| Literature DB >> 32637659 |
Takayuki Tanaka-Gonome1, Yuting Xie1, Kodai Yamauchi1, Natsuki Maeda-Monai1, Reiko Tanabu1, Takashi Kudo1, Mitsuru Nakazawa1.
Abstract
Astaxanthin (AST), a natural marine carotenoid, possess a wide variety of biological functions. In particular, as a strong antioxidant, AST effectively scavenges oxygen free radicals and reduces oxidative stress. In addition, recent in vitro studies have suggested that AST attenuates glutamate-induced apoptosis and cytotoxicity. The glutamate/aspartate transporter (GLAST) deficient (GLAST-/-) mouse is a mouse model of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) caused by both the glutamate neurotoxicity and oxidative stress in the retina. In the present study, we investigated the effects of AST on the ganglion cell complex, indicator of glaucomatous structural damage, using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography. As a result, AST significantly attenuated the thinning of ganglion cell complex in GLAST-/- mice in comparison to an AST-free control group. Our results suggest the possibility that AST has protective effects against glutamate neurotoxicity and oxidative stress in the retina. At present, the only treatment for NTG that is available in the clinical setting is to reduce the IOP as much as possible. Thus, our results suggest that AST supplementation may be effective for some types of NTG in which glutamate neurotoxicity and oxidative stress are involved.Entities:
Keywords: Astaxanthin; GLAST; GLAST deficient Mice; Ganglion cell complex; Glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32637659 PMCID: PMC7330488 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Fig. 1Methods of SD-OCT examination by Micron® IV, and the relationship between the SD-OCT (P106) image findings and the histological findings in hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections (P120) of the C57BL/6J mouse retina.
Fig. 2A (the uppermost panel). Representative SD-OCT images of C57BL/6J mice (a, b, c, and d), control fed GLAST-/- mice (e, f, g, and h), and GLAST-/- mice + AST (i, j, k, and l). Panels a, b, c, and d correspond to C57BL/6J mice at P36, P72, P106, and P148, respectively. Panels e, f, g, and h correspond to control fed GLAST-/- mice at P44, P80, P114, and P156, respectively. Panels i, j, k, and l correspond to GLAST-/- mice + AST at P50, P78, P106, and P150, respectively.
B (the second upper panel). Comparison of the GCC thickness at the final observation point observed by SD-OCT in C57BL/6J
mice (a), control fed GLAST-/- mice (b), and GLAST-/- mice + AST (c).
C (the third upper panel). The longitudinal changes in the thickness of the GCC. Diamonds, C57BL/6J
mice; closed circles, control fed GLAST-/- mice; open circles, GLAST-/- mice + AST. Animal numbers: C57BL6J mice, P36~P148 (n = 4); control fed GLAST-/-, P44~P114 (n = 4), p156 (n = 5); GLAST-/- mice + AST, P50 (n = 6), P78~P106 (n = 5), P150 (n = 4). Statistical significance: ***, P < 0.001 (Student's t-test). Bars indicate standard error
D (the bottom panel). Comparison of the change in the GCC thickness from the baseline to each observation points. Diamonds, C57BL/6J
mice; closed circles, control fed GLAST-/- mice; open circles, GLAST-/- mice + AST. Animal numbers: C57BL6J mice, P36~P148 (n = 4); control fed GLAST-/-, P44~P114 (n = 4), p156 (n = 5); GLAST-/- mice + AST, P50 (n = 6), P78~P106 (n = 5), P150 (n = 4). Statistical significance: *, P < 0.05 (Student's t-test). Bars indicate standard error.
The thickness (μm) of the GCC in C57BL/6J mice, control fed GLAST-/- mice, and GLAST-/- mice + AST.
| point 1 (baseline) | point 2 | point 3 | point 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C57BL6J mice | 67.93 ± 1.35 | 64.74 ± 0.62 (95.30%) | 63.04 ± 1.48 (92.80%) | 65.15 ± 0.45 (95.91%) |
| Control fed GLAST-/- mice | 63.90 ± 1.31 | 58.90 ± 1.22 (92.18%) | 53.93 ± 1.18 (84.40%) | 50.69 ± 1.52 (79.33%) |
| GLAST-/- mice + AST | 59.74 ± 2.15 | 59.15 ± 2.42 (99.01%) | 59.51 ± 2.78 (99.61%) | 55.87 ± 2.79 (93.52%) |
Values indicate the mean ± standard error. The numbers in parentheses indicate the percentage in comparison to baseline.
Fig. 3Comparison of the retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer observed by electron microscopy in C57BL/6J mice, control fed GLAST-/- mice, and GLAST-/- mice + AST. Panel a corresponds to C57BL/6J mice at P147. Panel b corresponds to control fed GLAST-/- mice at P131. Panel c corresponds to GLAST-/- mice + AST at P127. Arrows indicate the RNFL thickness in each panel.