| Literature DB >> 32628071 |
Carla E Scuderi1,2, Suzanne L Parker3, Margaret Jacks1, George John1, Brett McWhinney4, Jacobus Ungerer4,5, Andrew Mallett1,5,6, Jason A Roberts3,7,8,9,10, Helen Healy1,5, Christine E Staatz2.
Abstract
A survey of kidney transplant recipients receiving two innovative microsampling methods, dried blood spot and volumetric absorptive microsampling using patient reported methodology. A total of 39 adult transplant patients underwent venepuncture and finger prick-based blood draws on two occasions. They completed a survey of blood test understanding, tolerability, preferences and the burden associated with venepuncture compared with microsampling. A total of 85% of participants (n = 33) preferred finger prick-based sampling and 95% (n = 37) were interested in blood collection using self sampling by finger prick at home; 33% (n = 13) of participants experienced blood test anxiety. To quantify time burden of providing venous samples a total of 44% (n = 17) spent greater than 1 hour to travel and provide venous samples. This study observed a patient preference for microsampling for blood sampling as an alternative to venepuncture in the management of their kidney transplant.Entities:
Keywords: dried blood spot testing; health services; kidney transplant recipients; patient monitoring; survey; venepuncture; volumetric absorptive microsampling
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32628071 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2020-0057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioanalysis ISSN: 1757-6180 Impact factor: 2.681