, ATP5H, ATP5C1, MTHFD1, MDH2, and SDHB.
MTHFD1 in the cytoplasm reverses the action of methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase, and
exhibits 3 distinct enzymatic activities in the interconversion of 1-carbon derivatives of
tetrahydrofolate [40]. ATP5O, ATP5B, ATP5C1, and
ATP5H are related to ATP synthase and hydrogen transport in the mitochondria. MDH2 is the
major non-mitochondrial isozyme that catalyzes a step for utilization of C2 compounds [1, 24]. SDH is one
of the markers for mitochondrial function, as it is important for the tricarboxylic acid
(TCA) cycle. Loss of SDHB expression leads to decreased SDH activity, which causes
dysfunction in the mitochondrial TCA cycle, thereby resulting in impaired energy metabolism
in tumor cells [11, 38, 44]. These proteins mainly take part in
electron transport in the respiratory chain and bioenergy metabolism, which indicate that
they may have some contributions in low-oxygen adaptation mechanisms.In summary, we have identified sets of differentially expressed proteins among yak, dzo,
and cattle by LC-MS/MS analysis and provided a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of
these proteins. RNF41 was the protein with the most significant changes in expression in the
yak-dzo and yak-cattle groups, while COQ8A was the counterpart identified in the dzo-cattle
group. High-altitude hypoxia can regulate the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain
[29, 35,
43], and change in the mitochondrial structure and
function was one of the important mechanisms for animals to overcome the low-oxygen
environment. Yak and dzo have a higher endurance capacity than cattle in low-oxygen
environment. Comparison of the differentially expressed proteins identified in these 3
groups of related animals facilitates greater understanding of high-altitude hypoxic stress
adaptations, which may be useful in reducing the incidence of human high-altitude
disease.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with
other people or organizations that could be construed as an inappropriate influence on our
work. Additionally, there is no professional or personal interest of any nature or kind in
any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position of
this work.
Authors: Tatum S Simonson; Yingzhong Yang; Chad D Huff; Haixia Yun; Ga Qin; David J Witherspoon; Zhenzhong Bai; Felipe R Lorenzo; Jinchuan Xing; Lynn B Jorde; Josef T Prchal; RiLi Ge Journal: Science Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Chunzhang Yang; Joey C Matro; Kristin M Huntoon; Donald Y Ye; Thanh T Huynh; Stephanie M J Fliedner; Jan Breza; Zhengping Zhuang; Karel Pacak Journal: FASEB J Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Lauren Fishbein; Shana Merrill; Douglas L Fraker; Debbie L Cohen; Katherine L Nathanson Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ada Fiorini; Rukhsana Sultana; Eugenio Barone; Giovanna Cenini; Marzia Perluigi; Cesare Mancuso; Jian Cai; Jon B Klein; Daret St Clair; D Allan Butterfield Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 3.240