Literature DB >> 32626374

Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals.

Antonio Hernández-Jerez, Paulien Adriaanse, Annette Aldrich, Philippe Berny, Tamara Coja, Sabine Duquesne, Anne Louise Gimsing, Marinovich Marina, Maurice Millet, Olavi Pelkonen, Silvia Pieper, Aaldrik Tiktak, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Anneli Widenfalk, Gerrit Wolterink, Danilo Russo, Franz Streissl, Christopher Topping.   

Abstract

Bats are an important group of mammals, frequently foraging in farmland and potentially exposed to pesticides. This statement considers whether the current risk assessment performed for birds and ground dwelling mammals exposed to pesticides is also protective of bats. Three main issues were addressed. Firstly, whether bats are toxicologically more or less sensitive than the most sensitive birds and mammals. Secondly, whether oral exposure of bats to pesticides is greater or lower than in ground dwelling mammals and birds. Thirdly, whether there are other important exposure routes relevant to bats. A large variation in toxicological sensitivity and no relationship between sensitivity of bats and bird or mammal test-species to pesticides could be found. In addition, bats have unique traits, such as echolocation and torpor which can be adversely affected by exposure to pesticides and which are not covered by the endpoints currently selected for wild mammal risk assessment. The current exposure assessment methodology was used for oral exposure and adapted to bats using bat-specific parameters. For oral exposure, it was concluded that for most standard risk assessment scenarios the current approach did not cover exposure of bats to pesticide residues in food. Calculations of potential dermal exposure for bats foraging during spraying operations suggest that this may be a very important exposure route. Dermal routes of exposure should be combined with inhalation and oral exposure. Based on the evidence compiled, the Panel concludes that bats are not adequately covered by the current risk assessment approach, and that there is a need to develop a bat-specific risk assessment scheme. In general, there was scarcity of data to assess the risks for bat exposed to pesticides. Recommendations for research are made, including identification of alternatives to laboratory testing of bats to assess toxicological effects.
© 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pesticides; bats; chiroptera; effects; exposure; risk assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 32626374      PMCID: PMC7009170          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  4 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Risks to Bats from Plant Protection Products: A Review of the Recent European Food Safety Authority Statement Regarding Toxicity and Exposure Routes.

Authors:  A C Brooks; J Nopper; A Weyers; H Crosland; M Foudoulakis; S Haaf; M Hackett; A Lawrence
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.218

2.  Development of an LC-MS/MS Method for Non-Invasive Biomonitoring of Neonicotinoid and Systemic Herbicide Pesticide Residues in Bat Hair.

Authors:  Sarah E Hooper; Sybill K Amelon; Chung-Ho Lin
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-02-05

3.  Acute toxicity and metabolism of pesticides in birds.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Katagi; Takuo Fujisawa
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.529

4.  Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher-tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations.

Authors:  Valerio Orioli; Alessandra Caffi; Flavio Marchetto; Olivia Dondina; Luciano Bani
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.084

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.