Literature DB >> 32625532

Guidance on dermal absorption.

Harrie Buist, Peter Craig, Ian Dewhurst, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Carsten Kneuer, Kyriaki Machera, Christina Pieper, Daniele Court Marques, Gilles Guillot, Federica Ruffo, Arianna Chiusolo.   

Abstract

This guidance on the assessment of dermal absorption has been developed to assist notifiers, users of test facilities and Member State authorities on critical aspects related to the setting of dermal absorption values to be used in risk assessments of active substances in Plant Protection Products (PPPs). It is based on the 'scientific opinion on the science behind the revision of the guidance document on dermal absorption' issued in 2011 by the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR). The guidance refers to the EFSA PPR opinion in many instances. In addition, the first version of this guidance, issued in 2012 by the EFSA PPR Panel, has been revised in 2017 on the basis of new available data on human in vitro dermal absorption for PPPs and wherever clarifications were needed. Basic details of experimental design, available in the respective test guidelines and accompanying guidance for the conduct of studies, have not been addressed but recommendations specific to performing and interpreting dermal absorption studies with PPPs are given. Issues discussed include a brief description of the skin and its properties affecting dermal absorption. To facilitate use of the guidance, flow charts are included. Guidance is also provided, for example, when there are no data on dermal absorption for the product under evaluation. Elements for a tiered approach are presented including use of default values, data on closely related products, in vitro studies with human skin (regarded to provide the best estimate), data from experimental animals (rats) in vitro and in vivo, and the so called 'triple pack' approach. Various elements of study design and reporting that reduce experimental variation and aid consistent interpretation are presented. A proposal for reporting data for assessment reports is also provided. The issue of nanoparticles in PPPs is not addressed. Data from volunteer studies have not been discussed since their use is not allowed in EU for risk assessment of PPPs.
© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  default values; dermal absorption; in vitro; in vivo; plant protection products; triple pack

Year:  2017        PMID: 32625532      PMCID: PMC7010093          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  17 in total

1.  Dermal Penetration Analysis of Curcumin in an ex vivo Porcine Ear Model Using Epifluorescence Microscopy and Digital Image Processing.

Authors:  Olga Pelikh; Shashank R Pinnapireddy; Cornelia M Keck
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.

Authors:  Agathi Charistou; Tamara Coja; Peter Craig; Paul Hamey; Sabine Martin; Olivier Sanvido; Arianna Chiusolo; Mathilde Colas; Frédérique Istace
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 3.  Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triflusulfuron-methyl.

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez; Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Marco Binaglia; Anna Federica Castoldi; Arianna Chiusolo; Angelo Colagiorgi; Mathilde Colas; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Mark Egsmose; Gabriella Fait; Franco Ferilli; Varvara Gouliarmou; Laia Herrero Nogareda; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Aude Kienzler; Anna Lanzoni; Roberto Lava; Alberto Linguadoca; Christopher Lythgo; Oriol Magrans; Iris Mangas; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Laura Padovani; Juan Manuel Parra Morte; Rositsa Serafimova; Rachel Sharp; Csaba Szentes; Andrea Terron; Anne Theobald; Manuela Tiramani; Laura Villamar-Bouza
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 4.  Assessing the Risks to Bats from Plant Protection Products: A Review of the Recent European Food Safety Authority Statement Regarding Toxicity and Exposure Routes.

Authors:  A C Brooks; J Nopper; A Weyers; H Crosland; M Foudoulakis; S Haaf; M Hackett; A Lawrence
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 5.  Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance aluminium ammonium sulfate.

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez; Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Marco Binaglia; Anna Federica Castoldi; Arianna Chiusolo; Angelo Colagiorgi; Mathilde Colas; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Mark Egsmose; Gabriella Fait; Franco Ferilli; Varvara Gouliarmou; Laia Herrero Nogareda; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Aude Kienzler; Anna Lanzoni; Roberto Lava; Renata Leuschner; Alberto Linguadoca; Christopher Lythgo; Oriol Magrans; Iris Mangas; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Laura Padovani; Juan Manuel Parra Morte; Rositsa Serafimova; Rachel Sharp; Csaba Szentes; Andrea Terron; Anne Theobald; Manuela Tiramani; Laura Villamar-Bouza
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models.

Authors:  Jaiza Samara Macena de Araújo; Maria Cristina Volpato; Bruno Vilela Muniz; Gabriela Gama Augusto Xavier; Claudia Cristina Maia Martinelli; Renata Fonseca Vianna Lopez; Francisco Carlos Groppo; Michelle Franz-Montan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Tofacitinib Loaded Squalenyl Nanoparticles for Targeted Follicular Delivery in Inflammatory Skin Diseases.

Authors:  Rebekka Christmann; Duy-Khiet Ho; Jenny Wilzopolski; Sangeun Lee; Marcus Koch; Brigitta Loretz; Thomas Vogt; Wolfgang Bäumer; Ulrich F Schaefer; Claus-Michael Lehr
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 8.  The wash-in effect and its significance for mass casualty decontamination.

Authors:  Thomas James; Lydia Izon-Cooper; Samuel Collins; Haydn Cole; Tim Marczylo
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 9.  Towards bioinspired in vitro models of intestinal mucus.

Authors:  Lorenzo Sardelli; Daniela Peneda Pacheco; Anna Ziccarelli; Marta Tunesi; Omar Caspani; Andrea Fusari; Francesco Briatico Vangosa; Carmen Giordano; Paola Petrini
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.036

10.  Topical Application of Galgeunhwanggeumhwangryeon-Tang Recovers Skin-Lipid Barrier and Ameliorates Inflammation via Filaggrin-Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin-Interleukin 4 Pathway.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Ahn; Su Shin; Yoonju Do; Yunju Jo; Dongryeol Ryu; Ki-Tae Ha; Kibong Kim
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.