Literature DB >> 32634738

Which bilinguals reverse language dominance and why?

Mathieu Declerck1, Daniel Kleinman2, Tamar H Gollan3.   

Abstract

When naming pictures in mixed-language blocks, bilinguals sometimes exhibit reversed language dominance effects. These have been attributed to proactive inhibitory control of the dominant language, or adaptation of language-specific selection thresholds. Even though reversed dominance arguably provides the most striking evidence of inhibition, few studies have focused on when and why this effect occurs. We investigated this topic in a large data set (>400 bilinguals) using a continuous and objective measure of language dominance. We found larger reversed language dominance effects in more (vs. less) balanced bilinguals in mixed-language blocks. However, after taking into account standard language dominance effects in single-language blocks, the extent to which dominance effects changed across block types was actually significantly smaller for more balanced bilinguals, which is in line with the inhibitory control account. Interestingly, dominance reversal was not associated with increased overall speed in the mixed-language block. Thus, dominance reversal is more likely in balanced bilinguals not because they are better at applying proactive control, but because they are more likely to overshoot when the goal is to make both languages about equally accessible - and overall, unbalanced bilinguals apply more proactive control than balanced bilinguals to facilitate picture naming in mixed-language blocks.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balanced bilingualism; Proactive control; Reversed language dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32634738      PMCID: PMC7494617          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

1.  Different inhibitory control components predict different levels of language control in bilinguals.

Authors:  Shuhua Li; Mona Roxana Botezatu; Man Zhang; Taomei Guo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  Language-switch Costs from Comprehension to Production Might Just Be Task-switch Costs.

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2021-12-01

3.  Translation Distractors Facilitate Production in Single- and Mixed-Language Picture Naming.

Authors:  Brendan Tomoschuk; Victor S Ferreira; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.842

4.  Within-language lexical interference can be resolved in a similar way to between-language interference.

Authors:  Iva Ivanova; Dacia Carolina Hernandez
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-07-01

5.  What Cognates Reveal about Default Language Selection in Bilingual Sentence Production.

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.521

6.  The temporal dynamics of bilingual language control.

Authors:  Iva Ivanova; Andrea Seanez; Mackenzie Cochran; Daniel Kleinman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.