Laura M Padilla-Walker1, Adam A Rogers2, Ryan D McLean2. 1. School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. Electronic address: laura_walker@byu.edu. 2. School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Parents can be effective and consistent sex educators of their children, but research suggests that most parents only engage in a one-time talk about sex with their children. That being said, we know little about the potential variability in trajectories of parent-child sex communication over time. Thus, the present study took a person-centered approach to parent-child sex communication about sexual risk and explored predictors and outcomes of varying trajectories. METHODS: Participants included 468 adolescents and their parents who took part in a longitudinal study every year from ages 14-18 years (52% female, 67% white, and 33% single parents). RESULTS: Growth mixture modeling suggested four different trajectories of parent-child sex communication using child reports and two different trajectories using mother and father reports, with the majority of parents displaying low and stable levels of communication over time. Predictors and outcomes suggested that varying trajectories were in part a function of child behaviors (i.e., early sexual debut and externalizing behaviors), and mothers who reported trajectories of moderate-stable levels of communication had children who reported safer sex practices at age 21 years. CONCLUSIONS: The discussion focused on the benefits of longitudinal, person-centered approaches at identifying variability in parenting and the implications of findings for those concerned about the need for parental education on the importance of sex communication across adolescence.
PURPOSE: Parents can be effective and consistent sex educators of their children, but research suggests that most parents only engage in a one-time talk about sex with their children. That being said, we know little about the potential variability in trajectories of parent-child sex communication over time. Thus, the present study took a person-centered approach to parent-child sex communication about sexual risk and explored predictors and outcomes of varying trajectories. METHODS:Participants included 468 adolescents and their parents who took part in a longitudinal study every year from ages 14-18 years (52% female, 67% white, and 33% single parents). RESULTS: Growth mixture modeling suggested four different trajectories of parent-child sex communication using child reports and two different trajectories using mother and father reports, with the majority of parents displaying low and stable levels of communication over time. Predictors and outcomes suggested that varying trajectories were in part a function of child behaviors (i.e., early sexual debut and externalizing behaviors), and mothers who reported trajectories of moderate-stable levels of communication had children who reported safer sex practices at age 21 years. CONCLUSIONS: The discussion focused on the benefits of longitudinal, person-centered approaches at identifying variability in parenting and the implications of findings for those concerned about the need for parental education on the importance of sex communication across adolescence.
Authors: Jennifer M Grossman; Amanda M Richer; Belinda F Hernandez; Christine M Markham Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 3.390