| Literature DB >> 32631927 |
Karl Peter Sylvester1,2, Nigel Clayton3, Ian Cliff4, Michael Hepple4, Adrian Kendrick5, Jane Kirkby6, Martin Miller7, Alan Moore8, Gerrard Francis Rafferty9, Liam O'Reilly10, Joanna Shakespeare10, Laurie Smith6,11, Trefor Watts12, Martyn Bucknall13, Keith Butterfield14.
Abstract
The Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology (ARTP) last produced a statement on the performance of lung function testing in 1994. At that time the focus was on a practical statement for people working in lung function laboratories. Since that time there have been many technological advances and alterations to best practice in the measurement and interpretation of lung function assessments. In light of these advances an update was warranted. ARTP, therefore, have provided within this document, where available, the most up-to-date and evidence-based recommendations for the most common lung function assessments performed in laboratories across the UK. These recommendations set out the requirements and considerations that need to be made in terms of environmental and patient factors that may influence both the performance and interpretation of lung function tests. They also incorporate procedures to ensure quality assured diagnostic investigations that include those associated with equipment, the healthcare professional conducting the assessments and the results achieved by the subject. Each section aims to outline the common parameters provided for each investigation, a brief principle behind the measurements (where applicable), and suggested acceptability and reproducibility criteria. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: lung physiology; respiratory measurement; respiratory muscles
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32631927 PMCID: PMC7337892 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res ISSN: 2052-4439