Literature DB >> 32641598

Clinicopathological significance of CD79a expression in classic Hodgkin lymphoma.

Akio Sakatani1,2, Takuro Igawa1, Takeshi Okatani1,3, Megumu Fujihara2, Hideki Asaoku3, Yasuharu Sato1,4, Tadashi Yoshino1.   

Abstract

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a lymphoid neoplasia characterized by the presence of large tumor cells, referred to as Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells, originating from B-cells in an inflammatory background. As the clinical significance of B-cell markers has yet to be fully elucidated, this study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological significance of CD79a in 55 patients with CHL. They were immunohistochemically divided into two groups, comprising of 20 CD79a-positive and 35 CD79a-negative patients. There was no significant correlation between CD79a and CD20 expression (rs = 0.125, P = 0.362). CD79a-positive patients were significantly older at onset (P = 0.011). There was no significant correlation between CD79a-positivity and clinical stage (P = 0.203), mediastinal involvement (P = 0.399), extranodal involvement (P = 0.749), or laboratory findings, including serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (P = 1) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (P = 0.251). There were significant differences in overall survival (OS) (P = 0.005) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.007) between CD79a-positive and CD79a-negative patients (5-year OS: 64.6% and 90.5%; 5-year PFS: 44.0% and 76.6%, respectively). Five patients in whom the majority (> 80%) of HRS cells expressed CD79a consisted of 4 males and 1 female aged between 52 and 81 years; 4 of them were in a limited clinical stage. We concluded that CD79a-positive CHL may have unique clinicopathological features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD79a; classic Hodgkin lymphoma; immunohistochemistry; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32641598      PMCID: PMC7596911          DOI: 10.3960/jslrt.20010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Hematop        ISSN: 1346-4280


INTRODUCTION

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a lymphoid neoplasia characterized by the presence of large pathognomonic cells, such as Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells, in an inflammatory background. In Japan, CHL represents 5–10% of all lymphomas, with a bimodal age distribution, and peak incidences being between 15 and 34 years of age and between 55 and 84 years of age. In contrast, peak incidences of CHL in Western countries, such as the United States or Germany, are predominantly in a younger cohort. The majority of patients with CHL have a good clinical course with chemotherapy, including doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) therapy, and/or radiation therapy. Currently, the 5-year survival rate for patients has been reported to be over 95% in a limited stage, and over 80% in an advanced stage., The origin of HRS cells had been unknown until recently because they frequently express markers of different hematopoietic lineages., Recent studies revealed HRS cells to have clonally rearranged immunoglobulin genes with a high load of somatic mutations.- Most cases of CHL originate from germinal center B-cells. However, immunohistochemical analysis often cannot detect B-cell markers, such as CD20 and CD79a, in HRS cells.,- In contrast, the expression of PAX5 is usually conserved. Expression of OCT-2 and BOB.1, essential transcription factors for immunoglobulin genes, can also be detected in some cases.,, Previous studies reported varying results regarding the expression patterns of these B-cell markers,, although their clinical significance has yet to be fully elucidated. We therefore aimed to clarify the clinicopathological significance of CD79a by comparing CD79a-positive and CD79a-negative CHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Fifty-five patients, who were initially diagnosed with CHL, were examined at Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital via excisional biopsy between 2002 and 2016. Original diagnoses of CHL were confirmed to meet the diagnostic criteria of the WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th Edition. Patients, who had been administered immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate, before the initial diagnosis of CHL were excluded. The use of patient specimens and medical records was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

The tissue samples used consisted of 51 lymph nodal and 4 anterior mediastinal biopsy specimens. The spleen was also examined for one patient. Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Four-micron-thick sections were stained with HE. Immunohistochemical studies were performed using standard manual methods with the Dako REAL™ EnVision™ Detection Systems or via the automated stainer BOND-III. The primary antibodies used were as follows: anti-CD30 (Ber-H2, 1:100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), anti-CD15 (BY87, 1:40, Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany), anti-CD20 (L26, 1:200, Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), anti-CD79a (JCB117, 1:400, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), anti-PAX5 (1EW, 1:100, Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany), anti-CD3 (PS1, pre-dilute, Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), anti-BOB.1 (sc-955, 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti-OCT-2 (sc-233, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), and PD-L1 (E1L3N, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Based on previous studies, a sample was considered positive if ≥10% of the tumor cells were stained. Furthermore, CD20 and CD79a expression was classified into 11 groups by every 10% cut-off value. Dual immunohistochemistry for CD79a and CD30 was performed for two representative patients using the Leica ChromoPlex™ 1 Dual Detection for BOND and BOND-III stainer. The clones of primary antibodies, and their dilution, source, enzyme, and chromogen for primary and secondary stains were as follows: anti-CD79a (JCB117, 1:25, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), horseradish peroxidase, DAB; anti-CD30 (Ber-H2, 1:20, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), alkaline phosphatase, and Fast Red, respectively. Detection of latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection was performed by means of in-situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBERs) using PNA Probe/Fluorescein and anti-fluorescein isothiocyanate rabbit polyclonal antibody.

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test, the chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to examine the differences in characteristics between two groups, as appropriate. Correlation between the proportions of CD79a- and CD20-positive cells was examined by the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analyzing patient survival data. The log-rank test was applied to analyze the differences in survival; overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered for the evaluation of survival. The results were considered significant if the P-value was less than 0.05. All data were analyzed using R version 3.4.2.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological findings

Clinical characteristics of the 55 patients with CHL at the time of biopsy are summarized in Table 1. The patients included 34 males and 21 females, with a median age of 51 years (range, 15–86 years). According to the Lugano Classification 2014, 35 patients were in a limited clinical stage (CS) (stage I or II) and 20 were in an advanced CS (stage III or IV). Thirty-eight (69.1%) patients underwent biopsy from cervical lymph nodes, whereas 7 (12.7%) underwent biopsy from infra-diaphragmatic regions. Extranodal involvement included bone marrow, subcutis, lung, liver, pleural effusion and/or pleura, kidney, and stomach in 8, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. Histological subtypes consisted of 27 cases with mixed cellularity (MCCHL), 20 cases with nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), 6 cases with lymphocyte-rich (LRCHL), and 2 unspecified cases. Forty-eight patients (87.3%) were administered ABVD therapy, 12 of them also received radiotherapy. Five patients only received radiotherapy. The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 77.8% and 57.1%, respectively.
Table 1

Patient characteristics, and histological subtypes of CD79a-positive and CD79a-negative CHL

VariablesAll CHL casesCD79a-positive CHLCD79a-negative CHLP
Number of patients552035
Age, median (range)51 (15–86)69 (15–82)37 (17–86)0.011 †
Sex, male34 (61.8)14 (70.0)20 (57.1)0.399
LDH > normal *15 (27.8)5 (26.3) *10 (28.6)1
sIL-2R > normal *45 (81.8)14 (73.7) *31 (88.6)0.251
Clinical stage0.203 ‡
I9 (16.4)6 (30.0)3 (8.6)
II26 (47.3)7 (35.0)19 (54.3)
III9 (16.4)3 (15.0)6 (17.1)
IV11 (20.0)4 (20.0)7 (20.0)
Mediastinal involvement30 (54.5)9 (45.0)21 (60.0)0.399
Extranodal involvement **13 (23.6)4 (20.0)9 (24.3)0.749
Bone marrow8 (14.5)3 (15.0)5 (14.3)1
Others9 (16.4)2 (10.0)7 (25.0)0.462
Histological subtype, specified0.108 ‡
Mixed cellularity27 (49.1)6 (30.0)21 (60.0)
Nodular sclerosis20 (36.4)10 (50.0)10 (28.6)
Lymphocyte-rich6 (10.9)3 (15.0)3 (8.6)
Histological subtype, unspecified2 (3.6)1 (5.0)1 (2.9)
Initial treatmentN/A
Chemotherapy only38 (69.1)13 (65.0)25 (71.4)
ABVD36 (65.5)12 (60.0)24 (68.6)
Other regimens2 (3.6)1 (5.0)1 (2.9)
Radiotherapy only5 (9.1)4 (20.0)1 (2.9)
Combined therapy12 (21.8)3 (15.0)9 (25.7)
ABVD + radiotherapy12 (21.8)3 (15.0)9 (25.7)
Overall survival, months0.005 §
MedianNot reached141.0Not reached
Range3–1964–1813–196
Five-year survival rate (%)80.264.690.5
Progression-free survival, months0.007 §
MedianNot reached28.0Not reached
Range0–1832–1760–183
Five-year survival rate (%)63.744.076.6

* Laboratory data were not obtained for one patient

** Mediastinal and splenic lesions are regarded as nodal involvement.

CHL: classic Hodgkin lymphoma; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor.

Fisher’s exact test, two-sided

† Mann-Whitney U test.

‡ Chi-square test.

§ Log-rank test.

N/A, Not applicable.

* Laboratory data were not obtained for one patient ** Mediastinal and splenic lesions are regarded as nodal involvement. CHL: classic Hodgkin lymphoma; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor. Fisher’s exact test, two-sided † Mann-Whitney U test. ‡ Chi-square test. § Log-rank test. N/A, Not applicable.

CD79a expression

Out of the 55 patients with CHL, 20 were positive for CD79a (Fig. 1); 3 patients with 10–20%, 3 with 20–30%, 5 with 30–40%, 4 with 40–50%, none with 50–60%, 60–70%, or 70–80%, 1 with 80–90%, and 4 with 90–100% (Fig. 2). Most of the CD79a-positive cells (19 patients) exhibited weaker staining than normal B-cells and plasmacytes. Each HRS cell demonstrated homogenous CD79a staining intensity inside the cytoplasm.
Fig. 1

(a–c) Classic Hodgkin lymphoma with CD79a expression (> 90%). (a) HE-stained Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells distributed among non-neoplastic small lymphocytes and histiocytes. (b) Neoplastic cells identified based on CD30 staining. (c) Most HRS cells were positive for CD79a and showed variable staining intensity (arrowhead). (d) Dual immunohistochemistry of CD30 (Fast Red) and CD79a (DAB) in another case of classic Hodgkin lymphoma with CD79a expression (30–40%) in which CD79a-positive HRS cells expressed CD30, as indicated by an arrowhead.

Fig. 2

Scatterplot of the proportion of CD20-positive (x-axis) and CD79a-positive (y-axis) HRS cells. No significant correlation was found between these B-cell specific antigens (r = 0.125, P = 0.362).

(a–c) Classic Hodgkin lymphoma with CD79a expression (> 90%). (a) HE-stained Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells distributed among non-neoplastic small lymphocytes and histiocytes. (b) Neoplastic cells identified based on CD30 staining. (c) Most HRS cells were positive for CD79a and showed variable staining intensity (arrowhead). (d) Dual immunohistochemistry of CD30 (Fast Red) and CD79a (DAB) in another case of classic Hodgkin lymphoma with CD79a expression (30–40%) in which CD79a-positive HRS cells expressed CD30, as indicated by an arrowhead. Scatterplot of the proportion of CD20-positive (x-axis) and CD79a-positive (y-axis) HRS cells. No significant correlation was found between these B-cell specific antigens (r = 0.125, P = 0.362). Dual immunohistochemistry in a selected case demonstrated some HRS cells to be both CD30- and CD79a-positive, whereas others were CD30-positive but CD79a-negative.

CD20 expression and its correlation with CD79a

Out of the 55 patients, 25 were positive for CD20; 15 patients with 10–20%, 4 with 20–30%, 1 with 30–40%, 2 with 40–50%, 2 with 50–60%, none with 60–70%, 1 with 70–80%, and none with 80–90% or 90–100% (Fig. 2). Irrespective of the strength of the staining intensity, it was generally confined to the plasma membrane. There was no significant correlation between CD79a and CD20 expression (r = 0.125, P = 0.362).

PAX5 expression

PAX5 was immunohistochemically examined in 15 CD79a-positive and 20 CD20-positive patients. Ten were positive for PAX5 in the CD79a-positive group, in contrast to 8 in the CD20-positive group (P = 0.141).

Comparison of the characteristics of patients with CHL based on CD79a expression

Patient characteristics were compared between CD79a-positive and -negative CHL patients (Table 1). CD79a-positive patients were significantly older in age at onset (P = 0.011). There was no significant correlation between CD79a expression and laboratory disease characteristics, including serum levels of LDH (P = 1) and sIL-2R (P = 0.251), CS (P = 0.203), mediastinal involvement (P = 0.399), extranodal involvement (P = 0.749), or the histological subtype (P = 0.108). However, the OS and PFS of CD79a-positive patients were significantly inferior to those of CD79a-negative patients (P = 0.005 for OS and P = 0.007 for PFS) (Fig. 3). The 5-year OS rates for CD79a-positive and negative patients were 64.6% and 90.5%, respectively; the PFS rates were 44.0% and 76.6%, respectively. Among 7 CD79a-positive patients with advanced-stage disease (CS III or IV), 3 exhibited disease progression and 2 died despite receiving therapy. In contrast, among 13 CD79a-negative patients with advanced-stage disease, 2 exhibited disease progression and 1 died.
Fig. 3

Survival curves of CHL patients with or without CD79a expression. (a) Overall survival (OS). (b) Progression-free survival (PFS). There were significant differences between the OS (P = 0.005) and PFS (P = 0.007) of the two groups.

Survival curves of CHL patients with or without CD79a expression. (a) Overall survival (OS). (b) Progression-free survival (PFS). There were significant differences between the OS (P = 0.005) and PFS (P = 0.007) of the two groups. Subsequently, the proportion of CD79a expression in HRS cells was assessed between younger (< 50 years of age) and older (≥ 50 years) age groups (Fig. 4). The older age group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of CD79a than the younger age group (P = 0.001). Of note, all patients with CD79a expression higher than 80% were in the older age group. In addition, the proportion of CD79a expression was compared between limited (CS I or II) and advanced stage groups (Fig. 4); both groups had a similar CD79a distribution (P = 0.884).
Fig. 4

Proportions of CD79a-positive HRS cells according to age and disease stage. Each black triangle or white rectangle indicates a patient distinguished by age. There was no difference in the proportion of CD79a expression between limited and advanced stage groups (P = 0.884). Older patients were more likely to have more CD79a-positive cells (P = 0.001).

Proportions of CD79a-positive HRS cells according to age and disease stage. Each black triangle or white rectangle indicates a patient distinguished by age. There was no difference in the proportion of CD79a expression between limited and advanced stage groups (P = 0.884). Older patients were more likely to have more CD79a-positive cells (P = 0.001).

Clinicopathological features of 5 patients with a high proportion of CD79a-positive HRS cells

Clinicopathological findings in 5 patients in whom the majority (> 80%) of HRS cells expressed CD79a are described in Table 2. The patients consisted of 4 males and 1 female, aged between 52 and 81 years. At the time of biopsy, patients 1–4 were in a limited stage, whereas patient 5 was in CS III. Patient 5 was in CS II at initial presentation without mediastinal involvement. The four patients in a limited stage were only administered radiotherapy; 3 of them achieved complete response (CR), whereas one had progressive disease (PD). In contrast, patient 5 was treated using ABVD therapy, resulting in CR. Patient 2 relapsed after 26 months and died of the disease after 55 months. Patient 3 also died of the disease after 141 months. All other patients survived during the observation period between 52 and 176 months. The histological subtypes consisted of 3 MCCHL and 2 NSCHL. The intensities of CD79a were weaker than in normal B-cells in all patients, except in the splenic lesion of patient 5. Percentages of CD20-positive HRS cells were small (< 20%) in all 5 lymph node specimens, in contrast to that in the splenic lesion of patient 5 (70–80%). EBV was not detected in HRS cells of any patient.
Table 2

Clinicopathological features of patients in whom the majority (≥80%) of HRS cells were positive for CD79a

Patient no.12345
Tissue siteLNLNLNLNLNSpleen
Initial symptoms/Reason for consultationfollow-up PET-CT for B-cell lymphomaCT for detailed examination of rheumatoid arthritisLN swellingLN swellingAbdominal pain and fever of unknown origin
Clinical findings at biopsy
Sex/AgeM/74M/81M/66F/52M/65
Site of involvementBilateral cervical LN and mediastinumLeft axillary LNLeft cervical LNRight cervical LNPara-aortic, mesenteric, and bilateral axillary LN,mediastinum, and spleen
Bulky tumor, ≥10 cm
Clinical stageIIIIIIII
LDH (U/L)128193141152313
sIL-2R (U/mL)4321,1103916473,690
Initial treatmentRadiotherapyRadiotherapyRadiotherapyRadiotherapyABVD
Initial responseCRCRPDCRCR
Outcome after biopsyAlive without relapse of either lymphoma, 52 monthsRelapsed at 26 months, died of disease, 55 monthsProgression at 4 months, died of disease, 141 monthsAlive without relapse,67 monthsDevelopment of B-cell lymphoma at 140 months,CR, alive without relapse of CHL, 176 months
Pathological findings
Histological subtypeMixed cellularityNodular sclerosisMixed cellularityMixed cellularityNodular sclerosisNodular sclerosis
Size and number of neoplastic cellsMedial to large, medialSmall to medial, medialMedial to large, numerousSmall to medial, fewSmall to large, numerousSmall to large, numerous
CD79a (percentage and intensity)+, 90–100, moderate+, 90–100, weak+, 80–90, moderate+, 90–100, moderate+, 90–100, moderate+, 90–100, strong
CD20 (percentage)+, 10–20+, 10–20+, 10–20+, 70–80
PAX5 (intensity)+, weak+, moderate+, moderate+, weak+, moderate+, moderate
CD30++++++
CD15++
OCT-2++±±++
BOB.1
PD-L1 (percentage and intensity)+, 50–60, moderate+, 10–20, weak+, 20–30, moderate+, 70–80, moderate+, 90–100, strong+, 90–100, strong
EBER

HRS cell: Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cell; LN: lymph node; CHL: classic Hodgkin lymphoma; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor.

CR: complete response; PD: progressive disease; ABVD: adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine.

HRS cell: Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cell; LN: lymph node; CHL: classic Hodgkin lymphoma; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; sIL-2R: soluble interleukin-2 receptor. CR: complete response; PD: progressive disease; ABVD: adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine.

DISCUSSION

In this study, 36.4% of the CHL patients were positive for CD79a. This proportion was higher than that reported in previous studies (5.7 to 36.0%; Table 3).-,- Cut-off values were not associated with the higher proportion of CD79a-positive patients because they were set in accordance with the previous studies at 10%.,-,,, Medium-sized Hodgkin cells were difficult to distinguish morphologically from histiocytes using HE or CD79a single-staining. Double immunohistochemistry of CD79a and CD30 confirmed our evaluation of CD79a-positivity based on single staining to be mostly accurate. A possible reason for the high proportion of CD79a in the present study was the age distribution. Our study revealed that HRS cells in older patients with CHL, especially older patients with NSCHL, often expressed CD79a. A previous study reported that patients older than 50 years of age had a higher proportion of CD79a-positive cells (7 out of 17 patients). An epidemiological study in Japan reported the second peak incidence of NSCHL to be in patients older than 55 years, which is not observed in Western countries.- Although the data on patient age in the studies listed in Table 3 are insufficient, we consider our current study to have included proportionately more older patients than the previous reports. Of note, CD79a expression was also more common in children. A previous study reported that LRCHL comprised more CD79a-positive cases (42.9%). Our current study included only 6 cases of LRCHL (10.9%).
Table 3

Previous reports on immunohistochemical positivity of CD20 and CD79a in CHL

ReferenceCD20-positive cases, n/N (%)CD79a-positive cases, n/N (%)Clone of CD79aCut-offvalue (%)
Present study25/55 (45.5)20/55 (36.4)JCB11710
Korkolopoulou et al.,22 1994*20/67 (29.9)19/94 (20.2)JCB11710
Watanabe et al.,18 200018/51 (35.3)13/50 (26.0)NS10
Browne et al.,14 200317/57 (29.8)3/53 (5.7)HM5710
Tzankov et al.,16 200384/253 (33.2)26/253 (10.3)NS10**
García-Cosío et al.,15 200455/305 (18.0)46/258 (17.8)JCB117NS
Valsami et al.,23 2007NS6/104 (5.8)JCB11710
Hoeller et al.,17 201076/269 (28.3)24/244 (9.8)JCB11710
Di Napoli et al.,24 201313/51 (25.5)17/51 (33.3)NS>0
Elsayed et al.,25 201745/173 (26.0)9/25 (36.0)NS10

* “Lymphocyte predominance” was excluded from CHL cases.

** In case the tissue microarray core contains ≥10 HRS cells.

CHL: classic Hodgkin lymphoma; HRS cell: Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cell; NS, not stated.

* “Lymphocyte predominance” was excluded from CHL cases. ** In case the tissue microarray core contains ≥10 HRS cells. CHL: classic Hodgkin lymphoma; HRS cell: Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cell; NS, not stated. CD20 and CD79a are the most widely-used B-cell markers. Immunohistochemical findings of CD20 in CHL have been more frequently described than those of CD79a. Proportions of CD20-positive cases reportedly range from 4.9% to 35.3% (Table 3).-,,- In previous reports, the CD20-positive proportions were slightly higher than the CD79a-positive proportions. Our study also revealed more patients to be positive for CD20 (25 patients) than for CD79a (20 patients), consistent with the previous studies. In addition, older patients were reported to have a higher proportion of CD20-positivity than younger patients.,- As our study found no significant correlation between CD79a and CD20 expression, they may be independent B-cell markers in CHL. Indeed, CD20- and CD79a-positivity were reported to be only weakly correlated. Associations between CD79a and B-cell-specific transcription factors were also analyzed in previous reports, one of which found a significant positive association between OCT-2 and CD79a, but not between BOB.1 and CD79a. There is limited evidence for the correlation between the expression of CD79a and clinical and laboratory disease characteristics in CHL. A previous report found CD79a not to be associated with the clinical disease characteristics of CHL, including prognosis. However, in our study, CD79a-positive CHL had a poorer prognosis than CD79a-negative CHL. Two of five patients with > 80% CD79a-positive CHL cells died of the disease even though they were in a limited CS at onset. This suggests that CD79a-positivity in CHL reflects the aggressiveness of the disease. In contrast to CD79a, the prognostic impact of CD20 has been well documented, although controversies remain.,, CHL cases sometimes require differential diagnosis from aggressive B-cell lymphomas, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), especially when the tumor consists of relatively high numbers of neoplastic cells with B-cell marker expression. As CD20 and CD79a expression has no notable correlation, CD79a should not be considered as a representative B-cell marker to discriminate CHL from DLBCL. When the expression of B-cell markers does not differ, differential diagnosis between CHL and DLBCL may be difficult. In such situations, confirmation of weaker PAX5 staining or downregulation of BOB.1 and/or OCT-2 can be useful. The unfavorable clinical outcome of patients with CD79a-positive CHL may represent the aggressive characteristics in common with DLBCL. Although patients with DLBCL are often classified in a higher CS than those with CHL,- the patients with CD79a-positive CHL in our study presented in both limited and advanced CS. CHL highly expressing B-cell markers like CD20 and CD79a is controversial regarding its distinction from gray zone lymphoma (GZL) or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL).,- However, mediastinal GZL or PMLBCL, whose differential diagnosis from CHL has been discussed in many studies, usually develops in younger adults. Therefore, the 5 CHL cases with CD79a-positivity higher than 80% had fundamentally different age distributions and initial tumor localization from mediastinal GZL or PMLBCL. Non-mediastinal GZL should also be taken into consideration when diagnosing CHL with high expression of B-cell markers; however, it is difficult to discuss due to its poorly established diagnostic criteria. In conclusion, we found CD79a-positivity in CHL to be associated with older age. In addition, CD79a-positive CHL patients had a poorer survival rate than CD79a-negative CHL patients. No positive correlation was observed between CD79a and CD20 expression. Our study suggests that CD79a-positive CHL involves unique clinicopathological features compared with CD79a-negative CHL. Further studies are needed to clarify the characteristics of CD79a-positive CHL, especially in Japan, where many patients are older at onset.
  35 in total

1.  Phase II study of ABVd therapy for newly diagnosed clinical stage II-IV Hodgkin lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG 9305).

Authors:  Michinori Ogura; Kuniaki Itoh; Tomohiro Kinoshita; Haruhiko Fukuda; Takeaki Takenaka; Tomoko Ohtsu; Yoshitoyo Kagami; Kensei Tobinai; Masataka Okamoto; Hideki Asaoku; Tsuneo Sasaki; Chikara Mikuni; Masami Hirano; Takaaki Chou; Kazunori Ohnishi; Hitoshi Ohno; Kaori Nasu; Kenichi Okabe; Shuichi Ikeda; Shigeo Nakamura; Tomomitsu Hotta; Masanori Shimoyama
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Classical Hodgkin's disease. Clinical impact of the immunophenotype.

Authors:  R von Wasielewski; M Mengel; R Fischer; M L Hansmann; K Hübner; J Franklin; H Tesch; U Paulus; M Werner; V Diehl; A Georgii
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Gray zone lymphoma with features intermediate between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: characteristics, outcomes, and prognostication among a large multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Andrew M Evens; Jennifer A Kanakry; Laurie H Sehn; Athena Kritharis; Tatyana Feldman; Aimee Kroll; Randy D Gascoyne; Jeremy S Abramson; Adam M Petrich; Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Zeina Al-Mansour; Camille Adeimy; Jessica Hemminger; Nancy L Bartlett; Anthony Mato; Paolo F Caimi; Ranjana H Advani; Andreas K Klein; Chadi Nabhan; Sonali M Smith; Jesus C Fabregas; Izidore S Lossos; Oliver W Press; Timothy S Fenske; Jonathan W Friedberg; Julie M Vose; Kristie A Blum
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Expression status of BCL-6 and syndecan-1 identifies distinct histogenetic subtypes of Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  A Carbone; A Gloghini; G Gaidano; S Franceschi; D Capello; H G Drexler; B Falini; R Dalla-Favera
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Prognostic significance of CD20 expression and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) association in classical Hodgkin lymphoma in Japan: a clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  Ahmed Ali Elsayed; Naoko Asano; Koichi Ohshima; Koji Izutsu; Tomohiro Kinoshita; Shigeo Nakamura
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.534

6.  Randomized comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV hybrid for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease: report of an intergroup trial.

Authors:  David B Duggan; Gina R Petroni; Jeffrey L Johnson; John H Glick; Richard I Fisher; Joseph M Connors; George P Canellos; Bruce A Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  ABVD plus subtotal nodal versus involved-field radiotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin's disease: long-term results.

Authors:  Gianni Bonadonna; Valeria Bonfante; Simonetta Viviani; Anna Di Russo; Fabrizio Villani; Pinuccia Valagussa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The B-cell transcription factors BSAP, Oct-2, and BOB.1 and the pan-B-cell markers CD20, CD22, and CD79a are useful in the differential diagnosis of classic Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Patrick Browne; Karen Petrosyan; Antonio Hernandez; Joel A Chan
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  The expression of the B-cell marker mb-1 (CD79a) in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  P Korkolopoulou; J Cordell; M Jones; L Kaklamanis; A Tsenga; K C Gatter; D Y Mason
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  CD20 Over-Expression in Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg Cells of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: the Neglected Quest.

Authors:  Daniel Benharroch; Karen Nalbandyan; Irina Lazarev
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  3 in total

1.  Establishment and validation of an individualized macrophage-related gene signature to predict overall survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Peng Su; Ziqi Peng; Boyang Xu; Bowen Yang; Feng Jin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  CD20 expression is closely associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection and an inferior survival in nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Xia Zhao; Yushuo Ma; Haiyan Bian; Zhihe Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Histological Subtypes Drive Distinct Prognostic Immune Signatures in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Claire Lamaison; Juliette Ferrant; Pauline Gravelle; Alexandra Traverse-Glehen; Hervé Ghesquières; Marie Tosolini; Cédric Rossi; Loic Ysebaert; Pierre Brousset; Camille Laurent; Charlotte Syrykh
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.