Literature DB >> 32634695

Identifying key drivers for geospatial variation of grain micronutrient concentrations in major maize production regions of China.

Qing-Yue Zhao1, Shi-Jie Xu1, Wu-Shuai Zhang2, Zhe Zhang1, Zhi Yao2, Xin-Ping Chen2, Chun-Qin Zou3.   

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies are prevalent health problems worldwide. The maintenance of adequate concentrations of micronutrients in maize grain is crucial for human health. We investigated the overall status and geospatial variation of micronutrients in Chinese maize grains and identified their key drivers. A field survey was conducted in four major maize production areas of China in 2017 with 980 pairs of soil and grain samples collected from famers' fields. At a national scale, grain zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn) and copper (Cu) concentrations varied substantially, with average values of 17.4, 17.3, 4.9, and 1.5 mg kg-1, respectively, suggesting a solid gap between grain Zn and Fe concentrations and the biofortification target values. Significant regional difference in the concentrations of Zn, Mn and Cu, but not Fe, were observed in grain, with much higher levels in Southwest China. The nutritional yields of Zn, Fe and Cu were lower than the energy and Mn yields, indicating an unbalanced output between energy and micronutrients in current maize production system. Grain Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu correlated negatively with maize yield in most test regions. Increased nitrogen (N) rate positively affected grain Zn and Cu, while increased phosphorus (P) rate negatively affects grain Zn and Fe. Apart from Fe, available Zn, Mn and Cu in soil exerted significant positive effects on grain Zn, Mn and Cu concentrations, respectively. Decrease in soil pH and increase in the organic matter content may increase the accumulation of Fe and Mn in grain. Grain Zn and Cu concentrations increased as available soil P decreased. Of the factors considered in this study, grain yield, N and P rates, soil pH and organic matter were the main factors that affect grain micronutrient status and should be more extensively considered in the production and nutritional quality of maize grain.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geospatial variation; Influencing factors; Maize grain; Micronutrients

Year:  2020        PMID: 32634695     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  3 in total

1.  Siderophore production by Bacillus subtilis MF497446 and Pseudomonas koreensis MG209738 and their efficacy in controlling Cephalosporium maydis in maize plant.

Authors:  Nasr Ghazy; Sahar El-Nahrawy
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Iron Deficiency Tolerance in Maize.

Authors:  Jianqin Xu; Xiaoyang Zhu; Fang Yan; Huaqing Zhu; Xiuyu Zhou; Futong Yu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Root engineering in maize by increasing cytokinin degradation causes enhanced root growth and leaf mineral enrichment.

Authors:  Eswarayya Ramireddy; Hilde Nelissen; Jan Erik Leuendorf; Mieke Van Lijsebettens; Dirk Inzé; Thomas Schmülling
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.