Matthew Walker1, Iain Will2, Andrew Pratt3, Victor Chechik4, Paul Genever1, Daniel Ungar1. 1. Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K. 2. Department of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K. 3. Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K. 4. Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
Abstract
Nanoparticles could conceal bioactive proteins during therapeutic delivery, avoiding side effects. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) coated with a temperature-sensitive polymer were tested for protein release. We show that coated SPIONs can entrap test proteins and release them in a temperature-controlled manner in a biological system. Magnetically heating SPIONs triggered protein release at bulk solution temperatures below the polymer transition. The entrapped growth factor Wnt3a was inactive until magnetically triggered release, upon which it could increase mesenchymal stem cell proliferation. Once the polymer transition will be chemically adjusted above body temperature, this system could be used for targeted cell stimulation in model animals and humans.
Nanoparticles could conceal bioactive proteins during therapeutic delivery, avoiding side effects. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) coated with a temperature-sensitive polymer were tested for protein release. We show that coated SPIONs can entrap test proteins and release them in a temperature-controlled manner in a biological system. Magnetically heating SPIONs triggered protein release at bulk solution temperatures below the polymer transition. The entrapped growth factor Wnt3a was inactive until magnetically triggered release, upon which it could increase mesenchymal stem cell proliferation. Once the polymer transition will be chemically adjusted above body temperature, this system could be used for targeted cell stimulation in model animals and humans.
Developing controlled release
for bioactive substances has revolutionized many bioscience and medical
applications. For example, photoactivation of caged small-molecule
drugs has been instrumental for the detailed investigation of biological
processes and drug mechanisms.[1] Moreover,
photoactivatable drugs have found use in medical applications in which
the timing and location of drug action need careful control.[2] Examples of caged photoactivatable proteins have
been developed, but this requires chemical protein modifications and
is unavailable for many protein types and applications.[3] A generic controlled protein delivery system
would, however, be of great importance to a range of medical applications.
For example, the Wnt3a protein can stimulate osteoblast progenitor
pool proliferation and thereby promote bone formation to assist chronic
fracture healing.[4] Yet systemic Wnt3a administration
would raise safety concerns due to the role of canonical Wnt/β-catenin
signaling in tumor formation.[5] Hence, concealed
delivery and controlled release at the target will be needed for therapeutic
use of Wnt3a as well as many other potentially therapeutic proteins.
A more versatile alternative to photoactivation could be the magnetic
release of proteins caged into nanoparticles.Temperature-sensitive
polymers have in the past been used as scaffolds
to release bioactive compounds following implantation because of their
ability to undergo a fully reversible gel-to-liquid phase transition.[6] Phase-transition temperatures can be tuned between
30 and 45 °C by alteration of the monomer structure or by copolymerization.[7] Most commonly used is poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM), which has a lower critical solution
temperature (LCST) of 32 °C, above which the polymer expels water,
going from a swollen hydrated state to a shrunken hydrophobic state.[6] Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could,
for example, be released from a PNIPAM scaffold containing dispersed
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), which were used
to contract the gel by heating. Expelled VEGF was able to promote
human umbilical vein endothelial cell growth in a culture.[8]A more precise tool for the delivery of
bioactives are nanoparticles.
These can distribute throughout the body, while concealing bioactive
proteins during transit if fitted with a trigger mechanism to enable
controlled release at the target site.[9] Using a superparamagnetic core (e.g., SPIONs) enables controlled
release of bioactive compounds through magnetic heating, as shown
for VEGF.[8] SPIONs are made up of a magnetite/maghemite
core, generally 5–150 nm in size. They had previously been
developed for magnetic hyperthermia, imaging, and cell-tracking applications.[10,11] Moreover, SPIONs functionalized with thermally responsive polymers
have been demonstrated to release small-molecule drugs, such as doxorubicin,
upon magnetic-field-induced heating.[12] The
interactions between proteins and the PNIPAM shell surrounding the
SPIONs, however, are more complex, and reports are often contradictory.
Protein–PNIPAM interactions are likely to be strongly dependent
on the polymer density and morphology in the shell.[13] The release of a protein from a polymer-coated nanoparticle
is therefore more complex than simply squeezing out the protein in
the aqueous phase during hydrophobic collapse, as was observed for
VEGF in a SPION-doped hydrogel.[8] In many
cases, adsorption of proteins on PNIPAM substrates was observed above
the LCST, presumably driven by hydrophobic interactions that could
hinder protein release in the collapsed state.[14]In this study, we provide proof-of-concept for the
development
of SPIONs coated with a temperature-sensitive polymer, which could
entrap proteins below the polymer’s LCST of 32 °C, concealing
their bioactivity. Subsequent magnetic heating triggered collapse
of the polymer shell at bulk temperatures well below the LCST. Although
the collapsed polymer retained the cargo protein through hydrophobic
interactions, nonspecific competing proteins promoted the release
of cargo proteins, which, in turn, could perform bioactive functions,
such as enhancing stem cell proliferation, in a model system. We propose
from these results that SPIONs, once coated with polymers transitioning
above 42 °C and equipped with the means for targeting, could
provide an effective controlled in vivo delivery
system for bioactive proteins.Water-soluble thermally responsive
SPIONs with an average size
of 6.3 ± 0.9 nm, which can entrap and then release bioactive
proteins, were synthesized using a modified polyol process (Figure a,b).[15] The measured lattice spacing of 0.25 nm (Figures a and S1) is in good agreement with Fe3O4,[16] as were X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy measurements[17] (Figure S2). Vibrating-sample magnetometry confirmed
superparamagnetism (Figure S3),[18] while a specific absorption rate of 3.6 W/g
of Fe was determined in water by measuring a heating rate of 0.26
°C/min at 5 mg/mL SPION concentration upon exposure to a 0.67
T/108 kHz alternating magnetic field. Given their small size (<12
nm), Néel relaxation will dominate heating, while the contribution
from mechanical movement (Brownian relaxation) will be negligible.[19,20]
Figure 1
Characterization
of polymer-coated SPIONs. (a) High-resolution
transmission electron micrograph of nanoparticles and (b) the associated
size distribution, as determined from lower-magnification micrographs.
For calculation of the shown lattice plane distance, see also Figure S1. A Gaussian fit over the SPION size
distribution is shown.[19] (c) Schematic
of nitrodopamine-terminated PNIPAM and its attachment to the SPION
surface (the black sphere denotes a SPION). (d) TGA of 10 mg each
of uncoated and PNIPAM-coated SPION samples, which were heated under
nitrogen gas at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min between 0 and 600 °C.
(e) Photographs of 10 mg/mL PNIPAM-coated (C) and uncoated (U) SPIONs
incubated at the indicated temperatures for 30 min in plastic cuvettes.
For magnetic heating, the sample was exposed to a 108 kHz/0.67 T alternating
magnetic field before quick transfer to the cuvette for photographing.
Characterization
of polymer-coated SPIONs. (a) High-resolution
transmission electron micrograph of nanoparticles and (b) the associated
size distribution, as determined from lower-magnification micrographs.
For calculation of the shown lattice plane distance, see also Figure S1. A Gaussian fit over the SPION size
distribution is shown.[19] (c) Schematic
of nitrodopamine-terminated PNIPAM and its attachment to the SPION
surface (the black sphere denotes a SPION). (d) TGA of 10 mg each
of uncoated and PNIPAM-coated SPION samples, which were heated under
nitrogen gas at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min between 0 and 600 °C.
(e) Photographs of 10 mg/mL PNIPAM-coated (C) and uncoated (U) SPIONs
incubated at the indicated temperatures for 30 min in plastic cuvettes.
For magnetic heating, the sample was exposed to a 108 kHz/0.67 T alternating
magnetic field before quick transfer to the cuvette for photographing.A thermally responsive coating was achieved using
PNIPAM, which
has well-documented phase-transition properties, and has been widely
used in biological applications, including SPION coating.[8,12] Using an established atom-transfer-radical polymerization method,
PNIPAM polymers (Figure S4a) with a number-average
molecular weight (Mn) of 12.99 kDa (Figure S4b) were synthesized. The addition of
a terminal nitrocatechol group enabled SPION coating (Figures c, S5, and S6).[21] Thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA) showed a total mass loss of 50.3% when the organic polymer shell
was decomposed above 200 °C (Figure d). This equates to a grafting density of
0.26 chains/nm2 or 32 polymer chains per nanoparticle,
consistent with published data.[21] PNIPAM-coated
SPIONs remained readily dispersed in water below the polymer’s
LCST (Figure e, top).
Coated SPIONs precipitated due to aggregation when incubated above
the LCST or when heated with an alternating magnetic field (Figure e, bottom). We next
explored the potential application of these coated SPIONs to entrap
and release proteins.Entrapment and release of small-molecule
cargo from PNIPAM-coated
nanoparticles has been reported[7,12] but not protein entrapment
and release. Apotransferrin, a major serum glycoprotein, was used
as a model to assess protein entrapment and release. Apotransferrin
loading was achieved by first incubating coated SPIONs with the protein
above the polymer LCST (37 °C), followed by cooling below the
LCST to promote polymer expansion and protein entrapment in the polymer
shell (Figure a).
Shaking above the LCST prevented aggregation-mediated precipitation.
Most attempts to release proteins failed even above the LCST (Figure S9a), except treatment at high pH (data
not shown), indicating that proteins are entrapped but strongly associate
with the polymer itself.
Figure 2
Protein release from PNIPAM-coated SPIONs. (a)
Schematic diagram
of protein entrapment and release by PNIPAM-coated SPIONs. (1) 1 μg
of protein was mixed with 1 mg of coated SPIONs above the LCST. Polymer
chains were collapsed around the nanoparticle core, and agitation
was used to avoid particle aggregation. (2) Upon cooling below the
LCST, the polymer shell expanded, and some protein molecules were
engulfed by the shell; we call this the entrapping state of the coated
SPION. (3) Following removal of excess protein by washes in the presence
of competing nonspecific proteins, entrapped proteins could be discharged
by polymer collapse above the LCST, (4) which permitted nonspecific
competitor proteins to replace the weakly bound cargo proteins, thereby
releasing them. (b) (Left) Western blot analysis of the apotransferrin
collected from the supernatant, following incubation of apotransferrin-loaded
PNIPAM-coated nanoparticles (1 mg) in the presence of 10 mg/mL RNase
B (the nonspecific competitor) at pH 7.5. SPIONs were briefly collected
on one side of the tube with a permanent magnet when the solution
was sampled at the indicated time points. (Right) Densitometry of
the apotransferrin immunoblot signal used to quantify the amount of
apotransferrin released. Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3. 100% is the amount of protein used for entrapment,
given that the amount of protein detected in the washing steps prior
to release was negligible. (c) As in part b, but with or without application
of an alternating magnetic field (±MF as indicated) turned on
constantly for 10 min and then in pulses of 10 s on and 10 s off.
The bulk solution temperatures measured during magnetic heating using
an IR thermocouple probe are shown in parentheses above each time
point. The sample without magnetic heating was maintained at 21 °C.
Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3. Input
lanes are from the same blot images but had to be moved because these
were not in lanes adjacent to the release samples. Therefore, a divider
line was introduced. Note that the double band of apotransferrin represents
differently glycosylated forms whose ratios are batch-dependent.
Protein release from PNIPAM-coated SPIONs. (a)
Schematic diagram
of protein entrapment and release by PNIPAM-coated SPIONs. (1) 1 μg
of protein was mixed with 1 mg of coated SPIONs above the LCST. Polymer
chains were collapsed around the nanoparticle core, and agitation
was used to avoid particle aggregation. (2) Upon cooling below the
LCST, the polymer shell expanded, and some protein molecules were
engulfed by the shell; we call this the entrapping state of the coated
SPION. (3) Following removal of excess protein by washes in the presence
of competing nonspecific proteins, entrapped proteins could be discharged
by polymer collapse above the LCST, (4) which permitted nonspecific
competitor proteins to replace the weakly bound cargo proteins, thereby
releasing them. (b) (Left) Western blot analysis of the apotransferrin
collected from the supernatant, following incubation of apotransferrin-loaded
PNIPAM-coated nanoparticles (1 mg) in the presence of 10 mg/mL RNase
B (the nonspecific competitor) at pH 7.5. SPIONs were briefly collected
on one side of the tube with a permanent magnet when the solution
was sampled at the indicated time points. (Right) Densitometry of
the apotransferrin immunoblot signal used to quantify the amount of
apotransferrin released. Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3. 100% is the amount of protein used for entrapment,
given that the amount of protein detected in the washing steps prior
to release was negligible. (c) As in part b, but with or without application
of an alternating magnetic field (±MF as indicated) turned on
constantly for 10 min and then in pulses of 10 s on and 10 s off.
The bulk solution temperatures measured during magnetic heating using
an IR thermocouple probe are shown in parentheses above each time
point. The sample without magnetic heating was maintained at 21 °C.
Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3. Input
lanes are from the same blot images but had to be moved because these
were not in lanes adjacent to the release samples. Therefore, a divider
line was introduced. Note that the double band of apotransferrin represents
differently glycosylated forms whose ratios are batch-dependent.We found that the incubation of loaded SPIONs in
the presence of
a competing nonspecific protein (10 mg/mL RNase B) at the physiological
pH of 7.4 facilitated apotransferrin release, but only above the LCST
(Figure b). Thus,
in the presence of a competitor, cargo protein can be released in
a temperature-controlled manner under physiological conditions (Figure a). Note that this
competitor effect is not specific to RNase B, as shown for Wnt3a release.
This indicates that the presence of competing proteins in tissues
at physiological concentrations could enable release of the entrapped
proteins. We believe that this is the first report of the temperature-controlled
release of an entrapped protein from polymer-coated nanoparticles
under physiological conditions. We would argue that the interactions
between the protein and the hydrophilic polymer below its LCST are
dominated by hydrogen bonding. Steric entanglement of the protein
in the polymer chains likely contributes to entrapment (Figure a). In contrast, when the polymer
collapses into a hydrophobic state, steric entrapment ceases. At the
same time, the polymer–protein interactions shift from hydrogen
bonding to weaker hydrophobic interactions. The effect of competing
proteins suggests that the collapsed polymer shell allows for the
binding and release of proteins that associate with it via weak noncovalent
hydrophobic interactions.Having observed temperature-controlled
release of protein from
the coated SPIONs, we next assessed whether release could be triggered
by magnetic heating. Using a bespoke magnetic setup (Figures S7 and S8), apotransferrin-loaded SPIONs were incubated
in a 0.67 T/108 kHz alternating magnetic field, while monitoring the
sample temperature in real time and sampling for released protein.
Apotransferrin release was indeed detected when the SPION core was
magnetically heated from an ambient temperature of 21 °C (Figures c and S9b). Interestingly, released apotransferrin
was detected at bulk solution temperatures well below the LCST (Figure c). It is likely
that the thermal energy generated in the SPION core promotes localized
polymer collapse during transmission through the shell to the bulk
solution, permitting protein release. Importantly, cumulative release
of apotransferrin could be achieved without a significant temperature
increase in the bulk solution when magnetic heating was applied in
short pulses (Figure c). This is in agreement with previous reports that an alternating
magnetic field can heat the SPION core to a much greater extent than
the consequent heating of the bulk solution.[22] Cumulative release appears to be somewhat more efficient during
pulsed magnetic heating. Such release did, however, depend on recurrent
SPION heating because further release was halted when magnetic heating
was switched off (Figure S9c). This implies
that the PNIPAM transition on the particle surface is reversible and
the temperature gradient required for polymer collapse quickly dissipates.
During magnetic heating experiments, where the bulk solution temperature
remained below the LCST, we never observed particle aggregation. This
is in contrast to reversible aggregation during release experiments
using bulk heating (Figure b). In apotransferrin release experiments, 10–25% of
the model protein used for entrapment was recovered. We believe that
the remaining protein was still associated with the coated SPIONs
because we did not detect signs of protein degradation. To our best
knowledge, this is the first report of a magnetically triggered release
of proteins entrapped in polymer-coated nanoparticles. We turned to
testing how the developed coated SPIONs can shield and release bioactive
proteins.To test bioactive protein release in response to magnetic
heating,
we used the growth factor Wnt3a, together with an immortalized human
mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) line (Y201) engineered to produce enhanced
green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in response to Wnt signaling (Figure S11a,b).[23] Wnt3a
released upon magnetic triggering of the coated SPIONs can bind to
Wnt receptors on the MSC surface, initiating signaling resulting in
eGFP expression to be quantified by flow cytometry (Figure a). For compatibility with
the magnetic heating setup, we used custom-made tubes that permit
normal cell growth (Figure S10). MSCs treated
with an alternating magnetic field in the presence of Wnt3a-loaded
SPIONs, produced increased eGFP expression (Figures b and S11c). This
showed magnetic-heating-induced active Wnt3a release, while the bulk
solution remained under 24.5 °C, well below the polymer’s
LCST, and in a safe range to prevent the protein’s denaturation
(Figure S12). These experiments used competing
proteins present in fetal bovine serum, part of the growth medium
and mimicking a natural cellular environment.
Figure 3
Magnetically activated
nanoparticles can release bioactive Wnt3a.
(a) Experimental strategy for Wnt-reporter experiments. (b) Quantification
of Wnt3a released from 1 mg of SPIONs (loaded with 1 μg of Wnt3a),
calculated from scatter plots of the Wnt-reporter response measured
by flow cytometry (Figure S11c). Flow cytometry
was performed following overnight incubation of the Y201 Wnt-reporter
MSCs at 30 °C. Wnt3a release from SPIONs was triggered for 30
min in custom-built cell-growth vessels by magnetic treatment that
shifted the bulk solution temperature from 21.0 to 24.5 °C. SPIONs
were removed following magnetic treatment where indicated. The amount
of released Wnt3a was calculated from a calibration curve (Figure S11a,b). Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 4. *** indicates p < 0.001 compared
with “Overnight Wnt SPIONs” at 30 °C using Dunnet’s
multiple comparisons ANOVA. (c) Picogreen staining-based DNA quantification
of Y201 MSCs that were incubated for 7 days with protein-free coated
SPIONs at the indicated concentrations. Error bars denote standard
deviation, n = 3. The solid red bar shows the SPION
concentration used in Wnt3a release experiments. (d) Y201 MSCs treated
for 30 min with Wnt3a-loaded (Wnt SPIONs; 1 mg of SPIONs and 1 μg
of Wnt3a used in the loading reaction) or protein-free (SPIONs only;
1 mg) coated SPIONs in the presence of an alternating magnetic field
where indicated. At the end of the 30 min incubation, all SPIONs were
removed with a permanent magnet. Cells were then incubated for 5 days
at 37 °C, followed by picogreen staining-based DNA quantification.
The results for cells incubated with increasing concentrations of
Wnt3a only are shown for comparison. Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3. ** indicates p < 0.01 using Tukey’s
multiple comparisons ANOVA. Application of the alternating magnetic
field caused a bulk solution temperature shift of 20.9–24.1
°C. DNA quantification with picogreen staining was based on calibration
curves obtained using salmon sperm DNA.
Magnetically activated
nanoparticles can release bioactive Wnt3a.
(a) Experimental strategy for Wnt-reporter experiments. (b) Quantification
of Wnt3a released from 1 mg of SPIONs (loaded with 1 μg of Wnt3a),
calculated from scatter plots of the Wnt-reporter response measured
by flow cytometry (Figure S11c). Flow cytometry
was performed following overnight incubation of the Y201 Wnt-reporter
MSCs at 30 °C. Wnt3a release from SPIONs was triggered for 30
min in custom-built cell-growth vessels by magnetic treatment that
shifted the bulk solution temperature from 21.0 to 24.5 °C. SPIONs
were removed following magnetic treatment where indicated. The amount
of released Wnt3a was calculated from a calibration curve (Figure S11a,b). Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 4. *** indicates p < 0.001 compared
with “Overnight Wnt SPIONs” at 30 °C using Dunnet’s
multiple comparisons ANOVA. (c) Picogreen staining-based DNA quantification
of Y201 MSCs that were incubated for 7 days with protein-free coated
SPIONs at the indicated concentrations. Error bars denote standard
deviation, n = 3. The solid red bar shows the SPION
concentration used in Wnt3a release experiments. (d) Y201 MSCs treated
for 30 min with Wnt3a-loaded (Wnt SPIONs; 1 mg of SPIONs and 1 μg
of Wnt3a used in the loading reaction) or protein-free (SPIONs only;
1 mg) coated SPIONs in the presence of an alternating magnetic field
where indicated. At the end of the 30 min incubation, all SPIONs were
removed with a permanent magnet. Cells were then incubated for 5 days
at 37 °C, followed by picogreen staining-based DNA quantification.
The results for cells incubated with increasing concentrations of
Wnt3a only are shown for comparison. Error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3. ** indicates p < 0.01 using Tukey’s
multiple comparisons ANOVA. Application of the alternating magnetic
field caused a bulk solution temperature shift of 20.9–24.1
°C. DNA quantification with picogreen staining was based on calibration
curves obtained using salmon sperm DNA.In some of the above experiments, SPIONs carrying entrapped Wnt3a
were removed following the 30 min magnetic stimulation. In other experiments,
the Wnt3a-loaded particles remained in the culture medium following
the 30 min magnetic stimulation for the whole overnight incubation
prior to fluorescence analysis. The measured eGFP level was indistinguishable
between these conditions, suggesting that active Wnt3a release stopped
once magnetic stimulation was halted. Moreover, Wnt3a-loaded SPIONs
did not trigger signaling in the absence of magnetic heating, showing
that entrapped Wnt3a remained biologically inactive within the polymer
shell (Figure b).
These results show that PNIPAM-coated SPIONs can entrap a protein
factor to shield it from its biological target and can release this
same protein in a bioactive form upon heating by an alternating magnetic
field. This technology could thus find application with biopharmaceuticals
that have harmful side effects when acting away from an injury site.The above experiments demonstrated that Wnt3a released from coated
SPIONs was able to activate intracellular signaling and drive transactivation
of Wnt target genes. Next, we determined whether the strength of the
Wnt signal was sufficient to influence cell function, namely, proliferation,
a known biological response of MSCs to Wnt3a exposure (Figure S13).[24] For
these experiments, we used the multipotent clonal human MSC line (Y201),[25] from which the Wnt eGFP reporter line was generated.
In toxicity tests, we could show that SPIONs alone, at concentrations
4 times higher than those used in proliferation experiments, did not
affect the viability of Y201 MSCs (Figure c). When Wnt3a-loaded SPIONs were added to
Y201 MSCs and magnetically stimulated for 30 min before their removal,
the treated cells showed significantly (p < 0.01)
increased proliferation compared to untreated controls after 5 days
(Figure d). Thus,
the bioactive Wnt3a released from SPIONs by an alternating magnetic
field could influence complex cellular behavior. This shows that these
coated nanoparticle carriers are capable of influencing important
physiological cell responses by controlled release of a bioactive
protein factor through remote magnetic heating.SPIONs are a
versatile tool for noninvasive nanomedicine-based
therapeutic strategies because of the ease with which they penetrate
tissues[26] and can be triggered with an
alternating magnetic field.[27] Previous
applications of SPIONs have included magnetic hyperthermia[10] and the magnetically driven delivery of small-molecule
drugs.[7,12] Here, we show that SPIONs, when coated with
a thermally sensitive polymer shell, can be used to deliver protein
growth factors to target cells under physiological conditions in vitro. Exposure of SPIONs to an oscillating magnetic
field changed the mode of binding of entrapped proteins. Using two
very different model cargo proteins, we showed that, although these
proteins had remained bound to the SPIONs, they were released into
solution in the presence of nonspecifically binding competing proteins
that are naturally present in human tissues. Importantly, release
occurred following local heating of the SPION shell, while the bulk
solution temperature remains below the LCST. While the protein remained
inactive in the entrapped form, upon release, it could trigger the
proliferation of MSCs. This should enable the use of this technology
without the harmful side effects of hyperthermia. A primary goal for
ongoing and future work is to increase the polymer LCST using established
methodology.[7] Increasing the LCST will
be an essential next step to make the coated SPION device usable in
animal model studies and ultimately for human use.