| Literature DB >> 32626002 |
Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Stefania Barmaz, Alba Brancato, Daniela Brocca, Laszlo Bura, Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Arianna Chiusolo, Consuelo Civitella, Daniele Court Marques, Federica Crivellente, Lucie Ctverackova, Chloe De Lentdecker, Mark Egsmose, Zoltan Erdos, Gabriella Fait, Lucien Ferreira, Marina Goumenou, Luna Greco, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Samira Jarrah, Dimitra Kardassi, Renata Leuschner, Christopher Lythgo, Jose Oriol Magrans, Paula Medina, Desire Mineo, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Ragnor Pedersen, Hermine Reich, Christina Riemenschneider, Angela Sacchi, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Alois Stanek, Franz Streissl, Juergen Sturma, Csaba Szentes, Jose Tarazona, Andrea Terron, Anne Theobald, Benedicte Vagenende, Joanke Van Dijk, Laura Villamar-Bouza.
Abstract
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance BAS 750 F (mefentrifluconazole) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use(s) of BAS 750 F (mefentrifluconazole) as a fungicide on cereals. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.Entities:
Keywords: BAS 750 F (mefentrifluconazole); fungicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment
Year: 2018 PMID： 32626002 PMCID： PMC7009668 DOI： 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EFSA J ISSN： 1831-4732