Literature DB >> 32635774

A review of varicocele treatment and fertility outcomes.

Abha Maheshwari1, Asif Muneer2, Marc Lucky3, Raj Mathur4, Kevin McEleny5.   

Abstract

Varicoceles are reported to be present in a significant proportion of men presenting with subfertility and are more common amongst this group than in the general population. Opinion still remains divided amongst clinicians managing male factor infertility as to whether varicoceles alter the probability of spontaneous conception and/or pregnancy and live birth rates after fertility treatment. The debate as to whether varicoceles should be treated or not has intensified in recent years. This is due to the concerns regarding the impact of varicoceles on not only conventional semen parameters, but also the potential effects that they may have at the cellular level (an increase in circulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting in sperm DNA fragmentation, even when conventional semen parameters are within the normal reference ranges). It has been suggested that treating the varicocele may result in improvements in the semen parameters, the fertilization and pregnancy rates for both spontaneous pregnancy as well as following in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. ICSI can still be used for Assisted Reproduction Treatment (ART) in the presence of suboptimal semen parameters. However, it is an invasive and expensive technique with potential adverse effects on the offspring. As far as we are aware, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical/cost effectiveness of varicocele treatment versus the immediate use of ICSI on pregnancy rates. Previous modelling exercises are old and do not take into consideration current practices and trends such as rising female age and time to pregnancy. The conflicting advice that patients sometimes receive, challenges our commitment to evidence-based practice. The only way to resolve the controversy is to undertake an appropriately powered randomized trial, assessing clinical- and cost-effectiveness and the time to pregnancy following varicocele treatment and comparing this to a no treatment group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Azoospermia; ICSI; IVF; Varicocele; male infertility; surgical sperm retrieval

Year:  2020        PMID: 32635774     DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1785117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)        ISSN: 1464-7273            Impact factor:   2.767


  2 in total

1.  Availability of services for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility in The Gambia`s public and private health facilities: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Anna Afferri; Haddijatou Allen; Susan Dierickx; Mustapha Bittaye; Musa Marena; Allan Pacey; Julie Balen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  The Negative Impact of Varicocele on Basic Semen Parameters, Sperm Nuclear DNA Dispersion and Oxidation-Reduction Potential in Semen.

Authors:  Kamil Gill; Michal Kups; Patryk Harasny; Tomasz Machalowski; Marta Grabowska; Mariusz Lukaszuk; Marcin Matuszewski; Ewa Duchnik; Monika Fraczek; Maciej Kurpisz; Malgorzata Piasecka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.