Zhou Li1, Juan de Dios Redondo Ntutumu2, Shengyi Huang2, Zhai Cai2, Shuai Han3, A I Balde2, Zeyu Luo2, Suzhen Fang2. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Avenue, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510282, Guangdong, China. gzlizhou@smu.edu.com. 2. Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Avenue, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510282, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Avenue, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510282, Guangdong, China. gzhanbo0624@smu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are effective treatment options for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We compared the short-term outcomes of surgery plus HIPEC and CRS alone for PC. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for PC at a single center from 2014 to 2019 using the Chinese CRS-HIPEC patient database at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: surgery plus HIPEC (450) and surgery alone (200). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. The postoperative outcomes, mortality, and length of hospital stay were compared between the surgery plus HIPEC and CRS alone groups. RESULTS: Propensity scoring generated 162 pairs. There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate between the groups (0% vs 0%, P = 1.000), and the morbidity rates were similar in both groups (7.4% vs 8.0%, P = 0.835). The surgery plus HIPEC group had a longer operative time (247.81 ± 64.70 vs 184.55 ± 29.56, P ≤ 0.001) and a slightly longer postoperative hospital stay (14.64 ± 5.24 vs 12.59 ± 3.76, P ≤ 0.001). No other baseline characteristics were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery plus HIPEC is feasible for select patients and is associated with prolonged surgery times and prolonged hospital stays, and there is no significant difference in mortality rates or postoperative outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are effective treatment options for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We compared the short-term outcomes of surgery plus HIPEC and CRS alone for PC. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for PC at a single center from 2014 to 2019 using the Chinese CRS-HIPEC patient database at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: surgery plus HIPEC (450) and surgery alone (200). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. The postoperative outcomes, mortality, and length of hospital stay were compared between the surgery plus HIPEC and CRS alone groups. RESULTS: Propensity scoring generated 162 pairs. There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate between the groups (0% vs 0%, P = 1.000), and the morbidity rates were similar in both groups (7.4% vs 8.0%, P = 0.835). The surgery plus HIPEC group had a longer operative time (247.81 ± 64.70 vs 184.55 ± 29.56, P ≤ 0.001) and a slightly longer postoperative hospital stay (14.64 ± 5.24 vs 12.59 ± 3.76, P ≤ 0.001). No other baseline characteristics were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery plus HIPEC is feasible for select patients and is associated with prolonged surgery times and prolonged hospital stays, and there is no significant difference in mortality rates or postoperative outcomes.
Authors: Jan Franko; Qian Shi; Charles D Goldman; Barbara A Pockaj; Garth D Nelson; Richard M Goldberg; Henry C Pitot; Axel Grothey; Steven R Alberts; Daniel J Sargent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: O Glehen; D Osinsky; E Cotte; F Kwiatkowski; G Freyer; S Isaac; V Trillet-Lenoir; A C Sayag-Beaujard; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: B Sadeghi; C Arvieux; O Glehen; A C Beaujard; M Rivoire; J Baulieux; E Fontaumard; A Brachet; J L Caillot; J L Faure; J Porcheron; J L Peix; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: O Glehen; F Mithieux; D Osinsky; A C Beaujard; G Freyer; Ph Guertsch; Y Francois; P Peyrat; G Panteix; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vic J Verwaal; Serge van Ruth; Eeclo de Bree; Gooike W van Sloothen; Harm van Tinteren; Henk Boot; Frans A N Zoetmulder Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544