Literature DB >> 32632008

The environmental stress response causes ribosome loss in aneuploid yeast cells.

Allegra Terhorst1, Arzu Sandikci1, Abigail Keller2, Charles A Whittaker1, Maitreya J Dunham2, Angelika Amon3.   

Abstract

Aneuploidy, a condition characterized by whole chromosome gains and losses, is often associated with significant cellular stress and decreased fitness. However, how cells respond to the aneuploid state has remained controversial. In aneuploid budding yeast, two opposing gene-expression patterns have been reported: the "environmental stress response" (ESR) and the "common aneuploidy gene-expression" (CAGE) signature, in which many ESR genes are oppositely regulated. Here, we investigate this controversy. We show that the CAGE signature is not an aneuploidy-specific gene-expression signature but the result of normalizing the gene-expression profile of actively proliferating aneuploid cells to that of euploid cells grown into stationary phase. Because growth into stationary phase is among the strongest inducers of the ESR, the ESR in aneuploid cells was masked when stationary phase euploid cells were used for normalization in transcriptomic studies. When exponentially growing euploid cells are used in gene-expression comparisons with aneuploid cells, the CAGE signature is no longer evident in aneuploid cells. Instead, aneuploid cells exhibit the ESR. We further show that the ESR causes selective ribosome loss in aneuploid cells, providing an explanation for the decreased cellular density of aneuploid cells. We conclude that aneuploid budding yeast cells mount the ESR, rather than the CAGE signature, in response to aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses, resulting in selective ribosome loss. We propose that the ESR serves two purposes in aneuploid cells: protecting cells from aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses and preventing excessive cellular enlargement during slowed cell cycles by down-regulating translation capacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAGE; ESR; aneuploidy; ribosome loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32632008      PMCID: PMC7382292          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005648117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  GenePattern 2.0.

Authors:  Michael Reich; Ted Liefeld; Joshua Gould; Jim Lerner; Pablo Tamayo; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  mTORC1 Controls Phase Separation and the Biophysical Properties of the Cytoplasm by Tuning Crowding.

Authors:  M Delarue; G P Brittingham; S Pfeffer; I V Surovtsev; S Pinglay; K J Kennedy; M Schaffer; J I Gutierrez; D Sang; G Poterewicz; J K Chung; J M Plitzko; J T Groves; C Jacobs-Wagner; B D Engel; L J Holt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Decoupling Yeast Cell Division and Stress Defense Implicates mRNA Repression in Translational Reallocation during Stress.

Authors:  Yi-Hsuan Ho; Evgenia Shishkova; James Hose; Joshua J Coon; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast.

Authors:  Norman Pavelka; Giulia Rancati; Jin Zhu; William D Bradford; Anita Saraf; Laurence Florens; Brian W Sanderson; Gaye L Hattem; Rong Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Chromosome-Specific and Global Effects of Aneuploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Stacie E Dodgson; Sharon Kim; Michael Costanzo; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Darcy L Morse; Chris A Kaiser; Charles Boone; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome.

Authors:  Bo Li; Colin N Dewey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Excessive Cell Growth Causes Cytoplasm Dilution And Contributes to Senescence.

Authors:  Gabriel E Neurohr; Rachel L Terry; Jette Lengefeld; Megan Bonney; Gregory P Brittingham; Fabien Moretto; Teemu P Miettinen; Laura Pontano Vaites; Luis M Soares; Joao A Paulo; J Wade Harper; Stephen Buratowski; Scott Manalis; Folkert J van Werven; Liam J Holt; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A comparison of gene set analysis methods in terms of sensitivity, prioritization and specificity.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Gaurav Bhatti; Roberto Romero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The genetic basis of aneuploidy tolerance in wild yeast.

Authors:  James Hose; Leah E Escalante; Katie J Clowers; H Auguste Dutcher; DeElegant Robinson; Venera Bouriakov; Joshua J Coon; Evgenia Shishkova; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effects of aneuploidy on cell behaviour and function.

Authors:  Rong Li; Jin Zhu
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 113.915

2.  Aneuploidy-induced proteotoxic stress can be effectively tolerated without dosage compensation, genetic mutations, or stress responses.

Authors:  Katherine E Larrimore; Natalia S Barattin-Voynova; David W Reid; Davis T W Ng
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 7.431

3.  Cell competition removes segmental aneuploid cells from Drosophila imaginal disc-derived tissues based on ribosomal protein gene dose.

Authors:  Zhejun Ji; Jacky Chuen; Marianthi Kiparaki; Nicholas Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Predominantly inverse modulation of gene expression in genomically unbalanced disomic haploid maize.

Authors:  Hua Yang; Xiaowen Shi; Chen Chen; Jie Hou; Tieming Ji; Jianlin Cheng; James A Birchler
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 12.085

5.  The impact of monosomies, trisomies and segmental aneuploidies on chromosomal stability.

Authors:  Dorine C Hintzen; Mar Soto; Michael Schubert; Bjorn Bakker; Diana C J Spierings; Karoly Szuhai; Peter M Lansdorp; Roel J C Kluin; Floris Foijer; René H Medema; Jonne A Raaijmakers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.