Irit R Rasooly1,2, Justine Shults3,2, James P Guevara3,2, Chris Feudtner3,2. 1. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and rasoolyi@email.chop.edu. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home nursing is essential for children with medical complexity (CMC), but provision varies substantially across states. Our objectives were to quantify state-to-state variability in distribution of posthospitalization home nursing to commercially insured CMC and to rank-order states. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of hospitalized commercially insured children with ≥1 complex chronic condition from birth to 18 years of age in the Truven MarketScan database. Cohort eligibility criteria were hospital discharge between January 2013 and November 2016 and at least 30 days of follow-up after discharge. Two primary outcome measures were used: receipt of any home nursing within 30 days of hospital discharge (yes or no) and number of days of posthospitalization home nursing (1-30 days). A composite metric encompassing both receipt and quantity was created by evaluating the 95th percentile of days of home nursing (0-30 days). RESULTS: Overall, 9.9% of the sample received home nursing. After we adjusted for patient characteristics, the probability of receiving home nursing varied across states, ranging from 3.4% to 19.2%. Among home nursing recipients, the adjusted median home nursing days across states ranged from 6.6 to 24.5 days. The adjusted 95th percentile of days of home nursing (across the entire of sample, including recipients and nonrecipients of home nursing) ranged from 6.8 to 22.6 days. CONCLUSIONS: We observed striking state-to-state variability in receipt of home nursing and mean number of days of posthospitalization home nursing among commercially insured CMC after adjustment for demographic and clinical differences. This suggests opportunities for state-level improvement.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home nursing is essential for children with medical complexity (CMC), but provision varies substantially across states. Our objectives were to quantify state-to-state variability in distribution of posthospitalization home nursing to commercially insured CMC and to rank-order states. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of hospitalized commercially insured children with ≥1 complex chronic condition from birth to 18 years of age in the Truven MarketScan database. Cohort eligibility criteria were hospital discharge between January 2013 and November 2016 and at least 30 days of follow-up after discharge. Two primary outcome measures were used: receipt of any home nursing within 30 days of hospital discharge (yes or no) and number of days of posthospitalization home nursing (1-30 days). A composite metric encompassing both receipt and quantity was created by evaluating the 95th percentile of days of home nursing (0-30 days). RESULTS: Overall, 9.9% of the sample received home nursing. After we adjusted for patient characteristics, the probability of receiving home nursing varied across states, ranging from 3.4% to 19.2%. Among home nursing recipients, the adjusted median home nursing days across states ranged from 6.6 to 24.5 days. The adjusted 95th percentile of days of home nursing (across the entire of sample, including recipients and nonrecipients of home nursing) ranged from 6.8 to 22.6 days. CONCLUSIONS: We observed striking state-to-state variability in receipt of home nursing and mean number of days of posthospitalization home nursing among commercially insured CMC after adjustment for demographic and clinical differences. This suggests opportunities for state-level improvement.
Authors: Jay G Berry; Matt Hall; Helene Dumas; Edwin Simpser; Kathleen Whitford; Karen M Wilson; Margaret O'Neill; Vineeta Mittal; Rishi Agrawal; Michael Dribbon; Christopher J Haines; Christine Traul; Michelle Marks; Jane O'Brien Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Yun Wang; Erica C Leifheit-Limson; Jonathan Fine; Michelle M Pandolfi; Yan Gao; Fanglin Liu; Sheila Eckenrode; Judith H Lichtman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jay G Berry; Matt Hall; John Neff; Denise Goodman; Eyal Cohen; Rishi Agrawal; Dennis Kuo; Chris Feudtner Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: James C Gay; Cary W Thurm; Matthew Hall; Michael J Fassino; Lisa Fowler; John V Palusci; Jay G Berry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sushmita Yallapragada; Rashmin C Savani; Sara Mūnoz-Blanco; Joanne M Lagatta; William E Truog; Nicolas F M Porta; Leif D Nelin; Huayan Zhang; Shilpa Vyas-Read; Robert DiGeronimo; Girija Natarajan; Erica Wymore; Beth Haberman; Joana Machry; Karin Potoka; Karna Murthy Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 2.521