| Literature DB >> 32625566 |
Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Stefania Barmaz, Giulia Bellisai, Alba Brancato, Daniela Brocca, Laszlo Bura, Harry Byers, Arianna Chiusolo, Daniele Court Marques, Federica Crivellente, Chloé De Lentdecker, Marcella De Maglie, Mark Egsmose, Zoltan Erdos, Gabriella Fait, Lucien Ferreira, Marina Goumenou, Luna Greco, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Samira Jarrah, Dimitra Kardassi, Renata Leuschner, Christopher Lythgo, Jose Oriol Magrans, Paula Medina, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Alexandre Nougadere, Laura Padovani, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Ragnor Pedersen, Hermine Reich, Angela Sacchi, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Alois Stanek, Franz Streissl, Juergen Sturma, Csaba Szentes, José Tarazona, Andrea Terron, Anne Theobald, Benedicte Vagenende, Alessia Verani, Laura Villamar-Bouza.
Abstract
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Hungary, and co-rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, for the pesticide active substance Clonostachys rosea strain J1446, currently approved as Gliocladium catenulatum strain J1446, are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Clonostachys rosea strain J1446 as a fungicide in agriculture and horticulture. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.Entities:
Keywords: Clonostachys rosea strain J1446; Gliocladium catenulatum strain J1446; fungicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment
Year: 2017 PMID： 32625566 PMCID： PMC7010046 DOI： 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EFSA J ISSN： 1831-4732