Tian Ming Tu1,2, Guan Zhong Tan3, Seyed Ehsan Saffari4, Chee Keong Wee5, David Jeremiah Ming Siang Chee6, Camlyn Tan7, Hoon Chin Lim7. 1. Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore. tu.tian.ming@singhealth.com.sg. 2. Singhealth Duke-NUS Neuroscience Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore. tu.tian.ming@singhealth.com.sg. 3. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Centre of Quantitative Medicine, Office of Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Clinical Trials and Research Unit, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore. 7. Accident and Emergency Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke is a time-sensitive emergency where accurate diagnosis is required promptly. Due to time pressures, stroke mimics who present with similar signs and symptoms as acute ischemic stroke, pose a diagnostic challenge to the emergency physician. With limited access to investigative tools, clinical prediction, tools based only on clinical features, may be useful to identify stroke mimics. We aim to externally validate the performance of 4 stroke mimic prediction scales, and derive a novel decision tree, to improve identification of stroke mimics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study at a primary stroke centre, served by a telestroke hub. We included consecutive patients who were administered intravenous thrombolysis for suspected acute ischemic stroke from January 2015 to October 2017. Four stroke mimic prediction tools (FABS, simplified FABS, Telestroke Mimic Score and Khan Score) were rated simultaneously, using only clinical information prior to administration of thrombolysis. The final diagnosis was ascertained by an independent stroke neurologist. Area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) analysis was performed. A classification tree analysis was also conducted using variables which were found to be significant in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: Telestroke Mimic Score had the highest discrimination for stroke mimics among the 4 scores tested (AUROC = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63-0.87). However, all 4 scores performed similarly (DeLong p > 0.05). Telestroke Mimic Score had the highest sensitivity (91.3%), while Khan score had the highest specificity (88.2%). All 4 scores had high positive predictive value (88.1 to 97.5%) and low negative predictive values (4.7 to 32.3%). A novel decision tree, using only age, presence of migraine and psychiatric history, had a higher prediction performance (AUROC = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Four tested stroke mimic prediction scales performed similarly to identify stroke mimics in the emergency setting. A novel decision tree may improve the identification of stroke mimics.
BACKGROUND:Acute ischemic stroke is a time-sensitive emergency where accurate diagnosis is required promptly. Due to time pressures, stroke mimics who present with similar signs and symptoms as acute ischemic stroke, pose a diagnostic challenge to the emergency physician. With limited access to investigative tools, clinical prediction, tools based only on clinical features, may be useful to identify stroke mimics. We aim to externally validate the performance of 4 stroke mimic prediction scales, and derive a novel decision tree, to improve identification of stroke mimics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study at a primary stroke centre, served by a telestroke hub. We included consecutive patients who were administered intravenous thrombolysis for suspected acute ischemic stroke from January 2015 to October 2017. Four stroke mimic prediction tools (FABS, simplified FABS, Telestroke Mimic Score and Khan Score) were rated simultaneously, using only clinical information prior to administration of thrombolysis. The final diagnosis was ascertained by an independent stroke neurologist. Area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) analysis was performed. A classification tree analysis was also conducted using variables which were found to be significant in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: Telestroke Mimic Score had the highest discrimination for stroke mimics among the 4 scores tested (AUROC = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63-0.87). However, all 4 scores performed similarly (DeLong p > 0.05). Telestroke Mimic Score had the highest sensitivity (91.3%), while Khan score had the highest specificity (88.2%). All 4 scores had high positive predictive value (88.1 to 97.5%) and low negative predictive values (4.7 to 32.3%). A novel decision tree, using only age, presence of migraine and psychiatric history, had a higher prediction performance (AUROC = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Four tested stroke mimic prediction scales performed similarly to identify stroke mimics in the emergency setting. A novel decision tree may improve the identification of stroke mimics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adults; Clinical decision-making; Humans; Predictive value of tests; Stroke/etiology; Thrombolytic therapy; Tissue plasminogen activator
Authors: Susmita Chennareddy; Roshini Kalagara; Colton Smith; Stavros Matsoukas; Abhiraj Bhimani; John Liang; Steven Shapiro; Reade De Leacy; Maxim Mokin; Johanna T Fifi; J Mocco; Christopher P Kellner Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Lucinda Tran; Longting Lin; Neil Spratt; Andrew Bivard; Beng Lim Alvin Chew; James W Evans; William O'Brien; Christopher Levi; Timothy Ang; Khaled Alanati; Elizabeth Pepper; Carlos Garcia-Esperon; Mark Parsons Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 4.003