| Literature DB >> 32635420 |
Antonio Real-Hohn1, Rong Zhu2, Haleh Ganjian3, Nahla Ibrahim4, Peter Hinterdorfer2, Heinrich Kowalski1, Dieter Blaas1.
Abstract
The neutrophil extracellular trap (ET) is a eukaryotic host defense machinery that operates by capturing and concentrating pathogens in a filamentous network manufactured by neutrophils and made of DNA, histones, and many other components. Respiratory virus-induced ETs are involved in tissue damage and impairment of the alveolar-capillary barrier, but they also aid in fending off infection. We found that the small organic compound pyridostatin (PDS) forms somewhat similar fibrillary structures in Tris buffer in a concentration-dependent manner. Common cold viruses promote this process and become entrapped in the network, decreasing their infectivity by about 70% in tissue culture. We propose studying this novel mechanism of virus inhibition for its utility in preventing viral infection.Entities:
Keywords: Enterovirus; Rhinovirus; extracellular traps; filament; pyridostatin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32635420 PMCID: PMC7412420 DOI: 10.3390/v12070723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Formation of PDS fibrils under various conditions. (a) The structural formula of pyridostatin; for atom colour codes, see lower right. (b) PDS (4 µM) in water was applied to freshly cleaved mica, incubated for 5 min, and viewed by AFM. (c) As (b) but with 4 µM PDS in PBS instead of water. (d) PDS dissolved in the solutions indicated at 200 µM was applied onto EM grids, stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.4), and imaged by TEM. The white arrowheads point to small amorphous aggregates, the black arrows to ‘protofibrils’. (e) PDS dissolved in Tris buffer at the concentrations indicated was applied to an EM grid, stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.4), and imaged by TEM. (f) SYTO82 at 5 µM in Tris buffer +/- PDS at the final concentrations indicated was transferred to a quartz cuvette and the fluorescence signal acquired at room temperature (excitation 541 nm ⁄ emission 560 nm). Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, revealing that the values are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). n = 3.
Figure 2PDS fibrils entrap various RVs. (a) RV-A2 (1 µg/mL) was mixed with PDS at 20 µM in Tris buffer, transferred onto EM grids, stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.4), and viewed by TEM. (b) HeLa cells, 80% confluent, were either infected with RV-A2, RV-B14, or RV-A89, respectively (controls), or pre-incubated with 20 µM PDS in Tris buffer for 30 min on ice prior to infection as above. The samples were diluted 10 times in infection medium plus 25 mM NH4Cl and added to the cells. One hour post-challenge, the medium was replaced with fresh infection medium without NH4Cl to initiate uncoating. As a second control, NH4Cl was maintained throughout the experiment. At 8 h post-infection, the cells were prepared for immunofluorescence, and the number of cells producing viral antigen, indicating infection, was determined in a TissueFAXS. The average and standard error of the mean of infected cells from three independent assays were plotted. The figure was prepared and the significance levels determined by using GraphPad Prism 6.0 using one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.0001 vs. RVs without PDS.