Literature DB >> 32637924

The Validity and Sensitivity of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale on a Different Ethnic Group From Indian Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Harpreet Singh1, Sameer Arora1, Vikram Tanwar2, Ankit Kalra1, Gagandeep Sukhija1, Nikhil Govil3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by using Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS) and to find its correlation with Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 100 RA patients (23 males, 77 females; mean age 43.22 years; range, 19 to 72 years) who were subjected to RAPS questionnaire for pain assessment and DAS28 and CDAI for disease activity assessment. Spearman's correlation coefficient was measured to assess the correlation of RAPS with DAS28 and CDAI. Cronbach's alpha (α) was also measured for each scale to assess reliability.
RESULTS: The study group had a female to male ratio of 3.34:1. Mean values for RAPS, DAS28 and CDAI were 62.91, 5.59, and 25.24, respectively. RAPS was correlated with DAS28 and CDAI with correlation coefficients of 0.811 and 0.770, respectively. Cronbach's α for RAPS, DAS28 and CDAI were 0.892, 0.814, and 0.833, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale had a strong positive correlation with disease activity measures of DAS28 and CDAI. RAPS also showed good correlation with core data set measures hence merits its place in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2020, Turkish League Against Rheumatism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Disease Activity Index; Cronbach’s alpha; Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale; Spearman’s correlation coefficient; disease activity score 28

Year:  2019        PMID: 32637924      PMCID: PMC7322297          DOI: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2020.7348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Rheumatol        ISSN: 2148-5046            Impact factor:   1.472


  8 in total

1.  Quantitative clinical assessment in busy rheumatology settings: the value of short patient questionnaires.

Authors:  Theodore Pincus; Tuulikki Sokka
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

3.  Development of an instrument to measure pain in rheumatoid arthritis: Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS).

Authors:  D L Anderson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-08

4.  The DAS28 in rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  B F Leeb; I Andel; J Sautner; T Nothnagl; B Rintelen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  Psychological aspects of pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a review.

Authors:  S M Skevington
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Pain behavior of rheumatoid arthritis patients enrolled in experimental drug trials.

Authors:  K O Anderson; L A Bradley; R A Turner; C A Agudelo; E J Pisko
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1994-06

7.  Validation and relevance of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS) in Indian (Asian) patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Toktam Kianifard; Taghi Kianyfard; Arvind Chopra
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Coping with arthritis pain. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S P Buckelew; J C Parker
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1989-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.