Literature DB >> 32640425

Modeling the printability of photocuring and strength adjustable hydrogel bioink during projection-based 3D bioprinting.

Yuan Sun1,2, Kang Yu1, Jing Nie1, Miao Sun3,4, Jianzhong Fu1,2, Huiming Wang3,4, Yong He1,5.   

Abstract

As a projection based three-dimensional printing method, digital light processing bioprinting (DLPBP) has higher printing resolution and is suitable for constructing finer structures to mimic tissues when compared to extrusion based bioprinting. However, there is a lack of understanding about printing behavior during DLPBP. Herein, a photo crosslinking theory for ink was established and a specified amount of light absorber was added to control crosslinking depth. Then, a standardized methodology was established to quantitatively evaluate printing resolution using different parameters. Complex biostructures, such as the ear, hand, and heart, were precisely printed after understanding the mechanism. Additionally, the mechanical properties of printed samples were accurately adjusted by changing the hydrogel concentration, as well as the degree of substitution and photocrosslinking time. The tissue types printed were from ultra-soft tissues, such as liver (6-8 kPa) to soft tissue, such as the skin (0.3-0.4 MPa). A branching vessel with cells in a real tensile modulus was printed as a demonstration. After 1 week of culture, proliferation and function of human umbilical vein endothelial cells were characterized. Overall, we made it possible to print a mimic complex tissue with high precision, required physical properties and functionalized living cells.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GelMA; bioprinting; digital light projection; hydrogel

Year:  2021        PMID: 32640425     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aba413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

2.  Molecularly cleavable bioinks facilitate high-performance digital light processing-based bioprinting of functional volumetric soft tissues.

Authors:  Mian Wang; Wanlu Li; Jin Hao; Arthur Gonzales; Zhibo Zhao; Regina Sanchez Flores; Xiao Kuang; Xuan Mu; Terry Ching; Guosheng Tang; Zeyu Luo; Carlos Ezio Garciamendez-Mijares; Jugal Kishore Sahoo; Michael F Wells; Gengle Niu; Prajwal Agrawal; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Kevin Eggan; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  In situ 3D bioprinting with bioconcrete bioink.

Authors:  Mingjun Xie; Yang Shi; Chun Zhang; Mingjie Ge; Jingbo Zhang; Zichen Chen; Jianzhong Fu; Zhijian Xie; Yong He
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Improving Printability of Digital-Light-Processing 3D Bioprinting via Photoabsorber Pigment Adjustment.

Authors:  Jeong Wook Seo; Gyu Min Kim; Yejin Choi; Jae Min Cha; Hojae Bae
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  3D printing of tissue engineering scaffolds: a focus on vascular regeneration.

Authors:  Pengju Wang; Yazhou Sun; Xiaoquan Shi; Huixing Shen; Haohao Ning; Haitao Liu
Journal:  Biodes Manuf       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  Printability during projection-based 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Kang Yu; Xinjie Zhang; Yuan Sun; Qing Gao; Jianzhong Fu; Xiujun Cai; Yong He
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.