Literature DB >> 32630834

Comments to the Editor Re: Papukashvili et al. Nutrients 2020, 12, 184.

Cyril Willson1.   

Abstract

Papukashvili et al [...].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32630834      PMCID: PMC7400195          DOI: 10.3390/nu12071965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


Papukashvili et al. [1] recently covered the enzyme semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO) as a potential molecular target for the management of obesity and related diseases. While the paper is interesting, there are aspects which require clarification as it relates to caffeine. First, the authors explain in the text of the paper that caffeine demonstrated an inhibitory concentration (IC) of 0.1–10 mM with an IC50 of 0.8 ± 0.3 mM (Table I incorrectly uses nM for the unit of measurement) for SSAO (from bovine serum) activity, which they claim roughly corresponds to 1–4 cups of regular coffee and is consistent with a daily dose of 400 mg of caffeine. However, this is not correct. The IC50 for caffeine of 0.8 mM (millimolar) is well beyond the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) that humans experience after 1–4 cups of coffee or 400 mg of caffeine [2]. For example, a 100 mg oral dose of caffeine administered as coffee produced a Cmax of approximately 2.5 mg/L, while 0.8 mM is equivalent to approximately 155 mg/L, which is nearly twice the known lethal concentration of 80 mg/L for humans [2]. Fredholm [3] noted long ago that because plasma caffeine concentrations experienced after humans ingest caffeine-containing beverages are typically below 100 µmol (0.1 mM) or around 19.4 mg/L, mechanisms explaining caffeine’s therapeutic effects should be sought in this range, while those requiring concentrations in the mM range are only of potential toxicological interest. Thus, like many potential targets of caffeine, SSAO does not appear to be relevant at non-toxic or non-lethal concentrations [2], an important distinction in order to avoid consumers being misled about the potential weight loss effects of caffeine based upon in vitro data [4]. Second, the authors indicate that caffeine is an effective agent for causing weight loss. However, the work cited, such as that by Westerterp-Plantenga et al. [5], did not provide caffeine as an intervention but rather a green tea extract to individuals who were habitual consumers of either high or low amounts of caffeine. Since the source of these subjects’ caffeine was mainly coffee, it would seem premature to conclude that caffeine alone was responsible. While caffeine itself is well known to increase lipolysis and thermogenesis, only a limited amount of the liberated fatty acids are oxidized in a resting state, leading to very limited, if any, effects upon fat mass or body weight [6,7,8]. There is some evidence that coffee or coffee extracts may produce small to modest weight and/or fat loss in humans but this would be unlikely to suffice as an actual treatment for obesity and importantly, these effects are unlikely to be due to caffeine alone [9,10].
  9 in total

1.  Body weight loss and weight maintenance in relation to habitual caffeine intake and green tea supplementation.

Authors:  Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga; Manuela P G M Lejeune; Eva M R Kovacs
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-07

2.  On the mechanism of action of theophylline and caffeine.

Authors:  B B Fredholm
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1985

Review 3.  Mechanisms of action of coffee bioactive components on lipid metabolism.

Authors:  Renalison Farias-Pereira; Cheon-Seok Park; Yeonhwa Park
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.391

4.  Metabolic effects of caffeine in humans: lipid oxidation or futile cycling?

Authors:  Kevin J Acheson; Gérard Gremaud; Isabelle Meirim; Franck Montigon; Yves Krebs; Laurent B Fay; Louis-Jean Gay; Philippe Schneiter; Charles Schindler; Luc Tappy
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  The effect and safety of an ephedrine/caffeine compound compared to ephedrine, caffeine and placebo in obese subjects on an energy restricted diet. A double blind trial.

Authors:  A Astrup; L Breum; S Toubro; P Hein; F Quaade
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1992-04

Review 6.  In vitro assays in natural products research - a matter of concentration and relevance to in vivo administration using resveratrol, α-mangostin/γ-mangostin and xanthohumol as examples.

Authors:  C M Willson; O Grundmann
Journal:  Nat Prod Res       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.488

Review 7.  The clinical toxicology of caffeine: A review and case study.

Authors:  Cyril Willson
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-11-03

8.  The Interaction between Coffee: Caffeine Consumption, UCP2 Gene Variation, and Adiposity in Adults-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Harry Freitag Luglio Muhammad; Dian Caturini Sulistyoningrum; Emy Huriyati; Yi Yi Lee; Wan Abdul Manan Wan Muda
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2019-01-02

Review 9.  Attenuation of Weight Gain and Prevention of Associated Pathologies by Inhibiting SSAO.

Authors:  Dimitri Papukashvili; Nino Rcheulishvili; Yulin Deng
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.