OBJECTIVE: To report fixation stability changes in patients with different forms of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS), who have undergone a visual rehabilitation through biofeedback fixation training (BFT) with microperimetry (MP). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Patients 6 to 12 years-old with INS who performed BFT with MP. Initially 10 once-weekly followed by eight twice-weekly sessions of BFT during a minimum of 6 months period were performed. Visual acuity (VA) and MP fixation stability indices were analyzed, including displacement from fixation point (P1, P2) and percentage of retinal loci used during fixation attempt (BCEA 63% and 95%). Statistical analysis was conducted at baseline (BL), 10 weeks (W10) and 6 months (M6). RESULTS: Twelve patients (mean age 8.9 years.) with INS completed the whole training session. All patients showed significant improvement in the mean BCEA fixation area (deg2): For BCEA@95% BL was 78.0, 46.1 at W10, and 27.4 at M6 (p-value = 0.004). For BCEA@63% BL was 27.3, 15.4 in W10, and 9.17 at M6 (p = 0.01). The ANOVA test for the FS indices of P1 and P2, as well as for BCVA showed no significant difference when compared at the same intervals. CONCLUSION: Fixation stability (FS) indices of BCEAs (63% and 95%) improved at W10 and M6, while P1 and P2 showed significant improvement at W10 but not at M6, probably because BCEA involves a much larger area than P1 and P2. VA did not show significant improvement at any time point.
OBJECTIVE: To report fixation stability changes in patients with different forms of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS), who have undergone a visual rehabilitation through biofeedback fixation training (BFT) with microperimetry (MP). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Patients 6 to 12 years-old with INS who performed BFT with MP. Initially 10 once-weekly followed by eight twice-weekly sessions of BFT during a minimum of 6 months period were performed. Visual acuity (VA) and MP fixation stability indices were analyzed, including displacement from fixation point (P1, P2) and percentage of retinal loci used during fixation attempt (BCEA 63% and 95%). Statistical analysis was conducted at baseline (BL), 10 weeks (W10) and 6 months (M6). RESULTS: Twelve patients (mean age 8.9 years.) with INS completed the whole training session. All patients showed significant improvement in the mean BCEA fixation area (deg2): For BCEA@95% BL was 78.0, 46.1 at W10, and 27.4 at M6 (p-value = 0.004). For BCEA@63% BL was 27.3, 15.4 in W10, and 9.17 at M6 (p = 0.01). The ANOVA test for the FS indices of P1 and P2, as well as for BCVA showed no significant difference when compared at the same intervals. CONCLUSION: Fixation stability (FS) indices of BCEAs (63% and 95%) improved at W10 and M6, while P1 and P2 showed significant improvement at W10 but not at M6, probably because BCEA involves a much larger area than P1 and P2. VA did not show significant improvement at any time point.