Eric D Brooks1,2, Matthew S Ning1, Matthew B Palmer3, G Brandon Gunn1,4, Steven J Frank1,4, Aashish K Shah5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 2. University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL. 3. Legion Healthcare Partners, Houston, TX. 4. Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. HCA Healthcare Sarah Cannon, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prior authorization (PA) can be a resource-intensive barrier to oncologic care. To improve patient access and reduce delays at our large, academic proton therapy center, we implemented a novel payor-focused strategy to efficiently navigate the PA process while eliminating physician burden and reducing inappropriate denials. METHODS: In 2017, business operations were redesigned to better reflect the insurance process: (1) certified medical dosimetrists (CMDs), with their unique treatment expertise, replaced our historical PA team to function as an effective interface among physicians, patients, and payors; (2) a structured, tiered timeline was implemented to hold payors accountable to PA deadlines; and (3) our PA team provided administrative leadership with requisite insurance knowledge. PA outcomes were compared 6 months before and after the intervention. RESULTS: After implementation of this multifaceted strategy, the median time to successful appeal (after initial denial of coverage) decreased from 30 to 18 days (P < .001), and the total number of overturned denials increased by 56%. Because of the efficiency of the CMDs, full-time equivalents on the PA team actually decreased by 44%, translating to a 34% reduction in team personnel expenses. Internal referrals increased by 29%, attributable to optimized communication and diminished administrative burden for providers. New treatment starts also increased, resulting in a 37% larger patient census on treatment. CONCLUSION: Incorporating payor-focused strategies can improve patient access in a cost-effective manner while decreasing time and administrative burden associated with the PA process. These operational concepts can be adapted for other oncologic practice settings facing analogous PA-related obstacles.
PURPOSE: Prior authorization (PA) can be a resource-intensive barrier to oncologic care. To improve patient access and reduce delays at our large, academic proton therapy center, we implemented a novel payor-focused strategy to efficiently navigate the PA process while eliminating physician burden and reducing inappropriate denials. METHODS: In 2017, business operations were redesigned to better reflect the insurance process: (1) certified medical dosimetrists (CMDs), with their unique treatment expertise, replaced our historical PA team to function as an effective interface among physicians, patients, and payors; (2) a structured, tiered timeline was implemented to hold payors accountable to PA deadlines; and (3) our PA team provided administrative leadership with requisite insurance knowledge. PA outcomes were compared 6 months before and after the intervention. RESULTS: After implementation of this multifaceted strategy, the median time to successful appeal (after initial denial of coverage) decreased from 30 to 18 days (P < .001), and the total number of overturned denials increased by 56%. Because of the efficiency of the CMDs, full-time equivalents on the PA team actually decreased by 44%, translating to a 34% reduction in team personnel expenses. Internal referrals increased by 29%, attributable to optimized communication and diminished administrative burden for providers. New treatment starts also increased, resulting in a 37% larger patient census on treatment. CONCLUSION: Incorporating payor-focused strategies can improve patient access in a cost-effective manner while decreasing time and administrative burden associated with the PA process. These operational concepts can be adapted for other oncologic practice settings facing analogous PA-related obstacles.
Authors: Julie Ann Sakowski; James G Kahn; Richard G Kronick; Jeffrey M Newman; Harold S Luft Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Dante Morra; Sean Nicholson; Wendy Levinson; David N Gans; Terry Hammons; Lawrence P Casalino Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Matthew S Ning; Daniel R Gomez; Aashish K Shah; Charissa R Kim; Matthew B Palmer; Nikhil G Thaker; David R Grosshans; Zhongxing Liao; Bhavana V Chapman; Eric D Brooks; Chad Tang; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; Steven J Frank; G Brandon Gunn Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bradford S Hoppe; Randal Henderson; Dat Pham; James D Cury; Abubakr Bajwa; Christopher G Morris; Harry D'Agostino; Stella Flampouri; Soon Huh; Zuofeng Li; Barry McCook; Romaine C Nichols Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nikhil G Thaker; Ankit Agarwal; Matthew Palmer; Rosemarie Hontiveros; Stephen M Hahn; Bruce D Minsky; Ronald Walters; John Bingham; Thomas W Feeley; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Frank Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2016-03-24
Authors: William M Mendenhall; Eric D Brooks; Stephanie Smith; Christopher G Morris; Curtis B Bryant; Randal H Henderson; Romaine C Nichols; Kathy McIntyre; Stuart L Klein; Nancy P Mendenhall Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2021-07-27
Authors: Danmeng Huang; Steven J Frank; Vivek Verma; Nikhil G Thaker; Eric D Brooks; Matthew B Palmer; Ross F Harrison; Ashish A Deshmukh; Matthew S Ning Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2021-06-25