Literature DB >> 32624214

Is transferring a lower-quality embryo with a good-quality blastocyst detrimental to the likelihood of live birth?

Micah J Hill1, Allison E Eubanks2, John M Csokmay2, Alicia Y Christy3, Samad Jahandideh4, Alan H DeCherney5, Kate Devine4, Eric D Levens4, Matthew T Connell4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if transferring a lower-quality embryo with a good-quality blastocyst is detrimental, given that evidence suggests that embryos can signal the endometrium and that embryo quality may affect negatively endometrial receptivity.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization center. INTERVENTION(S): Single- versus double-embryo transfer. PATIENT(S): Patients with a double-embryo transfer of a good-quality blastocyst plus a lower-quality blastocyst, early blastocyst, or morula were compared with patients receiving a single good-quality blastocyst. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth, multiple gestation. RESULT(S): In this study, 4,640 in vitro fertilization cycles were analyzed. In none of the analyses did transferring a second lower-quality embryo negatively affect birth rate. In the primary analysis, transferring a second lower-quality embryo increased live birth by 10% and the multiple birth rate by 15%. The addition of a fair- or poor-quality blastocyst or early blastocyst markedly increased the twin birth rate by 22%-27% with an 8%-12% increase in live birth. The addition of a morula did not increase live birth but resulted in 12% more multiples. In women younger than 38 years, adding a lower-quality embryo increased the birth rate by 7% but resulted in 18% increase in multiples. In women 38 years or older, adding a lower-quality embryo increased the live birth rate by 9% with a 15% increase in multiples. CONCLUSION(S): Addition of a lower-quality embryo does not have a detrimental effect on a good-quality blastocyst and results in a small increase in live births. However, this is at the expense of a marked increase in the likelihood of multiple gestations. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poor-quality embryo; double-embryo transfer; embryo-endometrial crosstalk

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32624214     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Embryo morphology and live birth in the United States.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Jacqueline R Ho; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady; Victoria K Cortessis; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-02-23

2.  Effect of blastocyst morphology and developmental speed on transfer strategy for grade "C" blastocyst in vitrified-warmed cycles.

Authors:  Yuxia He; Shiping Chen; Jianqiao Liu; Xiangjin Kang; Haiying Liu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.234

3.  Effect of trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A on live birth rate per embryo in good prognosis patients.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Ravi Agarwal; Jacqueline R Ho; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?

Authors:  Wenjie Wang; Jiali Cai; Lanlan Liu; Yingpei Xu; Zhenfang Liu; Jinghua Chen; Xiaoming Jiang; Xiaohua Sun; Jianzhi Ren
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.