OBJECTIVE: Explore the perspective of patients and professionals regarding non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and to define the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment in order to identify unmet needs during the process. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out in two phases. In the first part, five focus groups were held with rheumatologists, orthopaedist, physiotherapists, primary care physicians (PCP), radiologists and six narrative interviews with nr-axSpA patients. In the second part, a nominal group meeting was held to detect which needs were not covered in the nr-axSpA (all of whom had collaborated in the previous phase). RESULTS: The topics discussed with professional groups and patients were the appropriateness of the term and concept of nr-axSpA, the management of low back pain and inflammatory back pain in routine clinical practice, complementary test and the problem of waiting lists and finally the unmet needs both from a practitioner's and a patient's perspective. The final group explored solutions to the problems based on what was discussed in the first part of the project. Some of these solutions were strengthening relations between specialties, implementing high resolution consultations, rethinking the disability scales, offering better information to patients, designing resource maps and using different strategies to promote knowledge of the disease. CONCLUSION: Many different perspectives on the same disease have revealed the difficult journey of the patient with suspected nr-axSpA, while identifying problems and solutions. Key Points • Diagnosis of nr-AxSpA among health professionals outside rheumatology may lead to numerous turns and difficulties in the patient's journey. • The impact of delays and complications in the journey to diagnosis is not quantified but directly affects the state of well-being and health of patients. • Multidisciplinary care is far from a reality. Primary care (key specialists in any chronic condition), radiologists, orthopaedists, and non-physicians such as physiotherapists and psychologists are generally excluded from dealing with these patients, and often have to do their work outside of physicians, rather than working together in a truly patient-centred medicine.
OBJECTIVE: Explore the perspective of patients and professionals regarding non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and to define the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment in order to identify unmet needs during the process. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out in two phases. In the first part, five focus groups were held with rheumatologists, orthopaedist, physiotherapists, primary care physicians (PCP), radiologists and six narrative interviews with nr-axSpA patients. In the second part, a nominal group meeting was held to detect which needs were not covered in the nr-axSpA (all of whom had collaborated in the previous phase). RESULTS: The topics discussed with professional groups and patients were the appropriateness of the term and concept of nr-axSpA, the management of low back pain and inflammatory back pain in routine clinical practice, complementary test and the problem of waiting lists and finally the unmet needs both from a practitioner's and a patient's perspective. The final group explored solutions to the problems based on what was discussed in the first part of the project. Some of these solutions were strengthening relations between specialties, implementing high resolution consultations, rethinking the disability scales, offering better information to patients, designing resource maps and using different strategies to promote knowledge of the disease. CONCLUSION: Many different perspectives on the same disease have revealed the difficult journey of the patient with suspected nr-axSpA, while identifying problems and solutions. Key Points • Diagnosis of nr-AxSpA among health professionals outside rheumatology may lead to numerous turns and difficulties in the patient's journey. • The impact of delays and complications in the journey to diagnosis is not quantified but directly affects the state of well-being and health of patients. • Multidisciplinary care is far from a reality. Primary care (key specialists in any chronic condition), radiologists, orthopaedists, and non-physicians such as physiotherapists and psychologists are generally excluded from dealing with these patients, and often have to do their work outside of physicians, rather than working together in a truly patient-centred medicine.
Entities:
Keywords:
Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis; Patient’s journey; Qualitative study
Authors: Désirée van der Heijde; Sofia Ramiro; Robert Landewé; Xenofon Baraliakos; Filip Van den Bosch; Alexandre Sepriano; Andrea Regel; Adrian Ciurea; Hanne Dagfinrud; Maxime Dougados; Floris van Gaalen; Pál Géher; Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma; Robert D Inman; Merryn Jongkees; Uta Kiltz; Tore K Kvien; Pedro M Machado; Helena Marzo-Ortega; Anna Molto; Victoria Navarro-Compàn; Salih Ozgocmen; Fernando M Pimentel-Santos; John Reveille; Martin Rudwaleit; Jochen Sieper; Percival Sampaio-Barros; Dieter Wiek; Jürgen Braun Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Joachim Sieper; Xiaohan Hu; Christopher M Black; Kim Grootscholten; Remon W M van den Broek; Sumesh Kachroo Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: José María Pego-Reigosa; Carlos Peña-Gil; David Rodríguez-Lorenzo; Irene Altabás-González; Naír Pérez-Gómez; John Henry Guzmán-Castro; Rodrigo Varela-Gestoso; Reyes Díaz-Lambarri; Alberto González-Carreró-López; Olga Míguez-Senra; Julia Bóveda-Fontán; Ángeles Charle-Crespo; Francisco Javier Caramés-Casal; Ceferino Barbazán-Álvarez; Íñigo Hernández-Rodríguez; Francisco Maceiras-Pan; Marina Rodríguez-López; Rafael Melero-González; José Benito Rodríguez-Fernández Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Divya Shridharmurthy; Kate L Lapane; Sara Khan; Esther Yi; Jonggyu Baek; Jonathan Kay; Shao-Hsien Liu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 3.752