| Literature DB >> 32636334 |
Katie R Bradwell1, Drissa Coulibaly2, Abdoulaye K Koné2, Matthew B Laurens3, Ahmadou Dembélé2, Youssouf Tolo2, Karim Traoré2, Amadou Niangaly2, Andrea A Berry3, Bourema Kouriba2, Christopher V Plowe4, Ogobara K Doumbo2, Kirsten E Lyke3, Shannon Takala-Harrison3, Mahamadou A Thera2, Mark A Travassos5, David Serre6.
Abstract
Children are highly susceptible to clinical malaria, and in regions where malaria is endemic, their immune systems must face successive encounters with Plasmodium falciparum parasites before they develop immunity, first against severe disease and later against uncomplicated malaria. Understanding cellular and molecular interactions between host and parasites during an infection could provide insights into the processes underlying this gradual acquisition of immunity, as well as to how parasites adapt to infect hosts that are successively more malaria experienced. Here, we describe methods to analyze the host and parasite gene expression profiles generated simultaneously from blood samples collected from five consecutive symptomatic P. falciparum infections in three Malian children. We show that the data generated enable statistical assessment of the proportions of (i) each white blood cell subset and (ii) the parasite developmental stages, as well as investigations of host-parasite gene coexpression. We also use the sequences generated to analyze allelic variations in transcribed regions and determine the complexity of each infection. While limited by the modest sample size, our analyses suggest that host gene expression profiles primarily clustered by individual, while the parasite gene expression profiles seemed to differentiate early from late infections. Overall, this study provides a solid framework to examine the mechanisms underlying acquisition of immunity to malaria infections using whole-blood transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq).IMPORTANCE We show that dual RNA-seq from patient blood samples allows characterization of host/parasite interactions during malaria infections and can provide a solid framework to study the acquisition of antimalarial immunity, as well as the adaptations of P. falciparum to malaria-experienced hosts.Entities:
Keywords: malaria; transcriptomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32636334 PMCID: PMC7343306 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00116-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1Unsupervised clustering of the 15 samples according to the host (A) and parasite (B) gene expression profiles. The colors and numbers (1 to 3) indicate which patient the sample is derived from. The letters distinguish the five symptomatic infections from each patient, with A representing the earliest infection and E the latest. Tree height refers to dissimilarities in terms of squared Euclidean distance between cluster means.
Number of host and parasite genes differentially expressed according to the patient and the number of the infection
| Transcriptome | No. of genes | DE according | No. of DE genes at: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDR = 0.2 | FDR = 0.1 | |||
| Host | 8,896 | Patient | 4,581 | 2,876 |
| Infection no. | 1,042 | 97 | ||
| Parasite | 2,822 | Patient | 0 | 0 |
| Infection no. | 68 | 11 | ||
Only genes expressed at more than 10 counts per million in more than six samples were tested (see Materials and Methods).
FIG 2Volcano plot showing the results of the differential gene expression according to the number of successive infections for the host (A) and parasite (B) genes. Each dot represents one gene and is displayed according to the log fold change in expression (x axis) and the statistical significance of the association (y axis, in –log10 of the P value). Red dots indicate genes deemed to be differentially expressed (FDR = 0.2). Genes that increased in expression over the course of the five successive infections are shown by positive log fold change values, and those that decreased in expression are shown by negative log fold change values. Selected genes discussed in the text are labeled and, for the host, are color coded based on their functional annotation (immunoregulatory functions shown in black, platelet aggregation in turquoise, and G-protein signaling in purple).
FIG 3GSEA analysis of the human transcriptome by infection number (A) and patient 1 versus patient 2 (B). (A) The top 15 plots show the top 15 pathways upregulated over successive infection numbers, and the bottom 15 plots show the top 15 pathways downregulated over successive infection numbers. (B) The top 15 plots show the top 15 pathways upregulated in patient 2, and the bottom 15 plots show the top 15 pathways downregulated in patient 2.
FIG 4Gene expression deconvolution results. (A) Relative proportions of the different white blood cell subsets determined from the host transcriptomes. (B) Relative proportions of the different P. falciparum developmental stages determined from the parasite transcriptomes (hpi, hours postinfection).
FIG 5Complexity of infection analysis. The reference allele frequency distributions show, for each sample, the number of nucleotide positions (y axis) with a given proportion of reads carrying the reference allele (x axis). Note that while most infections show a clear U-shaped distribution consistent with the presence of a single (haploid) clone, infections 1A, 1C, 2C, and 3B display clear multimodal distributions consistent with the presence of multiple, genetically different parasites. The corresponding Fws values are indicated in each plot (with Fws < 0.95 indicative of polyclonal infections).