Literature DB >> 32633674

Evaluating Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Histologic Validation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT with Comparison to Multiparametric MRI.

Liza Lindenberg1, Esther Mena1, Baris Turkbey1, Joanna H Shih1, Sarah E Reese1, Stephanie A Harmon1, Ilhan Lim1, Frank Lin1, Anita Ton1, Yolanda L McKinney1, Philip Eclarinal1, Deborah E Citrin1, William Dahut1, Ravi Madan1, Bradford J Wood1, Venkatesh Krishnasamy1, Richard Chang1, Elliot Levy1, Peter Pinto1, Janet F Eary1, Peter L Choyke1.   

Abstract

Background Prostate cancer recurrence is found in up to 40% of men with prior definitive (total prostatectomy or whole-prostate radiation) treatment. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET agents such as 2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine 3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL) may improve detection of recurrence compared with multiparametric MRI; however, histopathologic validation is lacking. Purpose To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT based on histologic analysis and to compare with pelvic multiparametric MRI in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Men were prospectively recruited after prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy with rising prostate-specific antigen level (median, 2.27 ng/mL; range, 0.2-27.45 ng/mL) and a negative result at conventional imaging (bone scan and/or CT). Participants underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and 3.0-T pelvic multiparametric MRI. Statistical analysis included Wald and modified χ2 tests. Results A total of 323 lesions were visualized in 77 men by using 18F-DCFPyL or multiparametric MRI, with imaging detection concordance of 25% (82 of 323) when including all lesions in the MRI field of view and 53% (52 of 99) when only assessing prostate bed lesions. 18F-DCFPyL depicted more pelvic lymph nodes than did MRI (128 vs 23 nodes). Histologic validation was obtained in 80 locations with sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of 69% (25 of 36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 51%, 88%), 91% (40 of 44; 95% CI: 74%, 98%), and 86% (25 of 29; 95% CI: 73%, 97%) for 18F-DCFPyL and 69% (24 of 35; 95% CI: 50%, 86%), 74% (31 of 42; 95% CI: 42%, 89%), and 69% (24 of 35; 95% CI: 50%, 88%) for multiparametric MRI (P = .95, P = .14, and P = .07, respectively). In the prostate bed, sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were 57% (13 of 23; 95% CI: 32%, 81%), 86% (18 of 21; 95% CI: 73%, 100%), and 81% (13 of 16; 95% CI: 59%, 100%) for 18F-DCFPyL and 83% (19 of 23; 95% CI: 59%, 100%), 52% (11 of 21; 95% CI: 29%, 74%), and 66% (19 of 29; 95% CI: 44%, 86%) for multiparametric MRI (P = .19, P = .02, and P = .17, respectively). The addition of 18F-DCFPyL to multiparametric MRI improved PPV by 38% overall (P = .02) and by 30% (P = .09) in the prostate bed. Conclusion Findings with 2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine 3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL) were histologically validated and demonstrated high specificity and positive predictive value. In the pelvis, 18F-DCFPyL depicted more lymph nodes and improved positive predictive value and specificity when added to multiparametric MRI. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zukotynski and Rowe in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32633674      PMCID: PMC7457947          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  Pearson's chi-square test and rank correlation inferences for clustered data.

Authors:  Joanna H Shih; Michael P Fay
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Future Perspectives and Challenges of Prostate MR Imaging.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Initial Evaluation of [(18)F]DCFPyL for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Zsolt Szabo; Esther Mena; Steven P Rowe; Donika Plyku; Rosa Nidal; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Hong Fan; Robert F Dannals; Ying Chen; Ronnie C Mease; Melin Vranesic; Akrita Bhatnagar; George Sgouros; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Single-Center Prospective Evaluation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Courtney Lawhn-Heath; Robert R Flavell; Spencer C Behr; Thomas Yohannan; Kirsten L Greene; Felix Feng; Peter R Carroll; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis.

Authors:  Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Bernd Vollnberg; Ian Alberts; Alexandrine Bähler; Christos Sachpekidis; Lotte Dijkstra; Fabian Haupt; Silvan Boxler; Tobias Gross; Tim Holland-Letz; George Thalmann; Johannes Heverhagen; Axel Rominger; Kirsi Härmä; Martin H Maurer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Treatment Outcomes from 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Informed Salvage Radiation Treatment in Men with Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy: Prognostic Value of a Negative PSMA PET.

Authors:  Louise Emmett; Pim J van Leeuwen; Rohan Nandurkar; Matthijs J Scheltema; Thomas Cusick; George Hruby; Andrew Kneebone; Thomas Eade; Gerald Fogarty; Raj Jagavkar; Quoc Nguyen; Bao Ho; Anthony M Joshua; Phillip Stricker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence after external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  L M Wu; J-R Xu; H Y Gu; J Hua; J Zhu; J Chen; W Zhang; J Hu
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Isabel Rauscher; Tobias Maurer; Ambros J Beer; Frank-Philipp Graner; Bernhard Haller; Gregor Weirich; Alan Doherty; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Julie Y An; Abhinav Sidana; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J. Wood; Peter A Pinto; İsmail Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.021

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mars Shot for Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Molecularly Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Bonnie Clarke; Alexander Drzezga; Liza Lindenberg; Arman Rahmim; James Thackeray; Gary A Ulaner; Wolfgang Weber; Katherine Zukotynski; John Sunderland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.082

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.