Literature DB >> 32626409

Safety and efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 as a silage additive for all animal species.

Vasileios Bampidis, Giovanna Azimonti, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Henrik Christensen, Birgit Dusemund, Maryline Kouba, Mojca Kos Durjava, Marta López-Alonso, Secundino López Puente, Francesca Marcon, Alena Pechová, Mariana Petkova, Fernando Ramos, Yolanda Sanz, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Ruud Woutersen, Boet Glandorf, Lieve Herman, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Maria Saarela, Montserrat Anguita, Jaume Galobart, Orsolya Holczknecht, Paola Manini, Fabiola Pizzo, Jordi Tárres-Call, Elisa Pettenati, Baltasar Mayo.   

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 as a silage additive for all animal species. Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 is presumed safe for the target species, consumers of products from animals fed treated silage and the environment. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the potential of the additive to be a skin/eye irritant or skin sensitiser. Given the proteinaceous nature of the active agent, the additive should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of appropriate data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 as a silage additive.
© 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus licheniformis; QPS; efficacy; safety; silage additive; technological additives

Year:  2019        PMID: 32626409      PMCID: PMC7009297          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


Introduction

Background and Terms of Reference

Regulation (EC) No 1831/20031 establishes the rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition. In particular, Article 4(1) of that Regulation lays down that any person seeking authorisation for a feed additive or for a new use of a feed additive shall submit an application in accordance with Article 7. The European Commission received a request from EnviroSystems (UK) Ltd2 for authorisation of the product Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 (Optimize), when used as a feed additive for all animal species (category: technological additives; functional group: silage additives). According to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the Commission forwarded the application to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as an application under Article 4(1) (authorisation of a feed additive or new use of a feed additive). The particulars and documents in support of the application were considered valid by EFSA as of 7 December 2018. According to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, EFSA, after verifying the particulars and documents submitted by the applicant, shall undertake an assessment in order to determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. EFSA shall deliver an opinion on the safety for the target animals, consumer, user and the environment and on the efficacy of the product Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 (Optimize), when used under the proposed conditions of use (see Section 3.1.4).

Additional information

The additive is a preparation containing viable cells of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457. It has not been previously authorised as a feed additive in the European Union.

Data and methodologies

Data

The present assessment is based on data submitted by the applicant in the form of a technical dossier3 in support of the authorisation request for the use of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 as a feed additive. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has verified the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) report as it relates to the methods used for the control of the active agent in animal feed. The Executive Summary of the EURL report can be found in Annex A.4

Methodologies

The approach followed by the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) to assess the safety and the efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 is in line with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 429/20085 and the relevant guidance documents: Guidance on technological additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a), Technical Guidance for assessing the safety of feed additives for the environment (EFSA, 2008), Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012b), Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017a), Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2018), Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017b) and Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017c).

Assessment

The additive is a preparation of spores of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 324576 intended for use as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species.

Characterisation

Characterisation of the active agent

The Bacillus licheniformis strain ■■■■■■■■■■ It is deposited in the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen with the accession number DSM 32457.8 It has not been genetically modified. Taxonomical identification of the strain as B. licheniformis was established ■■■■■ Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 was tested for antibiotic susceptibility using broth microdilution techniques. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ it is not considered to be a hazard. The toxigenic potential of B. licheniformis DSM 32457 was investigated in a cytotoxicity assay with Vero cells ■■■■■ according to Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2018).10 ■■■■■ No cytotoxic effects were detected.

Characterisation of the product

■■■■■ The resulting product, B. licheniformis active powder is standardised to ■■■■■ colony‐forming units (CFU)/g. The B. licheniformis active powder ■■■■■ is then blended with ■■■■■ to obtain the product under assessment with a minimum specified content of ■■■■■ CFU/g. Analysis of five batches of the final product showed a mean value of ■■■■■11 The same five batches were analysed for microbial contamination.11 Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, yeasts and filamentous fungi and Bacillus cereus were not detected.12 Salmonella was absent in 25 g.13 Aflatoxins and heavy metals were tested in three batches.14 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Three batches of the additive were examined for dusting potential (Stauber–Heubach method) and for particle size distribution by laser diffraction.17 The dusting potential ranged between 1.75 and 2.41 g/m3. In average, 71.4% (v/v) of the additive consists of particles below 100 μm, 43.8% below 50 μm and 5.0% below 10 μm.

Stability

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

Conditions of use

The additive is intended for use with easy to ensile forages for all animal species at a proposed minimum concentration of 5 × 107 CFU/kg forage and a maximum concentration of 1.2 × 108 CFU/kg forage.7 The applicant recommends applying it as an aqueous suspension.

Safety

Safety for the target species, consumers and environment

The species B. licheniformis is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment (EFSA, 2007; EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2017). This approach requires the identity of the strain to be conclusively established and evidence that the strain does not show acquired resistance to antibiotics of human and veterinary importance and lack of toxigenic potential. The FEEDAP Panel noted that the identity of the strain was established as B. licheniformis. Evidence was provided on the lack of toxigenic potential of the strain and on the absence of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. Consequently, Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 is presumed safe for the target species, consumers of products from animals fed treated silage and the environment.

Safety for the user

No specific data on skin/eye irritation or skin sensitisation were provided for the additive under application. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn on the skin/eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. Given the proteinaceous nature of the active agent, the additive should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser.

Efficacy

The applicant provided data on four laboratory experiments. The applicant claimed that the experiments were performed with easy to ensile forages, as specified by Regulation (EC) No 429/2008.19 However, this claim was not supported by the analysis of water‐soluble carbohydrates in two of the experiments (Guidance on technological additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a)). The FEEDAP Panel noted that endpoints measured at the end of the 90‐day experiments were limited to total volatile fatty acids (VFA) and sugars in all four experiments, and dry matter loss in two of them. No measurements of pH, ammonia N, lactic acid, VFA profile were provided for any of the studies. In addition, in one of the studies, the temperature of the silage was measured after exposure to air, but without a comparison with an untreated control. Taking into account the above, the FEEDAP Panel cannot consider any of these studies for the assessment. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn on the efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457.

Conclusions

Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 is presumed safe for the target species, consumers of products from animals fed treated silage and the environment. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the potential of the additive to be a skin/eye irritant or skin sensitiser. Given the proteinaceous nature of the active agent, the additive should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of appropriate data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the efficacy of Bacillus licheniformis DSM 32457 as a silage additive.

Documentation provided to EFSA/Chronology

Abbreviations

colony‐forming unit Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen European Union Reference Laboratory Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed limit of detection Qualified Presumption of Safety volatile fatty acids In the current application, authorisation is sought under Article 4(1) for a preparation of Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457 (Optimize) under the category/functional group 1(k) ‘technological additives’/'silage additives’, according to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Specifically, authorisation is sought for the use of the feed additive in silage for all animal species. According to the Applicant, the feed additive contains as active substance viable spores of the non‐genetically modified strain Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457. The feed additive is to be marketed as a powder preparation containing a minimum Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457 content of 2.5 × 1010 colony‐forming unit (CFU)/g. The feed additive is intended to be added, after its reconstitution in water, to silage at a minimum dose of 5 × 107 CFU/kg of silage. For the identification of Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457, the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) recommends for official control Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), a generally recognised methodology for genetic identification of bacterial strains. For the enumeration of Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457 in the feed additive, the Applicant submitted the ring‐trial validated spread plate CEN method EN 15784. Based on the performance characteristics available, the EURL recommends this method for official control. The Applicant did not provide any experimental method or data for the quantification of Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457 in silage. Since the unambiguous determination of the content of Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457 initially added to silage is not achievable by analysis, the EURL cannot evaluate nor recommend any method for official control to quantify the active substance in silage. Further testing or validation of the methods to be performed through the consortium of National Reference Laboratories as specified by Article 10 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005, as last amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/1761) is not considered necessary.
DateEvent
23/8/2018Dossier received by EFSA. Optimize, a preparation of Bacillus licheniformis ENV01/DSM 32457 and maltodextrin. Submitted by EnviroSystems (UK) Ltd
7/9/2018Reception mandate from the European Commission
7/12/2018Application validated by EFSA – Start of the scientific assessment
6/2/2019Request of supplementary information to the applicant in line with Article 8(1)(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 – Scientific assessment suspended. Issues: Characterisation, Conditions of use and Efficacy
27/3/2019Reception of supplementary information from the applicant – Scientific assessment re‐started
7/3/2019Comments received from Member States
25/2/2019Reception of the Evaluation report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives
3/7/2019Opinion adopted by the FEEDAP Panel. End of the Scientific assessment
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Different Concentrations of Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus licheniformis on Silage Quality, In Vitro Fermentation and Microbial Community of Hybrid Pennisetum.

Authors:  Yanchen Zhu; Haoming Xiong; Zhiying Wen; Hanchen Tian; Yiye Chen; Longfei Wu; Yongqing Guo; Baoli Sun
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  Potential application of the probiotic Bacillus licheniformis as an adjuvant in the treatment of diseases in humans and animals: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hugo Ramirez-Olea; Bernardo Reyes-Ballesteros; Rocio Alejandra Chavez-Santoscoy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.