Anna S Warden1,2,3, Adriana DaCosta1, Sonia Mason1, Yuri A Blednov1, Roy Dayne Mayfield1,2, Robert Adron Harris1,2. 1. From the Waggoner Center for Alcoholism and Addiction Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. 2. Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. 3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The inbred mouse strain C57BL/6 is widely used in both models of addiction and immunological disease. However, there are pronounced phenotypic differences in ethanol (EtOH) consumption and innate immune response between C57BL/6 substrains. The focus of this study was to examine the effects of substrain on innate immune response and neuroimmune-induced escalation of voluntary EtOH consumption. The main goal was to identify whether substrain differences in immune response can account for differences in EtOH behavior. METHODS: We compared acute innate immune response with a viral dsRNA mimic, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), in brain using qRT-PCR in both C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice. Next, we used a neuroimmune model of escalation using poly(I:C) to compare drinking behavior between substrains. Finally, we compared brain neuroimmune response with both EtOH and repeated poly(I:C) in both substrains as a way to account for differences in EtOH behavior. RESULTS: We found that C57BL/6 substrains have differing immune response and drinking behaviors. C57BL/6N mice have a shorter but more robust inflammatory response to acute poly(I:C). In contrast, C57BL/6J mice have a smaller but longer-lasting acute immune response to poly(I:C). In our neuroimmune-induced escalation model, C57BL/6J mice but not C57BL/6N mice escalate EtOH intake after poly(I:C). Finally, only C57BL/6J mice show enhanced proinflammatory transcript abundance after poly(I:C) and EtOH, suggesting that longer-lasting immune responses are critical to neuroimmune drinking phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, this work has elucidated additional influences that substrain has on both innate immune response and drinking phenotypes. Our observations highlight the importance of considering and reporting the source and background used for production of transgenic and knockout mice. These data provide further evidence that genetic background must be carefully considered when investigating the role of neuroimmune signaling in EtOH abuse.
BACKGROUND: The inbred mouse strain C57BL/6 is widely used in both models of addiction and immunological disease. However, there are pronounced phenotypic differences in ethanol (EtOH) consumption and innate immune response between C57BL/6 substrains. The focus of this study was to examine the effects of substrain on innate immune response and neuroimmune-induced escalation of voluntary EtOH consumption. The main goal was to identify whether substrain differences in immune response can account for differences in EtOH behavior. METHODS: We compared acute innate immune response with a viral dsRNA mimic, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), in brain using qRT-PCR in both C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice. Next, we used a neuroimmune model of escalation using poly(I:C) to compare drinking behavior between substrains. Finally, we compared brain neuroimmune response with both EtOH and repeated poly(I:C) in both substrains as a way to account for differences in EtOH behavior. RESULTS: We found that C57BL/6 substrains have differing immune response and drinking behaviors. C57BL/6N mice have a shorter but more robust inflammatory response to acute poly(I:C). In contrast, C57BL/6J mice have a smaller but longer-lasting acute immune response to poly(I:C). In our neuroimmune-induced escalation model, C57BL/6J mice but not C57BL/6N mice escalate EtOH intake after poly(I:C). Finally, only C57BL/6J mice show enhanced proinflammatory transcript abundance after poly(I:C) and EtOH, suggesting that longer-lasting immune responses are critical to neuroimmune drinking phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, this work has elucidated additional influences that substrain has on both innate immune response and drinking phenotypes. Our observations highlight the importance of considering and reporting the source and background used for production of transgenic and knockout mice. These data provide further evidence that genetic background must be carefully considered when investigating the role of neuroimmune signaling in EtOH abuse.
Authors: Maia L Green; Amar V Singh; Yihzi Zhang; Kimberly A Nemeth; Kathleen K Sulik; Thomas B Knudsen Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: Anna S Warden; Moatasem Azzam; Adriana DaCosta; Sonia Mason; Yuri A Blednov; Robert O Messing; R Dayne Mayfield; R Adron Harris Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Anna S Warden; Moatasem Azzam; Adriana DaCosta; Sonia Mason; Yuri A Blednov; Robert O Messing; R Dayne Mayfield; R Adron Harris Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: I Jéru; P Duquesnoy; T Fernandes-Alnemri; E Cochet; J W Yu; M Lackmy-Port-Lis; E Grimprel; J Landman-Parker; V Hentgen; S Marlin; K McElreavey; T Sarkisian; G Grateau; E S Alnemri; S Amselem Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-01-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Janelle C Arthur; John D Lich; Zhengmao Ye; Irving C Allen; Denis Gris; Justin E Wilson; Monika Schneider; Kelly E Roney; Brian P O'Connor; Chris B Moore; Amy Morrison; Fayyaz S Sutterwala; John Bertin; Beverly H Koller; Zhi Liu; Jenny P-Y Ting Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Tyler K Ulland; Nidhi Jain; Emma E Hornick; Eric I Elliott; Gwendolyn M Clay; Jeffrey J Sadler; Kathleen A M Mills; Ann M Janowski; A Paige Davis Volk; Kai Wang; Kevin L Legge; Lokesh Gakhar; Mohammed Bourdi; Polly J Ferguson; Mary E Wilson; Suzanne L Cassel; Fayyaz S Sutterwala Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Alexander R French; Anna M Gutridge; Jinling Yuan; Q Hawk Royer; Richard M van Rijn Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: C Leonardo Jimenez Chavez; Camron D Bryant; Melissa A Munn-Chernoff; Karen K Szumlinski Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 5.923