Literature DB >> 32628998

Under the rug: Abandoning persistent misconceptions that obfuscate organelle evolution.

Deise J P Gonçalves1, Robert K Jansen2, Tracey A Ruhlman3, Jennifer R Mandel4.   

Abstract

The advent and advance of next generation sequencing over the past two decades made it possible to accumulate large quantities of sequence reads that could be used to assemble complete or nearly complete organelle genomes (plastome or mitogenome). The result has been an explosive increase in the availability of organelle genome sequences with over 4000 different species of green plants currently available on GenBank. During the same time period, plant molecular biologists greatly enhanced the understanding of the structure, repair, replication, recombination, transcription and translation, and inheritance of organelle DNA. Unfortunately many plant evolutionary biologists are unaware of or have overlooked this knowledge, resulting in misrepresentation of several phenomena that are critical for phylogenetic and evolutionary studies using organelle genomes. We believe that confronting these misconceptions about organelle genome organization, composition, and inheritance will improve our understanding of the evolutionary processes that underly organelle evolution. Here we discuss four misconceptions that can limit evolutionary biology studies and lead to inaccurate phylogenies and incorrect structure of the organellar DNA used to infer organelle evolution.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chloroplast; Heteroplasmy; Mitochondria; Patterns of inheritance; Plastome phylogenies; Single locus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32628998     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  8 in total

1.  Clade-Specific Plastid Inheritance Patterns Including Frequent Biparental Inheritance in Passiflora Interspecific Crosses.

Authors:  Bikash Shrestha; Lawrence E Gilbert; Tracey A Ruhlman; Robert K Jansen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  The plastome sequence of Bactris gasipaes and evolutionary analysis in tribe Cocoseae (Arecaceae).

Authors:  Raquel Santos da Silva; Charles Roland Clement; Eduardo Balsanelli; Valter Antonio de Baura; Emanuel Maltempi de Souza; Hugo Pacheco de Freitas Fraga; Leila do Nascimento Vieira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Calophyllaceae plastomes, their structure and insights in relationships within the clusioids.

Authors:  Rafaela Jorge Trad; Fernanda Nunes Cabral; Volker Bittrich; Saura Rodrigues da Silva; Maria do Carmo Estanislau do Amaral
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  New plastomes of eight Ipomoea species and four putative hybrids from Eastern Amazon.

Authors:  Marcele Laux; Renato R M Oliveira; Santelmo Vasconcelos; Eder S Pires; Talvâne G L Lima; Mayara Pastore; Gisele L Nunes; Ronnie Alves; Guilherme Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Magnoliaceae Plastomes: Adding Neotropical Magnolia to the Discussion.

Authors:  Salvador Guzmán-Díaz; Fabián Augusto Aldaba Núñez; Emily Veltjen; Pieter Asselman; Isabel Larridon; Marie-Stéphanie Samain
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06

6.  Organelle Phylogenomics and Extensive Conflicting Phylogenetic Signals in the Monocot Order Poales.

Authors:  Hong Wu; Jun-Bo Yang; Jing-Xia Liu; De-Zhu Li; Peng-Fei Ma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Highly Resolved Papilionoid Legume Phylogeny Based on Plastid Phylogenomics.

Authors:  In-Su Choi; Domingos Cardoso; Luciano P de Queiroz; Haroldo C de Lima; Chaehee Lee; Tracey A Ruhlman; Robert K Jansen; Martin F Wojciechowski
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Comparative analyses of Mikania (Asteraceae: Eupatorieae) plastomes and impact of data partitioning and inference methods on phylogenetic relationships.

Authors:  Verônica A Thode; Caetano T Oliveira; Benoît Loeuille; Carolina M Siniscalchi; José R Pirani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.