| Literature DB >> 32628218 |
E Aytac-Kipergil, E J Alles, H C Pauw, J Karia, S Noimark, A E Desjardins.
Abstract
A versatile and scalable fabrication method for laser-generated focused ultrasound transducers is proposed. The method is based on stamping a coated negative mold onto polydimethylsiloxane, and it can be adapted to include different optical absorbers that are directly transferred or synthesized in situ. Transducers with a range of sizes down to 3 mm in diameter are presented, incorporating two carbonaceous (multiwalled carbon nanoparticles and candle soot nanoparticles) and one plasmonic (gold nanoparticles) optically absorbing component. The fabricated transducers operate at central frequencies in the vicinity of 10 MHz with bandwidths in the range of 15-20 MHz. A transducer with a diameter of 5 mm was found to generate a positive peak pressure greater than 35 MPa in the focal zone with a tight focal spot of 150 μm in lateral width. Ultrasound cavitation on the tip of an optical fiber was demonstrated in water for a transducer with a diameter as small as 3 mm.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32628218 PMCID: PMC7059213 DOI: 10.1364/OL.44.006005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Opt Lett ISSN: 0146-9592 Impact factor: 3.776
Fig. 1.Fabrication process shown schematically, with an optically absorbing layer created with (a) transfer and (b) in situ synthesis.
Fig. 2.(a) Ultrasound pressure time series generated by two transducers of each type at their foci [two transducers with CSNPs (left), MWCNTs (middle), and AuNPs (right)]. (b) Optical absorption spectra of the materials (c) Power spectra of the A-scans.
Fig. 3.Optical microscopy of transducer cross sections [radius of curvature (Rc), diameter (d)].
Fig. 4.(a) Maximum intensity of the transmitted acoustic field measured at 3 mm axially, and the propagated fields (; ). (b) Lateral and elevational extents of the acoustic beam and the normalized peak acoustic amplitude.
Fig. 5.(a) Concatenated A-scans displayed as images. [Transducer (CSNPs): and ; cavitation probabilities (CP)]. (b) A-scans with cavitation and without cavitation (). (c) Sample A-scan when the PE was 9.6 mJ.
Cavitation Probabilities (%) for Two CSNP-Based Transducers with Different Geometries
| Fluence | ||
| 23 | 1 | 0 |
| 27 | 20 | 0 |
| 31 | 98 | 0 |
| 39 | 100 | 11 |
| 46 | 100 | 76 |
| 54 | 100 | 100 |