Safety and efficacy of l-threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■ for all animal species.

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■ when used as a nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species and categories. The product under assessment is l-threonine produced by fermentation with a ■■■■■ strain of C. glutamicum (■■■■■). l-Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is considered safe for the target species when supplemented in appropriate amounts to the diet. The FEEDAP Panel has concerns on the safety of the simultaneous oral administration of l-threonine via water for drinking and feed. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the consumer. The additive is not a skin or eye irritant and is not a skin sensitiser. Although the workers can be exposed by inhalation, the results of an acute inhalation study showed that risk of adverse effects by inhalation is low. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the environment. The product under assessment is considered an efficacious source of the amino acid l-threonine for all animal species. For l-threonine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it requires protection against degradation in the rumen.

Introduction

Background and Terms of Reference

Regulation (EC) No 1831/20031 establishes the rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition. In particular, Article 4(1) of that Regulation lays down that any person seeking authorisation for a feed additive or for a new use of a feed additive shall submit an application in accordance with Article 7.

The European Commission received a request from CJ Europe GmbH2 for authorisation of the product l‐threonine, feed grade, produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■ when used as a feed additive for all animal species (category: nutritional additives; functional group: amino acids, their salts and analogues).

According to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the Commission forwarded the application to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as an application under Article 4(1) (authorisation of a feed additive or new use of a feed additive). The particulars and documents in support of the application were considered valid by EFSA as of 20 April 2018.

According to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, EFSA, after verifying the particulars and documents submitted by the applicant, shall undertake an assessment in order to determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. EFSA shall deliver an opinion on the safety for the target animals, consumer, user and the environment and on the efficacy of the product l‐threonine produced by fermentation with C. glutamicum ■■■■■ when used as a nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species under the proposed conditions of use (see Section 3.1.4).

Additional information

l‐Threonine produced by eight different strains of Escherichia coli (minimum content of 98% on dry matter basis) is currently authorised as a nutritional feed additive for use in all animal species.3 The product under assessment, l‐threonine produced by the ■■■■■ strain of C. glutamicum ■■■■■, has not been previously authorised as feed additive in the European Union (EU).

l‐Threonine is authorised for use in food,4 cosmetics5 and as a veterinary medicinal product.6 , 7

l‐Threonine is described in a monograph of the European Pharmacopoeia (MG 01/2008:1049) (Ph. Eur., 2016).

The Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued ten opinions on the safety and efficacy of l‐threonine produced by genetically modified strains of E. coli (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013, 2014a,b,c,d, 2015a,b, 2016a,b, 2017a, 2018a).

The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives evaluated l‐threonine as a food flavouring agent (JECFA; WHO, 2012).

Data and methodologies

Data

The present assessment is based on data submitted by the applicant in the form of a technical dossier8 in support of the authorisation request for the use l‐threonine produced by fermentation with C. glutamicum ■■■■■ as a feed additive.

The FEEDAP Panel used the data provided by the applicant together with data from other sources, such as previous risk assessments by EFSA or other expert bodies, and experts’ knowledge to deliver the present output.

EFSA has verified the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) report as it relates to the methods used for the control of the l‐threonine produced by fermentation with C. glutamicum ■■■■■ in animal feed. The Executive Summary of the EURL report can be found in Annex A.9

Methodologies

The approach followed by the FEEDAP Panel to assess the safety and the efficacy of l‐threonine produced by fermentation with C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is in line with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 429/200810 and the relevant guidance documents: Guidance on nutritional additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a), Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017b), Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017c), Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017d), Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012b), Technical Guidance for assessing the safety of feed additives for the environment (EFSA, 2008) and Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2018b).

Assessment

The subject of the present assessment is l‐threonine (minimum 98.5%) produced by fermentation with a ■■■■■ strain of C. glutamicum (■■■■■). It is intended to be used as a nutritional additive (functional group amino acids, their salts and analogues) to feed and water for drinking in all animal species and categories.

Under European Union (EU) conditions, l‐threonine seems to be the second most limiting amino acid, after l‐lysine, in pigs and the third most limiting, after the sulphur amino acids and l‐lysine, in poultry.

Characterisation

Characterisation of the production organism

The additive under assessment is produced by a ■■■■■ strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum, ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■

C. glutamicum is considered suitable for qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach when used for production purposes (EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2019) on condition that the production strain is free from possible antibiotic resistance.

The susceptibility of the strain was tested against the list of antibiotics proposed for Corynebacterium in the technical Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2018a,b). ■■■■■■■■■■ C. glutamicum ■■■■■ therefore fulfils all criteria for qualification as QPS.

Manufacturing process

■■■■■14

■■■■■■■■■■

Characterisation of the additive

l‐Threonine (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name: (2S,3R)‐2‐amino‐3‐ hydroxybutanoic acid; synonyms: 2‐amino‐3‐hydroxybutyric acid, α‐amino‐β‐hydroxybutyric acid), a compound identified with the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) No 72‐19‐5 and the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances (EINECS) No 200‐774‐1, has a molecular weight of 119.12 Da. The molecular formula of l‐threonine is C4H9NO3. The structural formula is given in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structural formula of l‐threonine

The additive contains by specification ≥ 98.5% l‐threonine ‘as is’ (≥ 99.0% l‐threonine on a dry matter basis), ≤ 0.5% moisture and ≤ 0.1% ash.16 The analysis of five batches of the additive showed an average of threonine of 99.2% ‘as is’ (range 99.1−99.2%).17 The loss on drying was 0.14% (range 0.13–0.16%) and the ash 0.03% (range 0.02–0.03%). Other amino acids (lysine, serine, glutamic acid, isoleucine and valine) represented 0.06% and sulfate was 0.01% (in all batches).18 The amount of unidentified material was lower than 1% on a dry matter basis.

The specific optical rotation was measured in three batches of the final product and the average was −28.4° (range −28.3 to −28.5°),19 which is within the range established for l‐threonine in the European Pharmacopoeia (−29.0 to −27.6°) and demonstrates the identity of the l‐enantiomer.

Impurities

Three batches were analysed for heavy metals (cadmium, mercury and lead) and arsenic and in all cases the levels were found under the limit of detection (LOD).20 None of these amounts were considered of concern.

The microbiological quality of three batches of the product was tested by counting total bacterial count (< 103 colony forming units (CFU)/g) Salmonella spp. (negative in 25 g), E. coli (negative), coliform bacteria (negative) and filamentous fungi and yeasts (< 5 x 102 CFU/g).21 Regarding mycotoxins, ochratoxin A; aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2; zearalenone; fumonisin B1 and B2; and deoxynivalenol were analysed in three batches of the additive. All values were below the LOD and are of no concern.22 Pesticides (358 species) were analysed in three batches and the values were below the LOD.23

Dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF), polychlorinated dibenzo(p)dioxins (PCDD)) and dioxin‐like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL‐PCBs) were measured in three batches of the final product.24 PCDD/F were < 0.05 μg WHO‐TEQ/kg. Dioxin‐like PCBs were < 0.16 μg WHO‐TEQ/kg.

The absence of viable cells in the final product was tested: ■■■■■■■■■■

Physical characteristics

The additive is an off‐white free flowing powder. It has a pH of 4.5–7 in 10% water solution, a bulk density of 700–900 kg/m3. Its melting point is 256°C and its solubility in water at 20°C is 97.6 g/L.26

The particle size distribution of the final product (three batches) was analysed by sieving.27 The fractions of particles having a diameter < 125, and < 75 μm ranged 36–42, and 10–18% (v/w), respectively. The applicant demonstrated that the particle size distribution was very similar to the l‐threonine produced by strain C. glutamicum ■■■■■ (three batches analysed by sieving showed fractions of particles having a diameter < 125, and < 75 μm ranged 37–47, and 12–16% (v/w), respectively).

No information on the dusting potential of the product under assessment was provided.

Stability and homogeneity

No information on the shelf life, stability (in premixtures and feedingstuffs) and capacity of the additive to distribute homogeneously in feed of the additive under assessment was provided. The applicant provided information on the shelf life, stability in premixtures and feedingstuffs and on the capacity of l‐threonine to distribute homogeneously in feed performed with an l‐threonine originating from a different strain (C. glutamicum ■■■■■).28 As the production process is the same and the product characteristics are very similar, the FEEDAP Panel considers that the results of those studies can be applicable to the product under assessment.

A previous study on the shelf life of l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ when stored in sealed brown glass at 25°C and 40°C for 6 months showed no losses.

l‐Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ (three batches) was stabile in a premixture containing 4% choline chloride when supplemented at 5% and stored in aluminium vacuum bags at 25°C for 6 months.

l‐Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ (three batches) was stabile in a complete feed for chicken for fattening when supplemented via premixture at 0.4%. The basal diet consisted of maize, soybean meal and wheat. The samples were stored at 25°C in aluminium vacuum bags for 3 months. Losses ranged from 0% to 5%.29

l‐Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ (three batches) was stabile in water for drinking when supplemented at 0.05%. Samples were stored in aluminium vacuum bags at 25 and 40°C for 48 h.

The capacity of the l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ to distribute homogeneously in feed was studied in the premixture described above, in the mash feed described above and in a different pelleted feed. The pelleted feed was supplemented with 0.2% l‐threonine and conditioned at 72°C, pelleted at 82°C and dried at 60–65°C. The coefficients of variation were 3%, 2% and 4%, respectively.

Physico‐chemical incompatibilities

No physico‐chemical incompatibilities in feed are expected with other additives, medicinal products or feed materials.

Conditions of use

It is proposed that l‐threonine will be used in feeds to achieve an adequate amino acid profile and to meet the l‐threonine requirements for all animal species. It can be added directly to feedingstuffs or complementary feedingstuffs, or via a premixture. It is also proposed to use the additive in water for drinking. No inclusion levels have been proposed, as the requirements, in quantitative terms, depend on the species, the physiological state of the animal, the performance level, the environmental conditions and the amino acid composition of the unsupplemented diet.30

Safety

Safety for the target species

Concerns from the use of the additive may arise from residues of the fermentation process/production strain remaining in the final product. The additive is highly purified (> 99%), is produced by fermentation using a strain that belongs to a species and that qualifies for the QPS approach for safety assessment. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the target species provided that it is supplemented in appropriate amounts to the diets. Due to the risk of nutritional imbalances and hygienic reasons associated to the use of amino acids via water for drinking (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2010), the FEEDAP Panel has concerns on the safety of the simultaneous oral administration of threonine‐containing additives via feed and water for drinking.

Safety for the consumer

The amino acid l‐threonine, supplemented to feed, will be incorporated into proteins of tissues and/or products of animal origin and any of their potential excess will be metabolised and excreted as urea/uric acid and carbon dioxide. Therefore, the composition of tissues and products of animal origin will not be affected by the use of l‐threonine in animal nutrition.

The product under assessment is produced by fermentation using a C. glutamicum strain which fulfils the qualifications for the QPS approach to safety assessment. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that the use of l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ in animal nutrition is safe for the consumer.

Safety for the user

No studies to support the safety of the additive for the user were performed using the additive under assessment as test item. The applicant submitted an acute inhalation toxicity study, an in vitro skin irritation test, and eye irritation/corrosion test and a skin sensitisation test performed using l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ as test item (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2019).31 As the production process and the product characteristics are very similar, the FEEDAP Panel considers that the conclusions of these studies are applicable to the product under assessment.

Conclusions on safety for the user

The additive is not a skin or eye irritant and is not a skin sensitiser. Although the workers can be exposed by inhalation, the results of an acute inhalation study showed that risk of adverse effects by inhalation is low.

Safety for the environment

The amino acid l‐threonine is a physiological and natural component of the proteins of living organisms. When consumed, it will be absorbed, and the non‐absorbed fraction will be incorporated into the intestinal microbial mass and excreted as such. The absorbed l‐threonine will be incorporated into body protein or excreted as urea/uric acid and as carbon dioxide.

l‐Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the environment.

Efficacy

Efficacy studies are not required for amino acids which naturally occur in the proteins of plants and animals. The nutritional role of l‐threonine is well established in the scientific literature. Since most of the studies have been performed with supplemental l‐threonine, the product l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is regarded as an effective source of the amino acid l‐threonine.

The efficacy of l‐threonine for both non‐ruminant and ruminant species was described in previous opinions (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013, 2014a). Supplemental l‐threonine is degraded by ruminal microbiota if not given in a protected form.

Post‐market monitoring

The FEEDAP Panel considers that there is no need for specific requirements for a post‐market monitoring plan other than those established in the Feed Hygiene Regulation32 and Good Manufacturing Practice.

Conclusions

l‐Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is considered safe for the target species when supplemented in appropriate amounts to the diet. The FEEDAP Panel has concerns on the safety of the simultaneous oral administration of l‐threonine via feed and water for drinking.

The use of l‐threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ in animal nutrition is safe for the consumer.

The additive is not a skin or eye irritant and is not a skin sensitiser. Although the workers can be exposed by inhalation, the results of an acute inhalation study showed that risk of adverse effects by inhalation is low.

l‐Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the environment.

The product l‐threonine is regarded as an effective source of the amino acid l‐threonine for all non‐ruminant species. For the supplemental l‐threonine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non‐ruminant species, it requires protection against degradation in the rumen.

Documentation provided to EFSA

Feed grade l‐threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■. June 2018. Submitted by CJ Europe GmbH.

Feed grade l‐threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■. Supplementary information. November 2018. Submitted by CJ Europe GmbH.

Evaluation report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives on the Methods of Analysis for l‐threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■.

Comments from Member States.

Chronology

Abbreviations

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards

Chemical Abstracts Service

colony forming unit

dioxin‐like polychlorinated biphenyls

European Inventory of Existing Commercial chemical Substances

European Union Reference Laboratory

Food Chemical Codex

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed

ion exchange chromatography

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives

■■■■■

limit of detection

polychlorinated dibenzodioxin

polychlorinated dibenzofuran

polymerase chain reaction

qualified presumption of safety

Toxic equivalent

visible or fluorescence detection

World Health Organization

In the current application, authorisation is sought under Article 4(1) for l‐threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■, under the category/functional group 3(c) ‘nutritional additives’/’amino acids, their salts and analogues’, according to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Authorisation is sought for all animal species.

According to the Applicant, the product is an off‐white powder with a minimum purity of 98.5%.

l‐Threonine is intended to be mixed either in premixtures or added directly to feedingstuffs or in addition to water. However, the Applicant did not propose a minimum or maximum l‐threonine content in feedingstuffs.

For the quantification of l‐threonine in the feed additive, premixtures and feedingstuffs, the Applicant submitted the ring‐trial validated Community method (Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009) based on ion exchange chromatography coupled with photometric detection (IEC‐VIS). This method, designed only for the analysis of premixtures and feedingstuffs, does not distinguish between the salts and the amino acid enantiomers. The following performance characteristics were reported for the quantification of total threonine: a relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranging from 1.9% to 2.7%, and a relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) ranging from 3.8% to 5.2%.

For the quantification of l‐threonine in the feed additive, the EURL identified the ring‐trial validated method EN ISO 17180:2013 based on IEC coupled with post‐column derivatisation and visible or fluorescence detection (IEC‐VIS/FLD). The following performance characteristics are reported: a RSDr ranging from 0.7% to 1.4%; and a RSDR ranging from 1.9% to 2.3%. In addition, the EURL identified the ‘l‐threonine monograph’ of the Food Chemical Codex (FCC) for the identification of l‐threonine in the feed additive.

Within the dossier, the Applicant presented experimental data obtained analysing threonine in water with the AOAC official method 999.13 based on IEC‐VIS/FLD. The results presented are considered sufficient to demonstrate the suitability of the procedure for the analysis of the amino acid in water. Hence, the EURL recommends for official control this method to quantify threonine in water.

In the frame of this authorisation the EURL recommends for official control (i) the ‘l‐threonine monograph’ of the FCC based on infrared absorption for the identification of l‐threonine in the feed additive; (ii) the ring‐trial validated method EN ISO 17180:2013 based on IEC‐VIS/FLD to quantify free threonine in the feed additive and premixtures (containing more than 10% threonine); (iii) the Community method based on IEC‐VIS for the quantification of threonine in premixtures and feedingstuffs; and (iv) the analytical method described by AOAC (999.13) based on IEC‐VIS/FLD to quantify threonine in water.

Further testing or validation of the methods to be performed through the consortium of National Reference Laboratories as specified by Article 10 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005), as last amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/1761) is not considered necessary.

Date	Event
5/6/2018	Dossier received by EFSA
19/6/2018	Reception mandate from the European Commission
31/7/2018	Application validated by EFSA – Start of the scientific assessment
9/10/2010	Request of supplementary information to the applicant in line with Article 8(1)(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 – Scientific assessment suspended. Issues: characterisation of the additive and manufacturing process
31/10/2018	Comments received from Member States
15/11/2018	Reception of supplementary information from the applicant ‐ Scientific assessment re‐started
30/11/2018	Reception of the Evaluation report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives
22/1/2019	Opinion adopted by the FEEDAP Panel. End of the Scientific assessment