| Literature DB >> 32641133 |
Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas-Jesus1, Larissa Rodrigues1, Fernanda Garanhani Surita2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is highly infectious, with the recent World Health Organization decree confirming a global public health emergency. The outcomes related to maternal and fetal health among pregnant women infected with the virus are still poorly understood. The world population has been waiting for answers and remains constantly alert about the pandemic's progress. It is not yet known what impact this pandemic experience will have on the population's mental health, especially pregnant women.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Community relations; Coronavirus; Family relations; Feelings; Pandemic; Pregnant women; Psychology; Social media; qualitative study
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32641133 PMCID: PMC7341704 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-00958-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Fig. 1The theoretical model of the aims to be explored in the research
The interview script
| Open-ended and in-deep questions for the interviews | |
|---|---|
| How did you feel when you were diagnosed with COVID-19? | |
| Tell me about your experience with this disease before and after the infection | |
| How do you feel about your own health? What about the baby’s health? | |
| Tell me about your experience with your partner and / or your closest family about COVID. | |
| How has it been with other people close to you, such as friends, neighbors, co-workers? | |
| How did you feel about the care you received from the health team? What is your perception of the recovery period and treatment of the disease? | |
| How do you understand the quarantine or the social isolation? How was it for you? | |
| Do you think that the media influenced your feelings about COVID? For example, whatsapp messages and groups, newscasts, instagram, facebook, twitter. |
The Thematic Analysis
| Phases of the Thematic Analysis | Description | Means of stablishing trustworthiness |
|---|---|---|
| Phase in which the researchers are familiarized with the depth and breadth of the available data (interviews transcripts and field diary). The process of creating initial ideas about the data begins. | - Prolonged involvement with the data | |
| - Triangulation of different types of qualitative data | ||
| - Documentation of reflective and theoretical thoughts | ||
| - Documentation of potential codes and themes | ||
| - Storage of raw data in organized files | ||
| - Keep records of field diaries, transcripts, and scientific articles | ||
| Production of initial codes, a theorizing activity that requires researchers to revisit the data constantly. The codes will index important sections of the text, using software such as NVivo. | - Peer debriefing | |
| - Reflective diary on data analysis | ||
| - Structuring the coding process | ||
| - Review of produced codes | ||
| - Documentation of all meetings with researchers | ||
| Production of themes that will unite the codes, bringing meaning and identity to the data according to the research question. | - Discussion or triangulation with researchers | |
| - Layout to give meaning to the text (use of maps, flowcharts, etc.) | ||
| - Keep detailed notes on the development of hierarchical themes and concepts | ||
| Refining the themes to check if there is a coherent standardization, according to the entire data. It is possible to return to the raw data and produce new codes that were not covered in the previous phases. | - Discussion or triangulation with researchers | |
| - Approval of themes and sub-themes by team researchers | ||
| - Referential suitability test through the return to raw data | ||
| The researchers determine which aspect of the data each theme captures and identify what is interesting about it and why. | - Discussion or triangulation with researchers | |
| - Team consensus on topics | ||
| - Documentation of team meetings on the topics | ||
| - Documentation of the theme naming process | ||
| When the themes are already defined, it is possible to complete the final analysis. Provide a concise, coherent, logical, non-repetitive, and interesting description of the data within and between themes | - Discussion with researchers | |
| - Describe the coding and analysis process in sufficient detail | ||
| - Detailed context descriptions | ||
| - Description of the audit process | ||
| - Report on the reasons for the theoretical, methodological and analytical choices throughout the study |