Literature DB >> 32638043

Direct Comparison of Fecal and Gut Microbiota in the Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis) Discourages Fecal Sampling as a Proxy for Resident Gut Community.

Tyler W Griffin1, Julia G Baer2, J Evan Ward3.   

Abstract

Bivalves have ecological and economic importance but information regarding their associated microbiomes is lacking. As suspension feeders, bivalves capture and ingest a myriad of particles, and their digestive organs have a high throughput of particle-associated microbiota. To better understand the complement of transient and resident microbial communities, standard methods need to be developed. For example, fecal sampling could represent a convenient proxy for the gut microbiome and is simple, nondestructive, and allows for sampling of individuals through time. The goal of this study was to evaluate fecal sampling as a reliable proxy for gut microbiome assessment in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Mussels were collected from the natural environment and placed into individual sterilized microcosms for 6 h to allow for fecal egestion. Feces and gut homogenates from the same individuals were sampled and subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Fecal communities of different mussels resembled each other but did not resemble gut communities. Fecal communities were significantly more diverse, in terms of amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness and evenness, than gut communities. Results suggested a mostly transient nature for fecal microbiota. Nonetheless, mussels retained a distinct resident microbial community in their gut after fecal egestion that was dominated by ASVs belonging to Mycoplasma. The use of fecal sampling as a nondestructive substitute for direct sampling of the gut is strongly discouraged. Experiments that aim to study solely resident bivalve gut microbiota should employ an egestion period prior to gut sampling to allow time for voidance of transient microbes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gut microbiome; Mussel; Resident; Transient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32638043     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01553-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  33 in total

1.  Assessing gut microbial diversity from feces and rectal mucosa.

Authors:  Ana Durbán; Juan J Abellán; Nuria Jiménez-Hernández; Marta Ponce; Julio Ponce; Teresa Sala; Giuseppe D'Auria; Amparo Latorre; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Therapeutic potential of fecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Loek P Smits; Kristien E C Bouter; Willem M de Vos; Thomas J Borody; Max Nieuwdorp
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Comparative 16SrDNA Gene-Based Microbiota Profiles of the Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and the Mediterranean Mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from a Shellfish Farm (Ligurian Sea, Italy).

Authors:  Luigi Vezzulli; L Stagnaro; C Grande; G Tassistro; L Canesi; C Pruzzo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  [The physician--the partner of private health insurance].

Authors:  H Frommknecht
Journal:  Versicherungsmedizin       Date:  1988-03-01

5.  The impact of depuration on mussel hepatopancreas bacteriome composition and predicted metagenome.

Authors:  J A Rubiolo; A Lozano-Leon; R Rodriguez-Souto; N Fol Rodríguez; M R Vieytes; L M Botana
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters.

Authors:  Kjersti Aagaard; Joseph Petrosino; Wendy Keitel; Mark Watson; James Katancik; Nathalia Garcia; Shital Patel; Mary Cutting; Tessa Madden; Holli Hamilton; Emily Harris; Dirk Gevers; Gina Simone; Pamela McInnes; James Versalovic
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Elevated Seawater Temperatures Decrease Microbial Diversity in the Gut of Mytilus coruscus.

Authors:  Yi-Feng Li; Na Yang; Xiao Liang; Asami Yoshida; Kiyoshi Osatomi; Deborah Power; Frederico M Batista; Jin-Long Yang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  High turnover of faecal microbiome from algal feedstock experimental manipulations in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas).

Authors:  Ariel Levi Simons; Nathan Churches; Sergey Nuzhdin
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Gut Microbiomes of the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and the Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis): Temporal Variation and the Influence of Marine Aggregate-Associated Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Melissa L Pierce; J Evan Ward
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.389

View more
  1 in total

1.  Microbiome Analysis Reveals Diversity and Function of Mollicutes Associated with the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica.

Authors:  Zachary T Pimentel; Keith Dufault-Thompson; Kayla T Russo; Abigail K Scro; Roxanna M Smolowitz; Marta Gomez-Chiarri; Ying Zhang
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.389

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.