| Literature DB >> 32631250 |
Henrik H Hansen1, Helene M Ægidius2, Denise Oró2, Simon S Evers2, Sara Heebøll3, Peter Lykke Eriksen3, Karen Louise Thomsen3, Anja Bengtsson2, Sanne S Veidal2, Michel Feigh2, Malte P Suppli4, Filip K Knop4,5,6, Henning Grønbæk3, Diego Miranda7, James L Trevaskis7, Niels Vrang2, Jacob Jelsing2, Kristoffer T G Rigbolt2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Animal models of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are important tools in preclinical research and drug discovery. Gubra-Amylin NASH (GAN) diet-induced obese (DIO) mice represent a model of fibrosing NASH. The present study directly assessed the clinical translatability of the model by head-to-head comparison of liver biopsy histological and transcriptome changes in GAN DIO-NASH mouse and human NASH patients.Entities:
Keywords: Diet-induced obesity; Glucose tolerance; Histomorphometry; Histopathology; Liver transcriptome; Mouse model; Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Translatability
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32631250 PMCID: PMC7336447 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01356-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1Similar liver histopathological hallmarks in human NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice. Upper panels: Representative photomicrographs of liver sections from human healthy normal-weight individual (a), NASH patient (b-e), chow-fed mouse (f) and GAN DIO-NASH mouse (g-j) stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE, for evaluation of steatosis, inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning; a-d, f-i) or picro-Sirius Red (PSR, for evaluation of fibrosis; e, j). Arrows indicate inflammatory foci and ballooning hepatocytes, respectively. Lower panels: Histomorphometric quantitative assessment of liver lipid accumulation (HE staining), inflammation (galectin-3 immunostaining) and fibrosis (PSR staining) in human and mouse liver biopsy sections. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control group, unpaired t-test
Comparison of liver biopsy histopathology scores in human NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice
| Group | Steatosis score | Inflammation score | Ballooning score | Fibrosis stage | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| Healthy normal-weight | 14 | 13 | 1 | – | – | 14 | – | – | 14 | – | – | 14 | – | – | – | – | ||
| NASH | 16 | – | – | 2 | 14 | – | 16 | – | – | 10 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 1 | – | – | ||
| Chow-fed lean mice | 10 | 10 | – | – | – | 10 | – | – | 10 | – | – | 10 | – | – | – | – | ||
| GAN DIO-NASH mice | 25 | – | – | – | 25 | – | 6 | 13 | 6 | 18 | 7 | – | 3 | 10 | 11 | 1 | – | |
Histopathology scores in liver biopsy samples from normal controls, human NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice. Histopathology was scored according to the criteria outlined by the NASH-Clinical Research Network [27].
Comparison of composite NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) in human NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice
| NAS | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Healthy normal-weight | 14 | 13 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| NASH | 16 | – | – | – | – | – | 12 | 4 | – | – | |
| Chow-fed lean mice | 10 | 10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| GAN DIO-NASH mice | 25 | – | – | – | – | 6 | 7 | 11 | 1 | – | |
Composite NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) in liver biopsy samples from normal controls, human NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice. Histopathology was scored according to the criteria outlined by the NASH-Clinical Research Network [27]
Fig. 2Liver transcriptome changes in human NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice. a Principal component analysis (PCA) of samples based on top 500 most variable gene expression levels. b Venn diagram depicting shared and separate differentially expressed genes (DEGs; false discovery rate < 0.05) in NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice. c Comparison of significantly regulated disease-associated Reactome signalling pathways in NASH patients (n = 16) and GAN-DIO NASH mice (n = 25). Reactome signalling pathways are grouped according to biological pathway. Color gradients indicate significantly upregulated (red color) and downregulated (blue color) pathways compared to corresponding control group (chow-fed mice, n = 10; healthy normal-weight human individuals, n = 14)
Fig. 4GAN DIO-NASH mice develop characteristics of the metabolic syndrome. Terminal body weight (a), whole-body fat mass (b), whole-body lean mass (c), liver weight (d). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01 (unpaired t-test; chow-fed mice, n = 6–10; GAN DIO-NASH mice, n = 14–16). An intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT) was performed one week before termination. (e) Glucose excursion curves (− 60 to 180 min). ***p < 0.001 (repeated-measure two-way ANOVA; chow-fed mice, n = 10; GAN DIO-NASH mice, n = 15). Insert, AUC-glucose levels (0–180 min). **p < 0.01 (unpaired t-test). Terminal plasma insulin (f) and HOMA-IR (g). ***p < 0.01 (unpaired t-test; chow-fed mice, n = 10; GAN DIO-NASH mice, n = 15). Terminal plasma leptin (h), total cholesterol (i), triglycerides (j) and free fatty acids (k). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01 (unpaired t-test; chow-fed mice, n = 5–10; GAN DIO-NASH mice, n = 8–15)
Fig. 3Regulation of disease-associated candidate genes in NASH patients and GAN DIO-NASH mice. a Disease-associated hepatic candidate genes, b Selected hepatic genes representing various drug targets for NASH. Color gradients indicate significantly upregulated (red color) and downregulated (blue color) gene expression in NASH patients (n = 16) and GAN DIO-NASH mice (n = 25) compared to corresponding control group (healthy normal-weight human individuals, n = 14; chow-fed mice, n = 10). Candidate genes are listed in Table S1
Elevated plasma and liver biochemical markers in GAN DIO-NASH mice
| Chow-fed C57BL/6 J mice | GAN DIO-NASH mice | |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma ALT (U/L) | 29.5 ± 1.9 | 166 ± 16*** |
| Plasma AST (U/L) | 65.4 ± 3.8 | 196 ± 16.8*** |
| Plasma total CK-18 (ng/ml) | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.12*** |
| Plasma MMP-9 (pg/ml) | 15,409 ± 554 | 21,445 ± 990*** |
| Plasma TIMP-1 (pg/ml) | 1151 ± 56 | 4099 ± 453*** |
| Liver TG (mg/g tissue) | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 94.0 ± 5.4*** |
| Liver TC (mg/g tissue) | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 14.1 ± 0.6*** |
| Liver HP (μg/mg tissue) | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01*** |
| Liver MMP-9 (pg/g tissue) | 183,196 ± 7725 | 328,529 ± 80,679 |
Abbreviations: ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CK-18 cytokeratin-18, FFA free fatty acids, HP hydroxyproline, MMP-9 matrix metalloproteinase-9, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides; TIMP-1 tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1.
***p < 0.001, unpaired t-test (chow-fed mice, n = 10; GAN DIO-NASH mice, n = 15)
Elevated plasma and liver cytokine levels in GAN DIO-NASH mice
| Cytokine/ | Chow-fed C57BL/6 J mice | GAN DIO-NASH mice | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | Liver | Plasma | Liver | |
| TNF-α | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 33 ± 2.8 | 15 ± 1.1*** | 78 ± 9.7*** |
| IL-1β | 349 ± 46 | 591 ± 79* | ||
| IL-2 | ||||
| IL-4 | ||||
| IL-5 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 12.4 ± 0.7* |
| IL-6 | 8.2 ± 1.0 | 507 ± 19.7 | 53.7 ± 18.0* | 478 ± 30 |
| IL-10 | 14 ± 0.5 | 91 ± 7.2 | 18 ± 1.6* | 97 ± 7.1 |
| IL12p70 | 530 ± 79 | 658 ± 44 | ||
| INF-γ | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 9.0 ± 1.9 | ||
| KC/GRO | 58 ± 7.4 | 352 ± 32 | 138 ± 9.8*** | 640 ± 91** |
| MCP-1 | 11 ± 0.8 | 171 ± 9.3 | 30 ± 4.7** | 1759 ± 304*** |
Plasma and liver cytokine levels in GAN DIO-NASH mice. n.d., not detected (below lower level of quantification; IL-1β, 0.42 pg/ml; IL-2, 0.66 pg/ml; IL-4, 0.42 pg/ml; IL12p70, 7.69 pg/ml; INF-γ, 0.23 pg/ml). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, unpaired t-test (chow-fed mice, n = 8; GAN DIO-NASH mice, n = 8)