Literature DB >> 32641229

Upper Extremity Function, Peer Relationships, and Pain Interference: Evaluating the Biopsychosocial Model in a Pediatric Hand Surgery Population Using PROMIS.

Nikolas H Kazmers1, Angela P Presson2, Ziji Yu3, Wyatt Walsh4, Douglas T Hutchinson4, Andrew R Tyser4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between biopsychosocial factors and patient-reported function is less clear in pediatric than in adult hand surgery patients. Our primary hypothesis was that pain interference (PI) and peer relationships (PR) would demonstrate association with upper extremity function. Secondarily, we hypothesized that the magnitude of this effect would increase with age.
METHODS: Patients aged 5 to 17 years presenting to a tertiary academic clinic between October 2017 and January 2019 were included. The parent/guardian was administered the following instruments after indicating they, rather than the patient, were answering the questions on a tablet computer: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Parent Proxy (PP) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) v2.0, PROMIS PI PP CAT v2.0, and the PROMIS PR PP CAT v2.0. Ceiling/floor effects and Spearman correlations were calculated. Multivariable Tobit modeling was performed to determine whether biopsychosocial factors and upper extremity function were associated. Multivariable regression coefficients were compared between age cohorts using a separate multivariable model to evaluate the interaction between age and other predictors.
RESULTS: Of 139 included participants, the mean age was 11.7 ± 3.7 years and 50% were female. For patients 11 years of age or younger, UE was weakly correlated with PI (coefficient, -0.34; 95% confidence interval, -0.56 to -0.08) and was not correlated with PR. For patients older than 11 years, UE had moderate correlation with PI (coefficient, -0.60; 95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.45) and was not correlated with PR. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant negative association between PI and UE, with a significantly larger magnitude of effect for patients older than 11 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: The biopsychosocial model applies to pediatric hand surgery patients. The association between greater pain interference and worse patient-reported upper extremity function, as assessed using parent proxy instruments, was significantly stronger for patients older than 11 years than those 11 years old or younger. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that the biopsychosocial model applies to pediatric hand patients.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsychosocial model; PROMIS; congenital; hand surgery; pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32641229      PMCID: PMC7483303          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  27 in total

1.  Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.

Authors:  M M Mukaka
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.875

2.  To What Degree Do Pain-coping Strategies Affect Joint Stiffness and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Hand Fractures?

Authors:  Young Hak Roh; Jung Ho Noh; Joo Han Oh; Hyun Sik Gong; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evaluation of Version 2.0 of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients.

Authors:  Andrew R Tyser; Man Hung; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren W Voss; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Self-reported upper extremity health status correlates with depression.

Authors:  David Ring; John Kadzielski; Lauren Fabian; David Zurakowski; Leah R Malhotra; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method.

Authors:  David Thissen; Yang Liu; Brooke Magnus; Hally Quinn; Debbie S Gipson; Carlton Dampier; I-Chan Huang; Pamela S Hinds; David T Selewski; Bryce B Reeve; Heather E Gross; Darren A DeWalt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Contribution of kinesophobia and catastrophic thinking to upper-extremity-specific disability.

Authors:  Soumen Das De; Ana-Maria Vranceanu; David C Ring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Association of Physical Function, Anxiety, and Pain Interference in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients Using the PROMIS Platform.

Authors:  Nikolas H Kazmers; Man Hung; Ajinkya A Rane; Jerry Bounsanga; Cindy Weng; Andrew R Tyser
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Performance of Pediatric PROMIS CATs in Children With Upper Extremity Fractures.

Authors:  William D Gerull; Ugochi C Okoroafor; Jason Guattery; Charles A Goldfarb; Lindley B Wall; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  Functional Impact of Congenital Hand Differences: Early Results From the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry.

Authors:  Donald S Bae; Maria F Canizares; Patricia E Miller; Peter M Waters; Charles A Goldfarb
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the PROMIS and QuickDASH Instruments in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Population.

Authors:  Nikolas H Kazmers; Yuqing Qiu; Minkyoung Yoo; Andrew R Stephens; Andrew R Tyser; Yue Zhang
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.