Literature DB >> 32625980

African swine fever in wild boar.

Simon More, Miguel Angel Miranda, Dominique Bicout, Anette Bøtner, Andrew Butterworth, Paolo Calistri, Sandra Edwards, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Margaret Good, Virginie Michel, Mohan Raj, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Liisa Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Jan Arend Stegeman, Antonio Velarde, Preben Willeberg, Christoph Winckler, Klaus Depner, Vittorio Guberti, Marius Masiulis, Edvins Olsevskis, Petr Satran, Mihaela Spiridon, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Arvo Vilrop, Grzegorz Wozniakowski, Andrea Bau, Alessandro Broglia, José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Sofie Dhollander, Andrey Gogin, Irene Muñoz Gajardo, Frank Verdonck, Laura Amato, Christian Gortázar Schmidt.   

Abstract

The European Commission requested EFSA to compare the reliability of wild boar density estimates across the EU and to provide guidance to improve data collection methods. Currently, the only EU-wide available data are hunting data. Their collection methods should be harmonised to be comparable and to improve predictive models for wild boar density. These models could be validated by more precise density data, collected at local level e.g. by camera trapping. Based on practical and theoretical considerations, it is currently not possible to establish wild boar density thresholds that do not allow sustaining African swine fever (ASF). There are many drivers determining if ASF can be sustained or not, including heterogeneous population structures and human-mediated spread and there are still unknowns on the importance of different transmission modes in the epidemiology. Based on extensive literature reviews and observations from affected Member States, the efficacy of different wild boar population reduction and separation methods is evaluated. Different wild boar management strategies at different stages of the epidemic are suggested. Preventive measures to reduce and stabilise wild boar density, before ASF introduction, will be beneficial both in reducing the probability of exposure of the population to ASF and the efforts needed for potential emergency actions (i.e. less carcass removal) if an ASF incursion were to occur. Passive surveillance is the most effective and efficient method of surveillance for early detection of ASF in free areas. Following focal ASF introduction, the wild boar populations should be kept undisturbed for a short period (e.g. hunting ban on all species, leave crops unharvested to provide food and shelter within the affected area) and drastic reduction of the wild boar population may be performed only ahead of the ASF advance front, in the free populations. Following the decline in the epidemic, as demonstrated through passive surveillance, active population management should be reconsidered.
© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African swine fever; passive surveillance; population density; population density threshold; population reduction; population separation; wild boar

Year:  2018        PMID: 32625980      PMCID: PMC7009363          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  15 in total

1.  ASF Exit Strategy: Providing cumulative evidence of the absence of African swine fever virus circulation in wild boar populations using standard surveillance measures.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Klaus Depner; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortazar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Liisa Helena Sihvonen; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Christoph Winckler; José Cortiňas Abrahantes; Sofie Dhollander; Corina Ivanciu; Alexandra Papanikolaou; Yves Van der Stede; Sandra Blome; Vittorio Guberti; Federica Loi; Simon More; Edvins Olsevskis; Hans Hermann Thulke; Arvo Viltrop
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-03-03

2.  Population size estimates based on the frequency of genetically assigned parent-offspring pairs within a subsample.

Authors:  Björn Müller; Moritz Mercker; Jörg Brün
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  A Comparison of Perceptions of Estonian and Latvian Hunters With Regard to the Control of African Swine Fever.

Authors:  Nico Urner; Carola Sauter-Louis; Christoph Staubach; Franz Josef Conraths; Katja Schulz
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-14

4.  The golden jackal (Canis aureus) and the African swine fever pandemic: Its role is controversial but not negligible (a diet analysis study).

Authors:  Péter Kemenszky; Ferenc Jánoska; Gábor Nagy; Ágnes Csivincsik
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-23

5.  African Swine Fever Re-Emerging in Estonia: The Role of Seropositive Wild Boar from an Epidemiological Perspective.

Authors:  Katja Schulz; Jana Schulz; Christoph Staubach; Sandra Blome; Imbi Nurmoja; Franz J Conraths; Carola Sauter-Louis; Arvo Viltrop
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Combining hunting and intensive carcass removal to eradicate African swine fever from wild boar populations.

Authors:  Vincenzo Gervasi; Vittorio Gubertì
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  The Role of Interleukine-10 and Interferon-γ as Potential Markers of the Evolution of African Swine Fever Virus Infection in Wild Boar.

Authors:  Sandra Barroso-Arévalo; Jose A Barasona; Estefanía Cadenas-Fernández; Jose M Sánchez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-15

8.  African swine fever in the Lithuanian wild boar population in 2018: a snapshot.

Authors:  Arnoldas Pautienius; Katja Schulz; Christoph Staubach; Juozas Grigas; Ruta Zagrabskaite; Jurate Buitkuviene; Rolandas Stankevicius; Zaneta Streimikyte; Vaidas Oberauskas; Dainius Zienius; Algirdas Salomskas; Carola Sauter-Louis; Arunas Stankevicius
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 9.  African Swine Fever in Wild Boar in Europe-A Review.

Authors:  Carola Sauter-Louis; Franz J Conraths; Carolina Probst; Ulrike Blohm; Katja Schulz; Julia Sehl; Melina Fischer; Jan Hendrik Forth; Laura Zani; Klaus Depner; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Martin Beer; Sandra Blome
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Partitioning, a Novel Approach to Mitigate the Risk and Impact of African Swine Fever in Affected Areas.

Authors:  Solenne Costard; Andres M Perez; Francisco J Zagmutt; Jane G Pouzou; Huybert Groenendaal
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.