Subba Rao V Kanchustambam1, Amit Sharma2, Zane Perkins3, Ameet Patel4. 1. Royal Blackburn Hospital, UK. Electronic address: subba.kanchustambam@nhs.net. 2. William Harvey Hospital, UK. 3. The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, UK. 4. Kings College Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Dilatation of the pancreatic duct and common bile duct, known as double duct sign (DDS), suggests sinister pathology at the periampullary region. Non-jaundiced patients with incidental DDS and otherwise normal cross-sectional imaging present a diagnostic dilemma to the multidisciplinary team (MDT). The primary aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in detecting causal pathology in this patient population. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane database and PROSPERO) was performed to identify original studies that reported EUS findings in patients with incidental DDS. Primary outcome was detection of a periampullary tumour. Secondary outcome was detection of benign causal pathology. Meta-analysis was used to calculate an absolute measure (pooled proportion) of pathology detection. RESULTS: Four studies (177 patients) were included. EUS detection rate for a periampullary tumour was 5% (95% CI, 0-10%) including both adenocarcinomas and adenomas. EUS detection rate for benign causal pathology was 22% (95% CI, 10-34%), the most common being chronic pancreatitis CONCLUSION: Non-jaundiced patients with incidental DDS on cross-sectional imaging have a 5% risk of a periampullary tumour that can be detected by EUS. Crown
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Dilatation of the pancreatic duct and common bile duct, known as double duct sign (DDS), suggests sinister pathology at the periampullary region. Non-jaundicedpatients with incidental DDS and otherwise normal cross-sectional imaging present a diagnostic dilemma to the multidisciplinary team (MDT). The primary aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in detecting causal pathology in this patient population. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane database and PROSPERO) was performed to identify original studies that reported EUS findings in patients with incidental DDS. Primary outcome was detection of a periampullary tumour. Secondary outcome was detection of benign causal pathology. Meta-analysis was used to calculate an absolute measure (pooled proportion) of pathology detection. RESULTS: Four studies (177 patients) were included. EUS detection rate for a periampullary tumour was 5% (95% CI, 0-10%) including both adenocarcinomas and adenomas. EUS detection rate for benign causal pathology was 22% (95% CI, 10-34%), the most common being chronic pancreatitis CONCLUSION:Non-jaundicedpatients with incidental DDS on cross-sectional imaging have a 5% risk of a periampullary tumour that can be detected by EUS. Crown